Will do, thanks.Michael Peek
On Thu, 2020-08-20 at 15:10 +, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Hi Michael and thanks for all the digging. If I understand
> correctlythere are two issues here:
> 1. The slapd crash due to the caseExactMatch/caseExactIA5Match typo,
> forwhich you submitted a fix upstream [1
I didn't realize that this was considered unusual. AutoFs integration
has been a critical part of our infrastructure across multiple
departments at our university for decades, starting with NIS/NIS+.
Without AutoFS integration we would be ... very, very sad.
I have filed a bug report w/ Debian a
As a follow-up, I figured out a workaround for the following error that
I reported earlier:
adding new entry "ou=auto.master,dc=example,dc=org"ldap_add: Invalid
syntax (21) additional info: objectClass: value #1 invalid per
syntax
Original steps:
1) Install /etc/ldap/slapd.conf (which include
SORRY -- This is the correct autofs-fixed.schema. That last one was a
file I was poking around with using a schema I found online. The only
difference between this file and the one that ships with autofs-ldap is
"caseExactMatch" -> "caseExactIA5Match".
** Attachment added: "autofs-fixed.schema"
** Attachment added: "Replaced "exactCaseMatch" w/ "exactCaseIA5Match" to fix
bug that caused slapd to crash on startup"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1891548/+attachment/5401476/+files/autofs-fixed.schema
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Attached is an example /etc/ldap/slapd.conf file that I'm working from.
Maybe there's a problem in here somewhere that I'm not catching.
Including it just in case. Database password is "superSecretPassword"
-> "{MD5}Yy8s0xf5ONysHHbtpvA+ig==". The include for
/etc/ldap/schema/autofs.schema has bee
** Attachment added: "LDAP entries to recreate my test setup"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1891548/+attachment/5401474/+files/input.ldif
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in
I have not come across this bug yet in 16.04. It may have been fixed.
Michael
On 10/26/2016 06:08 PM, Joshua Powers wrote:
> ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1003842 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842
I reformatted over 14.04 and installed 16.04 as a fresh start. I use a
slightly customized server install ISO image that includes my own
preseed file for automation. My approach is to start with a bare-b
I'll give it a go and see if any problems occur. Thanks for your help!
Michael
On 04/27/2016 03:21 PM, Thomas Hood wrote:
> That name service does not work properly when dnsmasq is installed is
> most probably due to bug #1003842. If that is the case then if you
> remove 8.8.8.8 from the list of
No, it does not work when dnsmasq is installed. At least, not
reliably. I discovered this when apache2 started ignoring the
configuration for my virtual hosts because it couldn't resolve the
virtual host names. I could reach some hosts, like archive.ubuntu.com
for instance whenever I did an
Ah, I understand now. Sorry.
Michael
On 04/27/2016 12:42 PM, Thomas Hood wrote:
> The answer to the question "shouldn't those DNS servers should be
> included in /etc/resolv.conf regardless of the presence of dnsmasq?" is
> "no". Resolvconf doesn't list any nameserver addresses after any
> loop
sh re-formatted/re-installed 16.04. Under 14.04 this wasn't a
problem. This just started under 16.04. And the contents of my
/etc/network/interfaces hasn't changed from 14.04.
Michael
On 04/27/2016 12:21 PM, msp3k wrote:
> They are specified in /etc/network/interfaces just
They are specified in /etc/network/interfaces just as you instructed,
and the dnsmasq-base package is installed. But when dnsmasq is
installed then resolvconf generates an incorrect /etc/resolv.conf. If I
remove the dnsmasq package then resolvconf works properly and generates
the expected con
Public bug reported:
By default, when installing ubuntu-desktop (and when installing some
other packages as well), apt will also install dnsmasq as a dependency.
When dnsmask is installed, and static IP addresses are used, resolv.conf
creates a nearly empty /etc/resolv.conf file. The file only co
Nevermind. Apparently "systemctl stop " doesn't do what I
thought it should do. Rsyslogd can be stopped with:
systemctl disable rsyslog
systemctl stop rsyslog
After issuing the disable command, the stop command worked as I
expected.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
This is on Ubuntu Server 16.04 beta
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555171
Title:
systemd does not shut down rsyslog
Status in rsyslog package in Ubuntu:
Public bug reported:
This bug is 100% reproducible.
Example output:
Script started on Wed 09 Mar 2016 10:04:42 AM EST
root@flea:/etc/init.d# ps -ef | grep rsyslog
syslog5219 1 0 10:04 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/rsyslogd -n
root 5240 5227 0 10:04 pts/000:00:00 grep --color=au
I tried following one of the links to ubuntu.com, but was told "Sorry,
you are not a member of a group that is allowed to see the data from
error reports."
If you think it's safe to do so, I can reply with the last few links.
Would it be safe to assume that they are listed in a newest-first order
Public bug reported:
sshd crashes several times a day with the following information:
ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/sshd
Package: openssh-server 1:6.6p1-2ubuntu2.3
ProblemType: Crash
Title: sshd crashed with SIGSEGV in _IO_vfprintf_internal()
Architecture: amd64
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
I've been
My understanding is that if you type:
dpkg -l unity
And see the version number 7.2.x, then you have the patch.
Michael Peek
On 03/18/2015 05:11 AM, Jonathan Laserson wrote:
> How do I obtain the fix?
> This still happens.
> I have Ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
>
--
You received this bug notification bec
On 12/10/2014 09:24 PM, Andrea Azzarone wrote:
> Please consider answering the question markes ad *** IMPORTANT *** in the
> description.
>
> 2014-12-11 1:26 GMT+01:00 harrychillboy <1311...@bugs.launchpad.net>:
>
> Bug description:
> *** IMPORTANT **
> If you can reproduce this bug please be s
1) The bug just bit my boss again. Here's the auth.log:
Dec 10 09:13:23 anolis compiz: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet.so):
/lib/security/pam_kwallet.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
Dec 10 09:13:23 anolis compiz: PAM adding faulty module: pam_kwallet.so
Dec 10 09:15
> You need to enable accessibility (e.g. on screen keyabord) from the control
> center.
>
> 2014-12-09 14:56 GMT+01:00 msp3k :
>
>> 1) Maybe I'm just derping, but how do I run gnome-screensaver?
>>
>> $ ps -ef | grep -i screensaver
>> peek 24604 24163
1) Maybe I'm just derping, but how do I run gnome-screensaver?
$ ps -ef | grep -i screensaver
peek 24604 24163 0 08:51 pts/47 00:00:00 grep -i screensaver
$ gnome-screensaver
** (gnome-screensaver:24665): WARNING **: screensaver already running in
this session
2) If this is an LDAP issue,
We use the same setup, and have had the same experiences:
1) LDAP configuration hasn't changed in years
2) Login screen works fine
3) Home areas are served via NFS+automount
4) Problems only appeared after installing 14.04 (we did fresh installs
though, not upgrades)
Michael Peek
On 12/08/2014 03
I must have missed something. Permissions on what path? And what
should the permissions be?
Michael Peek
On 12/06/2014 09:03 AM, Andrea Azzarone wrote:
> We released a fix but it does not work. The one we released was about
> text entry not showing randomly on multimonitor and seems to be fixed
I am using ldap as well.
Out of 80 hosts and 110 users this bug only affects one user on one host.
(Unfortunately that user happens to be one of my bosses.)
It's irregular, but frequent.
Michael Peek
On 12/05/2014 09:06 AM, Andrea Azzarone wrote:
> @Philipp also I just read you are using ldap. T
Light-locker is not installed on our machines.
On 12/01/2014 10:56 AM, LGB [Gábor Lénárt] wrote:
> I don't know if it helps, but I always had problems like "no input field
> for password" or the "double unlock" (if the first problem does not
> occur, unlock presented another unlock field with a si
Out of 90-somethign users this bug only seems to affect one user. (Of
course, that user happens to be one of my bosses...) Because the
problem is hard to reproduce I have a feeling that it'lll be difficult
to track down and fix.
Michael
On 11/03/2014 05:18 PM, Bruce MacNaughton wrote:
&g
When I do that, I get the desktop back, but no dash, launcher, or panel.
On 11/03/2014 08:54 AM, Erik wrote:
> unity --replace
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Bruce MacNaughton
> wrote:
>
>> I have this problem but can access the desktop using SSH. Is there a
>> process I can kill/restart to
I would like to know the answer to that as well. Back in the good 'ol
days the screen lock was a separate process, and "pkill -9
gnome-screensaver" would bring back the desktop. But now...? There is
a process called "/usr/lib/unity/unity-panel-service --lockscreen-mode",
but if I "kill -9" on it
Public bug reported:
After the screen saver kicks in, there is a chance that, upon returning
to the machine, there will be no place to type in a password. (Picture
included.) The bug does not occur regularly, but does occur quite
often.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: ligh
33 matches
Mail list logo
