Selecting "Do not disturb" shows the glitch included on the disabled
notifications icon
** Attachment added: "20250410_091439.jpg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2106376/+attachment/5870725/+files/20250410_091439.jpg
--
You received this bug notification because y
Thanks, I will try out 25.04!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106376
Title:
[xe] Top of screen (date & time and notification area) glitches
Status in linux-
Confirmed, xe.enable_psr=0 is present
```
$ cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.11.0-1018-oem
root=UUID=4e8c053e-ecc7-4171-ae6b-c6e5c1679d23 ro quiet splash xe.enable_psr=0
vt.handoff=7
```
I also added a couple more photos
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Image of the glitch appearing as wide as the notification window
** Attachment added: "20250410_091528.jpg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2106376/+attachment/5870724/+files/20250410_091528.jpg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
weird, possibly unrelated, diagonal triangle the width of my monitor
showing my background image
** Attachment added: "20250410_091321.jpg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2106376/+attachment/5870723/+files/20250410_091321.jpg
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
System freeze, and finally (after some minutes) goes back to login screen
It seems happening every time I'm in a meeting in Teams (web version ), I don't
know if it's linked or not...
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu3
ProcVersionSigna
ollowed the recommendations at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems, none of which fixed
the problem. Everything that the page tells me to check looks OK.
The printer has a built-in scanner, which works in 20.04.
Output from apt-cache (I'm not sure which of these are rig
wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems, none of which fixed
the problem. Everything that the page tells me to check looks OK.
The printer has a built-in scanner, which works in 20.04.
Output from apt-cache (I'm not sure which of these are right or
relevant):
steve@weddell:~$ apt-cach
For sru purposes please be explicit about what "logs" we are looking at
to know if the interface has been bounced.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2003250
Tit
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags added: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://b
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089712
Title:
pam-auth-update --remove doesn't work properly
Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
If this bug only applies to jammy and earlier, I question from an SRU
policy perspective if this is a behavior change we want to introduce
into 2+-year-old stable releases. It may be more correct but it may
also be unexpected on existing systems.
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Description changed:
Reporting against libglib2.0-bin as that package provides gio
Description: Ubuntu 24.10
Release: 24.10
libglib2.0-bin:
Installed: 2.82.1-0ubuntu1
-
- This issue was first noted on a Mint 22 Cinnamon install, and subsequently
reproduced on Ubuntu 2
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues #3542
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3542
** Also affects: glib2.0 (Arch Linux) via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3542
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification b
Priorities are handled entirely via the archive overrides. It doesn't
matter if this is changed in the SRU or not, we should accept it either
way.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bug
Please take care to check any changes here with the Debian maintainer
(Sam).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2087827
Title:
Pam includes does not look in /usr/l
Public bug reported:
Reporting against libglib2.0-bin as that package provides gio
Description:Ubuntu 24.10
Release:24.10
libglib2.0-bin:
Installed: 2.82.1-0ubuntu1
This issue was first noted on a Mint 22 Cinnamon install, and subsequently
reproduced on Ubuntu 24.04.1 and Ubuntu 2
** Tags added: regression-update
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2087551
Title:
OpenSS
Hey @alvar54, sorry you're having issues. Can you describe what behavior
you are expecting versus what's happening on your system?
There are a number of apparmor rejections in the logs (that the bug
reporting collected), but if the system itself is freezing, it you be
useful to see if there are ad
Dropping ubuntu-sponsors, please re-subscribe when there's a new patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tar in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059734
Title:
Tar fails to extract archives that include
I think it's short-sighted to only include arm and ppc here given that
the upstream solution sets the syscall number for all archs, and the
syscall is defined for all archs even if glibc happens to not be relying
on this syscall on archs other than ppc and arm. Please adjust the
patch to match ups
Hello Benjamin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted tzdata into oracular-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2024b-1ubuntu2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 07:38:26PM -, Eugene San wrote:
> Currently when installing using Calamares (Kubuntu, Lubuntu etc)
Ok thanks for this clarification.
> and probably Ubiquity (Mate etc)
There are no Ubuntu flavors that use ubiquity as their installer in Ubuntu
24.10.
--
You received
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 04:25:46PM -, Eugene San wrote:
> While I agree that moving systemd-cryptsetup to 'recommended' (or even
> 'depends') is the solution, it doesn't solve the issue with installs
> using LiveCDs.
We are discussing a stable release update to systemd which would raise
system
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084251
Title:
Only single LUKS device unlocke
Also it doesn't matter if these characters are part of all the character
sets if they're passed through to the client terminal in the wrong
ENCODING. non ASCII characters almost entirely do not have the same
binary representation in UTF-8 as in other character sets, including
these.
--
You receiv
Ok that's correct, at the time of review Tobias was a member of the
security team so I think we can take that as the necessary sign-off.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
** Package changed: pam (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080821
Title:
Custom caps lock action inconsistent on login screen
St
Pam does not see the keyboard, only input text from the application
driving it. What Ubuntu flavor are you using? This determines what
package implements your lock screen.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam i
apt does not show up on https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/priority-
mismatches.html
so this would wind up getting demoted again
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Actual fixed versions for this issue are still sitting in focal-proposed
and jammy-proposed. However, we did a no-change rebuild ofthe current
versions in the respective updates pockets to the security pocket, so
that the version in proposed could be published first in the updates
pocket, but leavi
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Public bug reported:
Python 3.12 got more strict about quoting in strings that often impacts
regular expressions, and pyflakes on the apparmor apport hooks reports:
$ pyflakes3 debian/apport/source_apparmor.py
debian/apport/source_apparmor.py:61: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence
'\('
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036467
Title:
Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to
Prior to upgrade, was this system configured for passwordless login?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075968
Title:
cannot login after upgrade from xubuntu 22.0
latest/edge is not what we use (nor what we should use) in production.
When should we expect this to reach the default stable channels used on
Ubuntu LTSes?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
ht
An upload of tzdata to mantic-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "to be reuploaded with better patch".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
Hello Helga, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apport into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.28.1-0ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,
Accepted tzdata into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2024a-3ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
Hello theofficialgman, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator into noble-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-
appindicator/58-1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Pleas
sorry, the template is there but I had loaded this page yesterday and
not refreshed!
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags added: ver
An upload of gnome-shell-extension-appindicator has been uploaded to
noble for this issue, but this bug lacks an SRU test case.
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.8.0 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Tes
gle with ordering when handling the massive Y2028 time_t
transition when upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS.
It was identified that dropping the libglib2.0-0 transitional package
can help apt do things in the correct order.
Technically, Steve Langasek already removed libglib2.0-0 from noble
rele
Hello Leó, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
properties/0.99.49 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
> ⚠️ Only land this in the release pocket after PPAs have been resigned
I am marking this incomplete, as it is unclear to me what the intended
timeline is for the resigning, or if your comment about the release
pocket should also apply to -updates.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
Status:
** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-24.04 => noble-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037015
Title:
Screen corruption of webkit2gtk
recent discussion out-of-band suggested this might have been a rpi-
specific failure, is that accurate?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcanberra in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060693
Title:
N
This is targeted to 24.04 and marked as 'in progress' but is definitely
not landing before 24.04 GA on Thursday. What is the overall plan here?
should this go to SRU? (It can, but in that case doesn't benefit users
wrt the corruption issue in the *installer* until 24.04.1.)
--
You received this
This looks like a good fix to have for 24.04 release but does not look
beta-critical.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059796
Title:
Other Softw
** Changed in: c2esp (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059157
Title:
proposed-migration for cups 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu1
** Changed in: c2esp (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059281
Title:
libcupsfilters 2.0.0-0ubuntu6 results in aut
The noble release pocket is currently in an inconsistent state because
of rebuilds for CVE-2024-3094. This is not a bug in the pam package.
** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2024-3094
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug
Since this bug report was filed, there has been a security update of
gst-plugins-good1.0 in jammy which built successfully. Closing invalid.
** Changed in: gst-plugins-good1.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch se
** Description changed:
+ SRU Team; the packages for focal-proposed and jammy-proposed are
+ intended as security updates prepared by the Ubuntu Security team (and
+ have built in a ppa with only the security pockets enabled). However,
+ because the fix makes mount rules in apparmor policy be trea
packages are provided on i386 only if they are required for binary
compatibility.
** Changed in: nano (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
anyway, this doesn't need an ubuntu-archive bug, it just needs the
dependency removed.
** Package changed: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) => avahi (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
avahi-autoipd still depends on it. But I was sure I uploaded avahi to
drop it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058242
Title:
Demote isc-dhcp to universe
c2esp autopkgtest still fails with the current cups in noble-proposed -
though it appears to fail differently now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059157
Title:
** Description changed:
- click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on ppc64el,
- s390x.
+ click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on all archs
+ except amd64.
In order to be able to run the tests without all-proposed=1, glib 2.0 is
needed, which is why
Public bug reported:
multiple cups-related packages are having test failures on armhf after time_t
transition.
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/c/c2esp/noble/armhf
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-browsed/2.0.0-0ubuntu9
I am suspecting a common cups-based issue.
cups-browsed alr
marking critical because these packages are being allowed into the
release pocket as-is but the printing stack may be broken, which is of
high importance in a server/embedded context.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib
privoxy rebuild fails in containers with the same issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058866
Title:
proposed-migration for cups-browsed 2.0.0-0ubuntu8
Thanks! Since this issue was seen only with the package in -proposed,
I'm closing this bug.
There are other unrelated test failures now blocking the build on
armhf. I will open a separate bug for these.
** Changed in: cups-browsed (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Change
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 05:16:57AM -, John Johansen wrote:
> Do we know if there is a difference in the kernel between the runs?
> The 2.0.0.0~0ubuntu3 autopackage run log I was pointed at was on a
> Linux 5.4.0-170-generic #188-Ubuntu
> Do we know what kernel that 2.0.0-0ubuntu7 is failing
cupsd 2.0.0-0ubuntu8 contains no sourceful changes vs 2.0.0-0ubuntu3 in
noble release; these are no-change rebuilds only.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058
788055 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r"
fsuid=1000110 ouid=100
So this is a regression wrt cups-browsed running under apparmor in a
container, and not specific to armhf.
** Changed in: cups-browsed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecid
[1724567.629003] audit: type=1400 audit(1711133926.877:813):
apparmor="DENIED" operation="file_mmap" class="file"
namespace="root//lxd-noble-armhf_"
profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed"
pid=876865 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="rm" denied_mask="rm"
fsuid=1000110 ouid=
Public bug reported:
click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on armhf,
and possibly on all archs.
armhf binary will be removed from the release pocket.
** Affects: click (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: update-excuse
** Description changed:
mesa bootstrap had not been unwound all the way. Fixed mesa is building
now.
** Package changed: auto-multiple-choice (Ubuntu) => mesa (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langase
** Package changed: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-raspi-settings
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057822
Title:
Removing irqbalance disables p
FFe granted
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056496
Title:
[FFe] AppArmor 4.0-beta2 + promp
** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status:
I've sponsored this for noble. For the SRUs, I would like to see a test
case explicitly included that says you will regression-test this on
other bluetooth pairings on other devices: the patch is not a platform-
specific quirk, it is a change to generic bluetooth code, so there
should be explicit
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055806
T
The verification of the Stable Release Update for debootstrap has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encount
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:19:40AM -, Frank Heimes wrote:
> Fix Committed with having:
> pam | 1.5.3-4ubuntu1 | noble-proposed | source
FTR this has been temporarily reverted, but it will be fix-committed again
shortly
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
** Description changed:
[Impact]
The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap
for Noble Numbat.
Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin, /lib,
/lib64 and /sbin) in base-files 13ubuntu7. According to debootstrap.log,
it fails to extra
i386 is not supported as a standalone architecture in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: kbd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kbd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052399
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 07:13:30PM -, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Steve - it is a server package for hosting a web key server, it's
> entirely reasonable for it to depend on a mail transport agent. A WKS
> server, upon uploading a key, sends confirmation emails to the UID
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7
Status in base-files
What is the rationale for a gpg package pulling in an MTA at all? I
think this needs assessed.
** Changed in: gnupg2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https:
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstra
Belated response, but just for the record, Paride's recounting of upstream's
position in the context of the Debian decision was definitive for me:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:47:56AM -, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Back in the day I asked upstream their take on irqbalance usefulness
> with newer ke
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:51:46PM -, Philip Roche wrote:
> @vorlon @jchittum @paelzer given the above findings are you still -1 on
> any snap preseeding? Based on the data, I vote not to preseed any snaps.
That is my position. Thanks for bringing data to this!
--
You received this bug noti
tmp -type f -mtime +30 | wc -l
130319
$ sudo find /tmp -atime +30 | wc -l
8
$ sudo find /tmp -ctime +30 | wc -l
744
$
So at least on desktop I have something that is regularly changing
ctime/atime on the contents of /tmp and therefore preventing them from being
garbage collected...
--
Ste
You say "Nick's preference", but it's Nick who took the position here
that the default behavior should not change?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019026
Tit
> This is a significant difference and for a workload we intend to remain as a
> core tested
> and tracked workload. As such I propose we re-introduce core22 and snapd
> snaps to our seed.
I disagree that the image should be optimized by default to prioritize
the one-time startup performance of
$ git tag --contains 85c975df2c2
v9.1
v9.2
v9.3
v9.4
$ git tag --contains 92cb8427c53
v9.1
v9.2
v9.3
v9.4
$
Ubuntu 23.10 includes coreutils 9.1, 24.04 LTS will include coreutils
9.4. So this bug is fixed in the latest release of Ubuntu.
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed
packages in launchpad always build against -proposed. How are you
building this that you're not getting the systemd in proposed?
** Tags removed: regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in
The log output shows that you have pam_tally or pam_tally2 in your pam
configuration. The preinst fails in order to save you from upgrading
and breaking your system, leaving you with a configuration referencing
an obsolete pam module.
The message says:
you are using pam_tally or pam_tally2 in y
Hello Jo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted iptables into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/1.8.7-1ubuntu5.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted dnsmasq into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/2.86-1.1ubuntu0.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
Hello Alfred, or anyone else affected,
Accepted dnsmasq into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/2.86-1.1ubuntu0.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Hello Gil, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https
Hello Adrien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Lunar)
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019856
Title:
Add missing ARM-cores t
1 - 100 of 1028 matches
Mail list logo
