[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051420] Re: Error in dash(1) manual in <& and >& descriptions

2024-02-21 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Package changed: boinc (Ubuntu) => dash (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051420 Title: Error in dash(1) manual in <& and >& descriptions Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054620] Re: libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

2024-03-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
dput ubuntu ../lvm2_2.03.16-3ubuntu2_source.changes Uploading lvm2 using ftp to ubuntu (host: upload.ubuntu.com; directory: /ubuntu) running supported-distribution: check whether the target distribution is currently supported (using distro-info) {'allowed': ['release', 'proposed', 'backports', 'se

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059172] Re: autopkgtest failure with perl/5.38.2-3.2

2024-03-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, I found this # list special cases where a Breaks entry doesn't need to imply # Replaces+Provides my %triplet_check_skip = ( "perl-base" => [ "libfile-spec-perl" ], "libperl5.38" => [ "libfilter-perl" ], ); Maybe we can do something like # list special cases where a Break

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1975898] [NEW] RM: ntp from kinetic?

2022-05-26 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Public bug reported: Should we delete it now that ntpsec has migrated? ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators (ubuntu-archive) Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch se

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1975898] Re: RM: ntp from kinetic?

2022-05-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064407] Re: Merge heimdal from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-07-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
dencies on amd64 are different than i386 resulting in different files on amd64 and i386. -- Gianfranco Costamagna Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:31:18 +0100 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heimdal/+bug/2064407/+subscriptions -- Mailin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-07-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Also affects: mpich (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to graphite2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071468 Title: ELF package metadata failure: e

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-07-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Also affects: gsl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to graphite2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071468 Title: ELF package metadata failure: env

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-07-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Also affects: tix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: setserial (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to graphite2 in Ubuntu. ht

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-07-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Also affects: quantlib (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to graphite2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071468 Title: ELF package metadata failure

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-07-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Also affects: deal.ii (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to graphite2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071468 Title: ELF package metadata failure:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-08-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Also affects: biosig (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to graphite2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071468 Title: ELF package metadata failure:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-08-20 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: mpich (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to curl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071468 Title: ELF package metadata failure: environment varia

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905735] Re: ubuntu-image autopkgtests failing since python-debian 0.1.38

2023-01-26 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: python-debian (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-debian in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905735 Title: ubuntu-image autopkg

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040384] Re: Merge heimdal from Debian unstable for noble

2023-12-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040384 Title: Merge heimdal from Debian unstable for nob

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036253] Re: FTBFS: missing strl* symbols fail the build

2023-12-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu. h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036253] Re: FTBFS: missing strl* symbols fail the build

2023-12-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
both sponsored after some nitpicks changed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036253 Title: FTBFS: missing strl* symbols fail the build Status in heimdal pac

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036253] Re: FTBFS: missing strl* symbols fail the build

2023-12-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Miriam, please adapt the bug description to follow the SRU bug template https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036253 T

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046971] [NEW] RM signon from noble

2023-12-19 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Public bug reported: signond was merged from Debian, making this signon a source package providing no binaries. Please kick it out ** Affects: signon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators (ubuntu-archive) Status: New -- You received t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036253] Re: FTBFS: missing strl* symbols fail the build

2024-01-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Patch added: "heimdal_7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-4.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heimdal/+bug/2036253/+attachment/5736213/+files/heimdal_7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-4.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036253] Re: FTBFS: missing strl* symbols fail the build

2024-01-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, this is probably what we should do for mantic release?field.comment=Hello, this is probably what we should do for mantic release? --- 7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-3/debian/patches/0022-Always-build-rk_strlcat-and-rk_strlcpy-symbols.patch 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ 7.8.gi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036253] Re: FTBFS: missing strl* symbols fail the build

2024-01-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Uploaded on mantic queue -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036253 Title: FTBFS: missing strl* symbols fail the build Status in heimdal package in Ubuntu:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71

2024-01-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
I don't understand why bluez packaging can't be merged with the debian fixes and continues to follow some logic of "never update to newer dh or compat". Also patches from Debian are never received, as well as new binaries not installed. I did some really little cleanup and the package now builds

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036253] Re: FTBFS: missing strl* symbols fail the build

2024-01-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
it builds, so we are fine :) ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu. https:/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71

2024-01-08 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello Daniel! >Thank you for working over the weekend on this. I would have resolved it myself on the Monday if someone >answered the question in comment #11. This is what a team does, help other people. In this case I started answering to comment #11, I did fix->fix->fix DH_VERBOSE, fix somethi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71

2024-01-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, I did the merge from Debian, now the packaging is really simpler, please have a look and upload if possible. ** Attachment added: "bluez_5.71-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2047780/+attachment/5738106/+files/bluez_5.71-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71

2024-01-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
and ell-dev needs a i386 whitelist, not sure -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047780 Title: BlueZ release 5.71 Status in bluez package in Ubuntu: Fix Relea

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71

2024-01-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
two patches are now with Debian bugs Opened #1060393 in bluez 5.67-1 by Gianfranco Costamagna (locutusofborg) «please update patch work-around-Logitech-diNovo-Edge-keyboard-firmware-i.patch». https://bugs.debian.org/1060393 Opened #1060395 in bluez by Gianfranco Costamagna (locutusofborg

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71

2024-01-11 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
next time we should make sure the changelog lists all the delta from Debian :) But with the same tarball it will be easier to find it out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049352] Re: Package BlueZ 5.72 for Noble

2024-01-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Bluez should migrate next run, and then you can do the update if you want, is it ok for you? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049352 Title: Package BlueZ 5.72

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049352] Re: Package BlueZ 5.72 for Noble

2024-01-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
and it migrated! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049352 Title: Package BlueZ 5.72 for Noble Status in bluez package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1841783] Re: Update to 1.2.0?

2022-04-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: speex (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to speex in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841783 Title: Update to 1.2.0? Status in speex package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1424903] Re: package libspeexdsp1:i386 1.2~rc1.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package libspeexdsp1:i386 is already installed and configured

2022-04-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
should be ok now ** Changed in: speex (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to speex in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1424903 Title: package libspeexdsp1:i386 1.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1446133] Re: package libspeexdsp1:amd64 1.2~rc1.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting conf

2022-04-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
should be ok now ** Changed in: speex (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to speex in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446133 Title: package libspeexdsp1:amd64 1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1973270] [NEW] json-c please mark package as multiarch

2022-05-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Public bug reported: [Impact] People using multi-arch to build for different architectures [Test Plan] * Install json-c on M-A environment [Where problems could occur] * Specially now that we don't have anymore real i386 env [Other Info] json-c (0.15-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Mar

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1973270] Re: json-c please mark package as multiarch

2022-05-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
ii libjson-c-dev:amd64 0.15-3~ubuntu1.22.04.1 amd64 JSON manipulation library - development files ii libjson-c-dev:i3860.15-3~ubuntu1.22.04.1 i386 JSON manipulation library - development files ii libjson-c5:amd64 0.15-3~ub

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1973270] Re: json-c please mark package as multiarch

2022-05-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
confirmed, they have been correctly installed, thanks ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jso

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1973270] Re: json-c please mark package as multiarch

2022-05-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
after checking swupdate against migration-reference/0 in jammy, the same regression was seen, so now britney is not seeing it as regression anymore. Autopkgtests are now fine! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to j

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1973270] Re: json-c please mark package as multiarch

2022-05-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
(and also, retrying the test made it pass) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to json-c in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973270 Title: json-c please mark package as multiarch Status in json-c package i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1780680] Re: Older version in bionic than in xenial

2022-01-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: fuse-umfuse-ext2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780680 Title: Older version in bionic than in xeni

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960608] Re: python-pip >= 21.3.1+dfsg-3 fails pip3-root.sh autopkgtest with python3.10

2022-03-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, there are also bugs in python.m4, the same fix as https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/pull/3764/files fixes the issue in m4 too I patched locally my python.m4 with something like this: - sitedir = sysconfig.get_path('purelib', vars={'base':'$am_py_prefix'}) - sitedir = sysconfig.get_path(

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960608] Re: python-pip >= 21.3.1+dfsg-3 fails pip3-root.sh autopkgtest with python3.10

2022-03-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Opened #1006784 in src:automake-1.16 1:1.16.5-1.1 by Gianfranco Costamagna (locutusofborg) «automake: fixes for python3.10 distutils changes». https://bugs.debian.org/1006784 Please have a look at it if possible. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1006784 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917620] Re: failed to install libffi-dev package

2021-09-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: libffi (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libffi in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917620 Title: failed to install libffi-dev package Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917620] Re: failed to install libffi-dev package

2021-09-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, xenial has version 3.2.1-4 and artful had 3.2.1-6. Sadly, artful is EOL now, so no support is available for it anymore. I would suggest you to upgrade to bionic or focal, the latest LTS available. alternatively you can download manually the deb from there https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sourc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023437] [NEW] ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary

2023-06-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Public bug reported: root@Unimatrix08-Jammy:/clang# /usr/bin/g++-12 -O3 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wno-unused-command-line-argument -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Wall -Wextra -Wno

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023437]

2023-06-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Confirmed also on 2.40.50.20230611-2ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023437 Title: ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023437]

2023-06-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello Alan, thanks for the answer. I uploaded here [1] the .so files in a single directory [1] https://drive.abinsula.com/index.php/s/NMDO384gjCOCEJw With this command I could reproduce again the issue, let me know if it is enough to have more information on the issue In the meanwhile I patched

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023437]

2023-06-21 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Created attachment 14939 crt*.o files -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023437 Title: ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary Status in binut

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023437]

2023-06-21 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
thanks! I'll test shortly! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023437 Title: ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary Status in binutils: Fix

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023437] Re: ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary

2023-06-22 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023437 Title: ppc64el gold linker produces unusable cl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023437]

2023-06-22 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, testing was successful, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023437 Title: ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary Status in binu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1993800] Re: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0x2f689c8: v4i32 = ARMISD::VCMPZ 0x2f696b8, Constant:i32<2>

2022-11-20 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Fix uploaded in Debian, will be syncd in some hours. ** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-15 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pac

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997338] [NEW] libatk-bridge2.0-0 uninstallable on i386

2022-11-22 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Public bug reported: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- lunar/lunar/i386/v/vlc/20221121_104906_b4207@/log.gz Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 9 Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 9 Investigating (0) libvlccore9:i386 < none -> 3.0.17.4-5 @un puN Ib > Br

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997533] Re: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep

2022-11-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
diff -Nru flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/changelog flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/changelog --- flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/changelog 2022-11-11 09:10:23.0 +0100 +++ flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/changelog 2022-11-24 19:56:12.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +flac (1.4.2+ds-2ubuntu1) lunar; urgency=medium + + * Do

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997533] Re: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep

2022-11-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
sponsored and unsubscribing sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997533 Title: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pando

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
I updated debugedit to 5.0 version, the changelog looks like adding some errors when chmod can't be done correctly @@ -3419,7 +3431,8 @@ } /* Make sure we can read and write */ - chmod (file, stat_buf.st_mode | S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR); + if (chmod (file, stat_buf.st_mode | S_IRUSR | S_IWUS

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939409] Re: e2fsprogs 1.46.3-1 on architecture s390x fails in test f_baddotdir

2021-09-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
sponsored 1.46.3-1ubuntu3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939409 Title: e2fsprogs 1.46.3-1 on architecture s390x fails in test f_baddotdir Status in e2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939409] Re: e2fsprogs 1.46.3-1 on architecture s390x fails in test f_baddotdir

2021-09-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** No longer affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Impish) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939409 Title: e2fsprogs 1.46.3-1 on architecture s390x fails in test f_ba

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037527] [NEW] [Ffe] libwebp

2023-09-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Public bug reported: - 9/13/2023: version 1.3.2 This is a binary compatible release. * security fix for lossless decoder (chromium: #1479274, CVE-2023-4863) - 6/23/2023: version 1.3.1 This is a binary compatible release. * security fixes for lossless encoder (#603, chromium: #1420107, #14

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2013083] Re: libwebp-dev doesn't install CMake configs

2023-09-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
This is fixed in Debian sid/testing, will be fixed for mantic if bug: 2037527 is accepted, or to 24.04 otherwise. Setting right now as fix released. ** Changed in: libwebp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037527] Re: [Ffe] libwebp

2023-09-29 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
stable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. * Upload to unstable. -- Boyuan Yang Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:03:28 -0400 libwebp (1.3.2-0.1~exp2) experimental; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. [ Gianfranco Costamagna ] * Also install .a files again. * Make

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1340250] Re: "#pragma weak" symbol is 0 even when defined

2019-03-21 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=cca32830b57e91f837c01d15b8732f23ff97fc36 Upstream fix ** Changed in: libidn (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libunistring (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1813587] Re: libunistring and libidn ftbfs on 18.04 LTS

2019-03-21 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
In the same way, I'm uploading a fix for libidn, I think it is really better to have as-needed used for the binary size, so better use the upstream patch and revert the package currently in updates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, wh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1813587] Re: libunistring ftbfs on 18.04 LTS

2019-03-21 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
I uploaded the upstream patch in the unapproved queue, thanks! ** Changed in: libunistring (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: Jeremy Bicha (jbicha) => Gianfranco Costamagna (costamagnagianfranco) ** Summary changed: - libunistring ftbfs on 18.04 LTS + libunistring and libidn ftbfs on 18.04

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1813587] Re: libunistring and libidn ftbfs on 18.04 LTS

2019-03-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Ok Brian, so lets backport the fix from 19.04 and fix also 18.10 ** Also affects: libidn (Ubuntu Cosmic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libunistring (Ubuntu Cosmic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libunistring (Ubuntu Cosmic) Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1813587] Re: libunistring and libidn ftbfs on 18.04 LTS

2019-03-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
+0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libunistring (0.9.10-1ubuntu1.18.10.1) cosmic; urgency=medium + + * Cherry-pick pthread fix from upstream and disco release. +(LP: #1813587) + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Wed, 27 Mar 2019 12:21:30 +0100 + libunistring (0.9.10-1ubuntu1) cosmic; urgency=medium * Do

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1813587] Re: libunistring and libidn ftbfs on 18.04 LTS

2019-03-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
iption ** Changed in: libunistring (Ubuntu Cosmic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gianfranco Costamagna (costamagnagianfranco) ** Changed in: libunistring (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jeremy Bicha (jbicha) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: libidn (Ubuntu Cosmic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gianfr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1755311] Re: "Warning: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile"

2019-03-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
them) ** Changed in: qtwebkit-opensource-src (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: qtwebkit-opensource-src (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gianfranco Costamagna (costamagnagianfranco) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1813587] Re: libunistring and libidn ftbfs on 18.04 LTS

2019-03-29 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
This is something that is currently fixing just a build failure, not something that the end user is affected... Marking as verification done (and I'm using the package because my system is on bionic) ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-cosmic ** Tag

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1830340] [NEW] icu 63.2 makes acorn ftbfs (*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated)

2019-05-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Public bug reported: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acorn/5.5.3+ds3-3/+build/16839533 As you can see, the package is now FTBFS. I traced down this to be an icu problem, by starting from a disco chroot and then manually upgrading packages until I got the icu update. I can confirm also icu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1830340] Re: icu 63.2 makes acorn ftbfs (*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated)

2019-05-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #929474 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929474 ** Also affects: icu (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929474 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1830340] Re: icu 63.2 makes acorn ftbfs (*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated)

2019-05-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Thanks Steven for the hint! yes, it looks like the same bug, I can say with icu 64 it still occurs, I might try a custom icu build with the mentioned diff reverted... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to icu in Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1830340] Re: icu 63.2 makes acorn ftbfs (*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated)

2019-06-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Seems to have been fixed in the -2 upload currently in proposed... ** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to icu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1843755] Re: [FFe] Please accept systemd 242 to Eoan

2019-09-12 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
I added in the description, the changelog to know what has been introduced in this release, something I would personally appreciate to have in my dailyjob is: * systemd.volatile=overlay * systemd-networkd-wait-online gained a new setting --any for waiting * networkctl list/status/lldp now accept g

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1508656] Re: Build with multiarch support

2019-09-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Done in eoan! ** Changed in: pocketsphinx (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pocketsphinx in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508656 Title: Build with m

[Touch-packages] [Bug 854762] Re: pocketsphinx_batch throws ERROR

2019-09-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
I uploaded in Ubuntu eoan a new version, please try again if the problem persists ** Changed in: pocketsphinx (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pocketsphinx in Ubu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1318103] Re: Error importing Python module pocketsphinx

2019-09-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
The package in eoan is now Python3, please try again and set back to "new" if you still have this issue ** Changed in: pocketsphinx (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 863533] Re: PocketSphinx Segmentation Fault

2019-09-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
The package in eoan is now Python3, please try again and set back to "new" if you still have this issue ** Changed in: pocketsphinx (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1844119] Re: readelf crash on 32bit, leading to abi-monitor testsuite regression

2019-09-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
it works fine with binutils_2.32.51.20190821-1ubuntu1_i386.deb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844119 Title: readelf crash on 32bit, leading to abi-monito

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1844119] [NEW] readelf crash on 32bit, leading to abi-monitor testsuite regression

2019-09-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Public bug reported: readelf --debug-dump=info libjsoncpp.so.1.8.1 to reproduce dpkg -l |grep binut ii binutils2.32.51.20190905-0ubuntu1 i386 GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities ii binutils-common:i3862.32.51.20190905-0ubuntu1 i386 Common files fo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1844119] Re: readelf crash on 32bit, leading to abi-monitor testsuite regression

2019-09-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Something in this diff regressed it and makes it crash. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/440335350/binutils_2.32.51.20190821-1ubuntu1_2.32.51.20190905-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1844119] Re: readelf crash on 32bit, leading to abi-monitor testsuite regression

2019-09-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
manually downgrading glibc to 2.29 on i386, with newer binutils fails, so back to a binutils bug ii libc-bin 2.29-0ubuntu3 i386 GNU C Library: Binaries ii libc-dev-bin 2.29-0ubuntu3 i386 GNU C Library: Development binari

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1844119] Re: readelf crash on 32bit, leading to abi-monitor testsuite regression

2019-09-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
For some reasons, gdb seems to make me suspect of glibc 2.30... ** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1844119] Re: readelf crash on 32bit, leading to abi-monitor testsuite regression

2019-09-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
<65c00> DW_AT_external: 1 <65c00> DW_AT_name: (indirect string, offset: 0x1d277): _M_get_allocator <65c04> DW_AT_decl_file : 2 <65c05> DW_AT_decl_line : 290 <65c07> DW_AT_decl_column : 7 <65c08> DW_AT_linkage_name: (indirect string, offset: 0xdb15):

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1844119] Re: readelf crash on 32bit, leading to abi-monitor testsuite regression

2019-09-19 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #25018 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25018 ** Also affects: binutils via https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25018 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190] [NEW] binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work

2019-09-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Public bug reported: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 ** Affects: binutils Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: binutils (Ubuntu) Importance: High Ass

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190]

2019-09-25 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
thanks a ton for the quick fixes! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1695611] Re: libjson-c3-0.12.1-1.1 has building bug

2019-08-08 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Please reopen if you still have this issue! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to json-c in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695611 Title: libjson-c3-0.12.1-1.1 has building bug Status in json-c package i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1695611] Re: libjson-c3-0.12.1-1.1 has building bug

2019-08-08 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
I hope it is ok now ** Changed in: json-c (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to json-c in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695611 Title: libjson-c3-0.12.1-1.1 h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1843383] [NEW] lxc, please bump epoch to 1

2019-09-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Public bug reported: A lot of stuff from Debian is bd-uninstallable because of the missing epoch on the Ubuntu package. e.g. lua-lxc, and general packages using liblxc1 at runtime (python3-lxc and something else). I think bumping epoch (whilst bad in general), would be a big improvement in this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1837537] Re: FTBFS since lxc has different version numbers in Debian and Ubuntu

2019-09-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
@vorlon, I did followup on your upload, by also dropping epoch on the runtime liblxc1 dependency, to avoid it being stuck again in queue... it should finally migrate now. I asked a while ago to Ubuntu lxc developers to bump epoch, and they were happy with that... not sure why they forgot, but I'm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1808393] Re: libedit 3.1-20181209-1 causes php7.3 to FTBFS

2019-01-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Robie, is this still an issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libedit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1808393 Title: libedit 3.1-20181209-1 causes php7.3 to FTBFS Status in libedit package in U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1813587] Re: libunistring ftbfs on 18.04 LTS

2019-01-29 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
yes, it is the same, but unfortunately I don't know if the fix is sane or not. the real bug is this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1340250 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libunistri

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807286] Re: systemd SEGV freezing on install of virtualbox

2019-02-07 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
should be fixed in the systemd in disco ** Changed in: virtualbox (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1799048] Re: package libffi6:i386 3.2.1-8 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

2019-02-07 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
I would try an apt-get install --reinstall of the package. ** Changed in: libffi (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libffi in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1855993] Re: Navit FTBFS - cmake fix needed to work with newer pango

2019-12-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: cmake (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855993 Title: Navit FTBFS - cmake fix needed to work

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859404] [NEW] binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64

2020-01-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Public bug reported: Retrying builds on bileto with the release only pocket enabled worked correctly. Still trying to figure out what can have regressed it (Debian doesn't show the issue, but probably it is affected on the same way, just his CPUs can understand the new instructions? ** Affect

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859404] Re: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64

2020-01-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
golang-1.13 has a really similar issue # ../misc/cgo/testshared shared_test.go:72: executing go install -installsuffix=5577006791947779410 -buildmode=shared runtime sync/atomic failed exit status 2: # /tmp/go-build097387848/b009/libruntime,sync-atomic.so /<>/pkg/tool/linux_arm64/link: running

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859404] Re: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64

2020-01-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
also hedgewars, ghc, and others are having the very same SIGILL -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859404 Title: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859404] Re: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64

2020-01-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859404 Title: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-

  1   2   >