Well, yes, AFAICT the lack of escape hatch hasn't been addressed in dh-
python.
** Changed in: dh-python (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu.
https://b
I count 3 requests on current plucky, two of them coming from the
plymouth hook, one of them from the general ubuntu hook (which is also
run for apport).
We could reduce the immediate issue in plymouth by moving both of its
requests into a single 'execute_multiple_root_commands', but you'd still
h
You might want to check /usr/lib/udev/ruled.d as well.
Is it possible for you to boot the updated systems with the old kernel
by any chance?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Alright, I'm taking a rather blunt approach here, so I walked the dep
graph until I got this:
./checkrdepends --no-ports -B 'http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu' -a amd64 -s
plucky -p akonadi-calendar apitrace arc-gui-clients aseba fontmatrix goldendict
kaddressbook kalarm kdesdk kdewebkit kf5-mess
Public bug reported:
The only way for apport-collect to work is if the source package has a
binary of the same name. Otherwise, you get the following feedback:
Package glibc not installed and no hook available, ignoring
** Affects: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: In P
I'll do a glibc upload next week that will take care of this.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
** Tags added: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to x264 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100297
Title:
dlopen(libx264/libde265) fails on armhf with glibc 2.41
Status in glibc package in
** Changed in: postgresql-pllua (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to x264 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100297
Title:
dlopen(libx264/libde265) fa
** Also affects: postgresql-pllua (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: postgresql-pllua (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to x264 in Ubuntu.
** Also affects: openblas (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to x264 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100297
Title:
dlopen(libx264/libde265) fails on
Simple NCRs for the libraries will fix it since binutils now defaults to
non-executable stacks in the absence of the GNU_STACK field, see
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1618944/accepted-binutils-244-2-source-
into-unstable/
** Also affects: x264 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Ne
** Changed in: kmod (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098962
Title:
Merge 33+20240816-2 from Debian sid
Status in
Public bug reported:
New upstream version
** Affects: kmod (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098962
Tit
apport information
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098654/+attachment/5858183/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gcr in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
The crash turns out to be due to a combination of several things:
* the authd patches were disabled in latest src:gnome-shell, including the
definition of the missing key (presumably to make migration easier)
* the binary gnome-shell package could not upgrade through simple `apt upgrade`
due to
My gut feeling is that the following is the cause:
févr. 17 11:09:07 dresden gnome-shell[4485]: Failed to interact with fprintd
service: Error: GSettings key enable-authd-authentication not found in schema
com.ubuntu.login-screen
Stack trace:
_checkKey@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/cor
Attached the logs between the start of GDM and The first whoopsie entry.
** Attachment added: "logs.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcr/+bug/2098654/+attachment/5858186/+files/logs.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098654/+attachment/5858184/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gcr in Ubuntu.
htt
Just in case, I added the apport info for this crash. I'm raising this
to Critical because it completely breaks the ability to log into my
graphical session, especially since it combined with a kernel bug
preventing me from getting to a console.
** Changed in: gcr (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
ProblemType: Bug
ApportVersion: 2.31.0-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 25.04
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-11-13 (96 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64
(20240827.1)
NonfreeKernelMo
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Also affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Changed in: apport
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: apport
Importance: Wishlist => Low
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
You want `snap info snapd`, which indeed redirects to GH even though
it's not possible to file bugs there. Reassigning this to them.
** Also affects: snapd
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: apport (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
To be clear, you'd like for `ubuntu-bug` to return as soon as the GUI shows up?
That change of behavior would break consistency with the UX when there is no
GUI, and would also break any script out there that invokes ubuntu-bug and
expect it not to return immediately.
** Changed in: apport (Ubun
** Package changed: apport (Ubuntu) => gvm (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097736
Title:
A broken service in the repository 24.04(gvm)
Status in g
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097168
Title:
Launchpad can't process crash repor
Also affects: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
After spending a while with ilkermeroc to try and verify the bug, we
actually discovered that the subsequent parsing done by Launchpad of the
apport payload is *expecting* LF endings, and thus breaks down if using
CRLF.
So, to summarize:
apport in -updates fails against qastaging when trying to PU
That sounds good to me, but it'd need to be available relatively
quickly, we'd like to be able to get the package in the candidate images
(first build on Monday). Would that be possible?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subsc
All reported autopkgtest regressions are tmpfail or network failure, it
seems the infra is hiccuping a bit.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
The apport code, through the use of Python's `email` package, isn't HTTP
1.1 compliant when crafting the payload to the LP +storeblob endpoint,
Verification will need to be done in sync with the LP team as we need to
make sure that we actually have a strict parser available somewhere
(qastaging has also reverted multipart at the moment).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which
It works because the Launchpad team temporarily reverted the changes
that exposed the bug in apport.
The oracular upload is in Unapproved, I'm working on Jammy and Focal
uploads.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t
Public bug reported:
Seen on (at least) the versions in Noble, Oracular and Plucky.
=== FAILURES ===
___ TestApportCheckreports.test_has_no_system_report ___
self =
def test_has_no_system_report(self) -
These are very unlikely to be the same issue, please file a separate bug
against openssl for that specific crash, let's keep this one for the GCC
segfault.
** Also affects: gcc-12 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
(marking apport as Invalid, it's clearly not a bug in the bug reporting
application)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097404
Title:
Segmentation faults occur
Jammy isn't affected either.
** Description changed:
- This might be only in PPAs and/or a recent change in our build
- environment, but when trying to rebuild the package for an upcoming SRU
- I got a nice FTBFS.
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ The package FTBFS on the LP builders due to the cloud build name
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
This doesn't affect builds in Plucky and Oracular. I'm currently trying
on Jammy (was stuck with the LP 'process-upload' segfault thing)
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Tou
By default when fixing something in a release we fix it along the
upgrade path to avoid regressions to upgrading users ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209632
Public bug reported:
This might be only in PPAs and/or a recent change in our build
environment, but when trying to rebuild the package for an upcoming SRU
I got a nice FTBFS.
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/773820283/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-
amd64.apport_2.28.1-0ubuntu3.4~ppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz
The
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ The apport code, through the use of Python's `email` package, isn't HTTP
+ 1.1 compliant when crafting the payload to the LP +storeblob endpoint,
+ using LF as a line separator rather than CRLF.
+
+ A recent update to the `multipart` dependency of LP made
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Jammy)
Im
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096327
Title:
apport cannot upload blobs to launchpad
Targeting for 24.04.2 for apport because we really want the fix in ISOs
before we can remove the workaround on LP.
There is a non-trivial amount of bugs that happen either before or
during the initial update of installed systems, and having the bug
reporter *crash* is a terrible user experience.
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096327
Title:
apport cannot upload blobs to launchpad -
Marking this for further discussion and schedule a proper fix (i.e.
someone needs to write up the fix and appropriate tests, and try it by
forcing gnome-shell to commit suicide rather than in my completely
artificial reproducer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
And after a bit of investigation, the following snippet seems to detect that we
don't have a valid backend:
```
if Gdk.Display.get_default() is None:
exit(-1)
```
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Confirmed
** Tags added: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug noti
Huh, I realize I didn't actually write my conclusions beforehand:
This seems to happen on crashes of the desktop environment itself, e.g.
gnome-shell. While it'd be nice for GTK to bubble up a proper exception
for us to catch, we probably can do better than that.
Easy reproducer:
WAYLAND_DISPLAY=
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2006981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2006981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2006981
apport-gtk crashed with signal 5 in g_log_writer_default()
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pa
I'm thinking that maybe in the new workflow described in bug 2087535 we
should incorporate a check for a viable GUI environment.
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whi
** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to busybox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2090999
Title:
Please merge busybox 1:1.37.0-4 i
Is needrestart installed on your test container? If so, can you try with
it removed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093081
Title:
Installing many packages
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2087827
Title:
Pam includes does not look in /usr/lib/pam.d
Status
Public bug reported:
Currently, if you want to enable sources, you need to enter the option
twice, otherwise you're treated to a somewhat confusing error message
(assuming you patched python-apt with https://salsa.debian.org/apt-
team/python-apt/-/merge_requests/99):
```
❯ sudo add-apt-repository
Before uploading this (and shadow in bug 2089923) could you post a TL;DR
of the discussions in Debian that led to the migration of login from
shadow to util-linux? I think such a change warrants a broader public
discussion :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Note that while the range 0-65534 works for "normal" groups, there are
some use cases outside of that range besides the usual container
mapping, e.g. Active Directory users, so we can't change our default
value to it.
In the short term I will revert the setcap removal from iputils, but I'd
love to
We've actually picked it up and have worked on it with Benjamin last
Friday. There's indeed a problem with the proposed fix, we tweaked it a
little bit, see
https://github.com/canonical/apport/pull/412/commits/6cae24599b689904d45fc9281777f375a1aa5d44
(now we're busy trying to actually have test co
** Description changed:
iputils-ping 3:20240905-1 removed the setcap from the binary, under the
assumption that you don't need special privileges to open ICMP sockets
(as introduced in 2011 in the kernel). However, that only is true if you
have "net.ipv4.ping_group_range = 0 2147483647"
Public bug reported:
iputils-ping 3:20240905-1 removed the setcap from the binary, under the
assumption that you don't need special privileges to open ICMP sockets
(as introduced in 2011 in the kernel). However, that only is true if you
have "net.ipv4.ping_group_range = 0 2147483647" (or similar
This is being worked on in https://github.com/canonical/apport/pull/406
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089387
Title:
Apport test suite fails with new iputi
Public bug reported:
The test suite fails because it assumes that ping is setuid or at least
setcap. It's not the case anymore in Plucky.
** Affects: apport
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: In Progress
** Aff
Unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors as AFAICT there is nothing for us to do
here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tar in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059734
Title:
Tar fails to extract archives that in
Fair enough, I guess :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076269
Title:
invalid base64 encoded gzip data on s390x causes autopkgtest failures
Status in Appor
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2087827
Title:
Pam includes does not look in /usr/lib/pam.d
Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
N
I'll merge the "fix" but I'm a bit worried that the underlying encoding
isn't stable?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076269
Title:
invalid base64 encoded g
I'm being told by my producers that we need to update the crash counter
logic to take the .seen and .upload files into account. And I guess
we'll need to update whoopsie as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
I have a proposal to make things a bit more robust:
0/ Change crash report producers to create new files rather than
overwriting the content of existing ones.
1/ When starting the GUI process, we open the crash file and take out a
lock on it. If the lock is already held, we simply skip the file.
FYI, we have stumbled across the same looping bug at Ubuntu Summit 2024,
and have come up with another possible culprit detailed in bug 2087535
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Public bug reported:
The mechanism used by apport/update-notifier to prompt the user when a
crash occurs is both buggy and fragile.
It's buggy because it suffers from a pretty big TOCTOU race, with a
sizeable gap between the "check if seen" and "mark as seen" steps where
apport collects some data
** Also affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085775
Title:
In 24.04 overwriting a file is
Ugh, blast from the past.
1/ That output, while very probably a bug, is not a regression, as it
was already present in Jammy. Given my lack of familiarity with the
upstream code, I didn't even try to find out what was going there and
instead focused on my task :)
2/ It's a bug in the test plan (I
Uploaded, thanks (with some rich history as a bonus ;-) )
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083302
Title:
lvm2 ftbfs against autoconf 2.72
Status in lvm2 packa
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083302
Title:
lvm2 ftbfs against autoc
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044104
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] chzdev -e is rebuil
See https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/blob/master/NEWS -> release
1.5.3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077712
Title:
lastlog does not capture all logi
Hi,
Thanks for taking the time to report this issue.
Presumably, your boost.asio was not built against the libssl-dev headers
provided in Ubuntu, since in that version those function names aren't
provided as symbols but rather as preprocessor aliases to the more
modern TLS_* alternatives (see
htt
FWIW, it's not a regression as the behaviour is the same in Focal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077883
Title:
usermod silently fails modifying group memb
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1077804
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077804
** Also affects: fink via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077804
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are
I looked at the s390-tools build logs and have verified that the -fno-
omit-frame-pointer flags that were present in the previous build are now
gone on both ppc64el and s390x but not on amd64. In addition,
-mbackchain is present on s390x.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
zlib has just migrate to the release pocket (along with glibc), closing
this bug.
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** Tags removed: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification beca
I checked the gcc packages, and indeed the lib32z1-dev dependency has
been fixed, including in the oracular release pocket. I think we're
hitting a bug in reverse-depends, since it shows up even for riscv64:
❯ reverse-depends -b -a riscv64 lib32z1-dev
Reverse-Build-Depends
=
*
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076898
Title:
Numeric name is accepted as valid u
Public bug reported:
In particular, testing against a version of glibc in -proposed will fail
with the following error:
3784s libc6-dbg : Depends: libc6 (= 2.39-0ubuntu9) but 2.40-1ubuntu1 is
to be installed
(2.39-0ubuntu9 is the version in the release pocket, 2.40-1ubuntu1 is
the one in -propo
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~hectorcao/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+git/shadow/+merge/471145
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076898
Tit
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073992
Title:
Please merge zlib 1:1.3.dfsg+really1.3.1-1 into
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ravi Kant Sharma (ravi-sharma) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073992
Title:
Ple
This is fixed by doko in 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1ubuntu3 but it's currently stuck
in -proposed due to bug 2075567
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in
** Also affects: gcc-14 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: ftbfs update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075567
Title:
Frank, can you confirm that you got in touch with the upstream author
about it?
I probably could "fix" it by sprinkling casts all over the place, which
could be wildly unsafe depending on the exact properties of __int128, or
by actually using a local __int128 variable and memcpy it or something
li
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Tou
This feature should be postponed to the 2.31 version (i.e. the 25.04
cycle), as we don't fully understand the typical usage patterns of
apport-retrace. We're talking about a substantial change, and having it
targeted to 2.30 (which needs to be cut in the coming two weeks) would
be rushing it, even
:
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: s390x
unsat-dependency: gcc-multilib:s390x
** Affects: zlib (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Simon Chopin (schopin)
Status: New
** Tags: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
To help in the development of apport we're using the chaos-marmosets set
of binaries, which triggers various crashes. In particular, we're using
/usr/bin/divide-by-zero which does as its name indicates, which
naturally triggers a native crash.
However, GDB fails on s390x. Not
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~hectorcao/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+git/shadow/+merge/469556
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073338
Tit
Public bug reported:
Despite the distribution having enabled frame pointers globally, the
binaries shipped by libdmapsharing don't have frame pointers.
It is likely due to the build system being pretty screwed up: it builds
the library once using the CFLAGS, then rebuilds it with custom flags
for
** Changed in: apport
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068933
Title:
all reports with LaunchpadPrivate in them are tagged
The issue was introduced with https://github.com/shadow-
maint/shadow/pull/237
Basically, the previous group validation was done using glibc's getgrid
directly, which was presumably coping well with the RO status of
/etc/group, but that poses consistency problems because you could add a
local user
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063200
Title:
useradd --extrausers --groups tries to lock /etc/group
Status in shadow packa
Quick repro steps:
❯ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:noble shadow
Creating shadow
Starting shadow
❯ lxc exec shadow bash
root@shadow:~# mv /etc /etc_write
root@shadow:~# mkdir /etc
root@shadow:~# mount -o bind,ro /etc_write /etc
root@shadow:~# useradd --extrausers --groups somegroup somenewuser
useradd: c
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063200
Title:
useradd --extraus
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
