Thanks Danny.
I'll make sure I use pychecker so I don't shoot myself in the foot with not so
easy to catch typos in variable names and syntax blunders.
I might check with the pychecker devs to see if there's any effort to get it put
into the standard distribution. I think it's too handy to not h
On Apr 22, 2005, at 12:21 AM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Apr 21, 2005, at 9:06 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
###
def y1():
pass
def foo():
from __main__ import y1
pass
foo()
###
Here is a version of the code, stripped of the timeit code. The
above segment exhibits the same symptoms as the previo
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Gautam Saha wrote:
> A newbie here..I was wondering if python can help me to track the URL in
> browser (IE6+, FF, Mozilla) location bar.
>
> What I want is to get each URL from the the browser location bar, as
> user clicks from links to link in the web (or types an URL) an
Gautam Saha wrote:
Hi:
A newbie here..I was wondering if python can help me to track the URL in
browser (IE6+, FF, Mozilla) location bar.
You might find some hints here:
http://wwwsearch.sourceforge.net/bits/GeneralFAQ.html
Kent
___
Tutor maillist - Tut
On Apr 22, 2005, at 11:41, Chris Smith wrote:
Do you have a suggestion as to what can I give a module so it has
enough information to execute a function that resides in __main__?
Here is a visual of what is going on:
--__main__
def y1():
pass
import foo
foo.run(string_from_main) #what shou
> > A newbie here..I was wondering if python can help me to track the URL in
> > browser (IE6+, FF, Mozilla) location bar.
I think browser helper objects may also be useful. ASPN has a thread at:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/ctypes-users/2263094
Marcus
__
On Apr 21, 2005, at 9:06 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
###
def y1():
pass
def foo():
from __main__ import y1
pass
foo()
###
Here is a version of the code, stripped of the timeit code. The above
segment exhibits the same symptoms as the previously submitted one.
Even though I am running this
Hello evryone
I am a newbie to python. I have a makefile which i can compile in
UNIX/LINUX, But i
I am planning to write a python script which actually does what my
MAKEFILE does. The make file is
#Makefile and some scripts to give output
#numbers
#Change till sign #END
var1:=564-574
a1 = 23
Joseph Quigley wrote:
In QBASIC there was the command "CLS"
this wiped the screen and "started printing letters to the screen at the
top " of the console window.
On Windows you can
import os
os.system('cls')
Kent
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
h
Interesting. So several distros use rpms? I though only red hat used 'em.
Rpm does in fact have dependency resolution, and rpm-based distributions
use a
package manager that can download the dependencies and install them for you -
urpmi on mandrake, yum or apt4rpm on Fedora and Redhat, Yast on Su
Joseph Quigley wrote on Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:15:51 -0600:
> In QBASIC there was the command "CLS"
> this wiped the screen and "started printing letters to the screen at the
> top " of the console window.
With a quick Google, it does indeed appear to be in the cookbook:
http://aspn.activestate.com/
OK, here is a brief, working example.
In my working directory I have the file test.py containing:
# test.py
import mypackage
c=mypackage.MyClass()
c.foo()
In the mypackage directory I have __init__.py and MyClass.py containing:
# __init__.py
from MyClass import MyClass
# MyClass.py
class MyClass:
In QBASIC there was the command "CLS"
this wiped the screen and "started printing letters to the screen at the
top " of the console window.
Is there any such command in Python? Would a Python cook book have this (I
have pay-by-the-minute dial-up Internet so I can't go online for long)?
Thanks i
On Wednesday 20 Apr 2005 20:07, Kent Johnson wrote:
> Smith, Jeff wrote:
> > What's the quickest (and most Pythonic) way to do the following Perlism:
> > $str = s/d+/d/;
> >
> > (i.e. collapsing multiple occurrences of the letter 'd' to just one)
>
> import re
> s = re.sub('d+', 'd', s, 1)
>
>
On 22 Apr 2005, at 03:06, Chris Smith wrote:
###
def y1():
pass
def foo():
from __main__ import y1
pass
foo()
###
Here is a version of the code, stripped of the timeit code. The above
segment exhibits the same symptoms as the previously submitted one.
Even though I am running this as
Joseph Quigley wrote on Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:45:05 -0600:
> Interesting. So several distros use rpms? I though only red hat used 'em.
Yeah, including some major ones like Mandrake and Suse.
--
Yours,
Andrei
=
Real contact info (decode with rot13):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fcnz-serr! Cyrnfr qb abg
I'm trying to understand custom iterators in Python, and created the
following toy class for sequence comparison, which seems to work:
class Foo(object):
"""A toy class to experiment with __eq__ and __iter__"""
def __init__(self, listA, listB):
self.head, self.tail = listA, listB
de
David Driver wrote:
I have generally used python for tasks that are scripty and not
appish. I have found that I don't know the language very well even
though I have been scripting with it for about two years. To remedy
this I am in the process of laying out a mock up for an accounting
system (GL, A
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Danny Yoo wrote:
>
> > In Perl, you can perl -c somehardtoreadperlprogram.pl that will just
> > check the syntax. The above problem would have been caught in Perl
> > since I always use strict. Is there a command line option in Python to
> > do a Pychecker-like syntax check?
> In Perl, you can perl -c somehardtoreadperlprogram.pl that will just
> check the syntax. The above problem would have been caught in Perl since
> I always use strict. Is there a command line option in Python to do a
> Pychecker-like syntax check?
Hi Mike,
Unfortunately, no, because there are s
I have generally used python for tasks that are scripty and not
appish. I have found that I don't know the language very well even
though I have been scripting with it for about two years. To remedy
this I am in the process of laying out a mock up for an accounting
system (GL, AR, AP). This is the
Hi all;
just hope I'm not completely OT with this here; if so, I sincerely apologize...
At the moment, I am trying to implement a small client/server system that
communicate using SOAP, and for each client to connect to the SOAP server (via
HTTP) I wanted to run a thread which exclusively is re
I had a frustrating time yesterday with a small Python program I wrote. I wasn't
getting the results I expected, so I sprinkled print statements through it. I
wasn't getting anywhere. I tossed it into Komodo to see if the background syntax
checker would pick up something I was missing. I then st
Cedric BRINER wrote:
in my python code I have changed some classes like the following
from (I):
class CYear:
def __init__(self, year):
self.__year=year
print str(self.__year) <<---(*)
print 'dir of: '+str(dir(self))
print 'type of: '+str(type(self))
def __s
> I am working on a script at the moment, in which I seem to need to
> re-initialise a class instance from within some of its methods.
Before I go
> too much further down this route - could anyone comment on whether
the call
> self.__init__() is in itself considered bad style or 'unpythonic'?
NO
hello,
I have 2 questions. the first one is maybe not directly related to python (it's
about eric3), and the second oneis about what the command `type' give back for
two instances
in my python code I have changed some classes like the following
from (I):
class CYear:
def __init__(self, yea
On Friday, Apr 22, 2005, at 03:52 America/Chicago, Just van Rossum -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Importing __main__ is a very silly thing to do anyway, if you ask me.
All comments from you, Bob, and Jack have been *very* helpful. I think
I understand better what is going on. What's got me scratch
Barnaby Scott wrote:
I am working on a script at the moment, in which I seem to need to
re-initialise a class instance from within some of its methods. Before I go
too much further down this route - could anyone comment on whether the call
self.__init__() is in itself considered bad style or 'unpyt
This looks like a bug in PythonIDE to me. I fired up my Mac and tried this in PythonIDE with Python
2.3.3:
def f():
print 'executed f'
code = '''
print 'name:', __name__
import __main__
print dir(__main__)
from __main__ import f
f()
'''
exec code in globals(), {}
It prints
name: __main__
then
I am working on a script at the moment, in which I seem to need to
re-initialise a class instance from within some of its methods. Before I go
too much further down this route - could anyone comment on whether the call
self.__init__() is in itself considered bad style or 'unpythonic'?
For instance
30 matches
Mail list logo
