My personal thoughts are that the proposal is nothing if not carefully
considered...! Lots of great discussion and input. There is plenty of
opportunity for people to provide feedback on whether or how the change
impacts them in ways we were unable to foresee.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:31 PM Chri
Hi Christian,
Thank you, yes I don't disagree with anything you said. There can be no
"one size fits all" and customizing performance tuning will always be
important but I will argue
1. There can be a "one size fits most" at least for desktop client
environments ("general optimization")
2. It may
undreds or thousands of deployments
can have a significant impact, even if the client or operator doesn't
notice much.
ethan
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:35 AM Christian Ehrhardt <
1833...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Hi Ethanay
> > All I can find is a recommendation not to
Does it seem correct to say that the general intention of irqbalance wrt to
system performance is to improve throughput (translating in some cases to a
more responsive system) at a cost of increased processing latency?
If so, then it should be considered and tuned generally with regards to
usage s
Public bug reported:
as per https://github.com/pop-os/default-settings/issues/60
Distribution (run cat /etc/os-release):
$ cat /etc/os-release
NAME="Pop!_OS"
VERSION="19.04"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Pop!_OS 19.04"
VERSION_ID="19.04"
HOME_URL="https://system76.com/pop";
SUPPORT_URL="
(which is to say that comment #47 works for me)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1390625
Title:
mouse cursor gets corrupted
Status in elementary OS:
Fix Rel
I experience this problem running Freya on an intel graphics stack.
However, I use the Scratch text editor a lot. It is configured to "hide
the cursor while typing." If I type a little bit in the text editor to
hide the cursor, the next time I move the cursor, it reappears as
normal.
So consider
For me, it's that the OS leaves insane hardware mfr defaults of hdparm
-B=128 in place even on AC power. I believe this was fixed in 12.04 but is
back for some reason in 14.04 for me... Installing TLP changes to B=254 on
AC and retains the B=128 on battery (with the addition of clustering hdd
wri
Maybe installing TLP is a workaround?
http://askubuntu.com/questions/285434/is-there-a-power-saving-
application-similar-to-jupiter
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pm-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
9 matches
Mail list logo
