[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083020] Re: Backport packages for 24.04.2 HWE stack

2025-01-24 Thread Mario Limonciello
So could this release to updates now then? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libdrm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083020 Title: Backport packages for 24.04.2 HWE stack Status in OEM Priority Pro

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2093824] Re: fwupd crashed with SIGTRAP in g_wakeup_new()

2025-01-12 Thread Mario Limonciello
To me it looks like the crash is in glib. ** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Package changed: fwupd (Ubuntu) => glib2.0 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2085340] Re: Plenty of amdgpu backtraces post resume

2024-10-23 Thread Mario Limonciello
> Now the problem is I can't reproduce this so far. gnome-shell/xwayland randomly exits at some point without any explanation (you can see it just starts broken pipe at 12:31:54, no crash before, I need to find the cause for that and report another bug :( Maybe this: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOM

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2085340] Re: Plenty of amdgpu backtraces post resume

2024-10-22 Thread Mario Limonciello
> Attaching the Journal, the initial crash can be seen at 12:31:54, lots going on there, but nothing root-causing this. [ 3300.659129] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 65823 at drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/gpio/gpio_service.c:315 dal_gpio_service_open+0x1b6/0x270 [amdgpu] This is the assertion yo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083538] Re: amdgpu: [mmhub] page fault (src_id:0 ring:8 vmid:6 pasid:32781 / Fence fallback timer expired on ring sdma0

2024-10-09 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083538 Title: amdgpu: [mmhub] page fault (src_id:0 ring:8 vmid:6 p

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083538] Re: amdgpu: [mmhub] page fault (src_id:0 ring:8 vmid:6 pasid:32781 / Fence fallback timer expired on ring sdma0

2024-10-07 Thread Mario Limonciello
> but the GPU restarts are failing and the driver apparently deadlocks or something (quite a bunch of mutex backtraces). Yes; poor clean up/recovery should be tracked as a separate bug report at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083538] Re: amdgpu: [mmhub] page fault (src_id:0 ring:8 vmid:6 pasid:32781 / Fence fallback timer expired on ring sdma0

2024-10-04 Thread Mario Limonciello
Possibly the same issue as fixed in mesa 24.1 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/11138 Please uprev mesa in the snap and see if it helps. ** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues #11138 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/11138 -- You receiv

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083538] Re: amdgpu: [mmhub] page fault (src_id:0 ring:8 vmid:6 pasid:32781 / Fence fallback timer expired on ring sdma0

2024-10-04 Thread Mario Limonciello
Can you check that? Was this maybe when the snap refreshed silently in background? Or try a version without snap so you could use the host mesa? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083538] Re: amdgpu: [mmhub] page fault (src_id:0 ring:8 vmid:6 pasid:32781 / Fence fallback timer expired on ring sdma0

2024-10-03 Thread Mario Limonciello
This is most likely a mesa issue. Have you upgraded mesa recently to match when it showed up? ** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078573] Re: I can no longer boot from my Thunderbolt disk

2024-09-09 Thread Mario Limonciello
Thanks for checking. I believe what's going on is that it resets the topology, but the policy to re-authorize it doesn't happen because bolt is missing until the rootfs is loaded. So initramfs needs a hook to include bolt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078573] Re: I can no longer boot from my Thunderbolt disk

2024-09-06 Thread Mario Limonciello
Thanks for confirming it. You can also try to add thunderbolt to /etc/initramfs-tools/modules to see if that's enough to fix the issue instead of the kernel command line workaround. I suspect it's not though, and that a hook will be needed to add: * /lib/udev/rules/90-bolt.rules * bolt.service *

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078573] Re: I can no longer boot from my Thunderbolt disk

2024-08-31 Thread Mario Limonciello
Try adding thunderbolt.host_reset=0 to your kernel command line. Suspect it's the changes that came in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/6.8.0-38.38: - thunderbolt: Introduce tb_port_reset() - thunderbolt: Introduce tb_path_deactivate_hop() - thunderbolt: Make tb_switch_reset(

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2077490] Re: Error: out of memory while booting after installing the linux-firmware in proposed

2024-08-22 Thread Mario Limonciello
Perhaps a dumb question - but why even bother to put any of the GPU binaries in the initramfs? There should be a good enough display from the pre-boot framebuffer that none of them should be needed with simpledrm. Punt i915.ko, xe.ko, amdgpu.ko, nvidia.ko out of the initramfs and let them get loa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869655] Re: Boot animations start too late to be useful

2024-04-24 Thread Mario Limonciello
> No longer in progress. You can get to 100% fixed by adding kernel parameter 'plymouth.use-simpledrm' but I'm not totally sure that's something everyone will want. The main reasons that can be problematic are rotation right? I wonder if the right way to go about it is a heuristic within plymouth

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061886] [NEW] Under VMWare resolution does not change automaticaly

2024-04-16 Thread Mario Charest
Public bug reported: When resizing a VMWare Workstation, under Ubuntu20 the resolution would change automaticaly. It does not in the Ubuntu 24 Beta. During installation I have enabled download of third party driver. I can see vmtoold running. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061708] Re: Yubikey stopped working after noble upgrade

2024-04-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
According to the upstream bug, this appears to be a new intended behavior with newer gnupg2: https://dev.gnupg.org/T6871 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pcsc-lite in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061708] Re: Yubikey stopped working after noble upgrade

2024-04-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
I managed to get it working as a user by manually starting pcscd.service and with the following to force scdaemon to use it. # cat ~/.gnupg/scdaemon.conf card-timeout 5 disable-ccid To me this seems to be a regression in behavior from 2.2.27-3ubuntu2.1 to 2.4.4-2ubuntu17. ** Bug watch added: g

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061708] [NEW] Yubikey stopped working after noble upgrade

2024-04-15 Thread Mario Limonciello
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 22.04 I used by GPG key stored on a Yubikey smart card, but since upgrading to Noble I get the following trying to access it. $ gpg --card-status gpg: selecting card failed: No such device gpg: OpenPGP card not available: No such device If I run this as root it wo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-03-13 Thread Mario Limonciello
Can you double check the framebuffer FB related conf options in your kconfig against those in Fedora? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970069 Title: Annoyin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-03-13 Thread Mario Limonciello
The backend is a framebuffer driver. For example efifb which uses the framebuffer set up by GOP in pre-boot. If there are framebuffer drivers in tinydrm then maybe they matter for those architectures. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2057684] [NEW] Backport a fix from Pulseaudio 17 to fix playback timing problems affecting GStreamer and other pulseaudio and pipewire audio clients

2024-03-12 Thread Mario Kleiner
untu 22.04-LTS to fix many more bugs, but apparently that is too late now, according to https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+question/709476 Thanks, -mario ** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: gstreamer pipewire pulseaudio so

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056079] Re: Serious playback timing problems affecting GStreamer and other pulseaudio and pipewire audio clients

2024-03-08 Thread Mario Kleiner
n great to get Pulseaudio upgraded to version 17 for upcoming Ubuntu 22.04-LTS to fix many more bugs, but apparently that is too late now, according to https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+question/709476 Thanks, -mario To manage notifications about this bug go

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-03-07 Thread Mario Limonciello
Even if FRAMEBUFFER=Y wasn't added, I think that a change to stop adding all those other drm drivers makes a lot of sense. No use doubling the initrd size for the LUKS case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to syst

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-03-06 Thread Mario Limonciello
AFAICT; these initramfs-tools package changes would cover it: * hooks/framebuffer can be totally removed. * scripts/init-top/framebuffer should probably stay * conf/initramfs.conf needs FRAMEBUFFER=y added to it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch see

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-03-06 Thread Mario Limonciello
Plymouth only gets added to the initrd when LUKS is enabled or you mark another reason for needing the framebuffer. So the suggestion I have from comment #49 is to mark needing the framebuffer by default, and then stop including any DRM modules because simpledrm is built into the kernel. -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056079] [NEW] Serious playback timing problems affecting GStreamer and other pulseaudio and pipewire audio clients

2024-03-04 Thread Mario Kleiner
.04-LTS to fix many more bugs, but apparently that is too late now, according to https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+question/709476 Thanks, -mario ** Affects: gst-plugins-good Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: pipewire Importance: Unknown

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053207] Re: glib requires gobject-introspection >= 1.78.1-13

2024-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
It's marked failed to upload on all architectures right now: INFOgir1.2-glib-2.0-dev_1.78.1-15_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the archive. 1.78.1-15 <= 2.79.1-1 INFOgir1.2-glib-2.0_1.78.1-15_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the archive. 1.78.1-15 <= 2.79.1-1 I guess that me

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-02-01 Thread Mario Limonciello
With your change Fedora and Ubuntu are now behaving relatively similarly. * Both have a deficiency where the handoff from BGRT logo to Plymouth is doing a modeset for some reason. * Due to something in Fedora's GRUB it's a little clearer when GRUB starts. Here's various artifacts if you want to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-02-01 Thread Mario Limonciello
Ah I did have GRUB_TIMEOUT set; I hadn't expected that caused a black screen. Moving that to zero certainly helps. It's a lot better; but still not perfect. Let me get things back to as close as possible to stock and capture logs and a videos to compare with Ubuntu and Fedora with this exact sam

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-02-01 Thread Mario Limonciello
I tested it on Noble with a hand built kernel and it at least does what you planned (don't see any console messages), but also I'm not seeing the OEM vendor logo stick all the way through. There's a really long time of a black screen. Not sure if this is because it was an upstream kernel and it's

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-01-31 Thread Mario Limonciello
You could detect both parameters to avoid that corner case. Alternatively this is something I feel simpledrm will help you avoid hitting too. Otherwise it sounds good to me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sys

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-01-30 Thread Mario Limonciello
Yeah; so try forcing plymouth to the Ubuntu initrd like this: echo "FRAMEBUFFER=y" | sudo tee /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/splash Then if you rebuild the initrd you'll end up with plymouth in it. This unfortunately DOUBLES the initramfs size; but it's because it puts all the drm modules in there

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-01-30 Thread Mario Limonciello
Something "big" I notice different is that by default Ubuntu doesn't put plymouth in the initramfs but Fedora does. Maybe plymouthd really isn't running at the time systemd-fsckd is running. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-01-30 Thread Mario Limonciello
> I don't really know if Fedora does that better or they just failed to notice the bug. I have Fedora 39 and Ubuntu both set up on a Z13 and Plymouth comes up in Fedora with simpledrm; never see the console. That's why I was thinking something might be missing and worth looking at. * Fedora doe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-01-30 Thread Mario Limonciello
Have you already looked at everything Fedora is doing in this area? They already have simpledrm; but from what you described I would have thought they should still lose the fbcon race. Is it just that they don't have systemd-fsckd patch? I would think they still end up showing ERR/WARN kernel mes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970069] Re: Annoying boot messages interfering with splash screen

2024-01-30 Thread Mario Limonciello
> But the feature would still be gated on the "splash" kernel parameter which is Plymouth-specific and may cause pushback from kernel developers. If the patch is the way you go another idea for you is to use the "quiet" keyword to key off instead for this behavior which is already used by the kern

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046646] Re: package fwupd 1.7.9-1~22.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed fwupd package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127

2023-12-26 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Package changed: fwupd (Ubuntu) => initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046646 Title: package fwupd 1.7.9-1~22.04.3 failed t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043640] Re: amdgpu: GPU Recovery fails, frequent hangs

2023-12-09 Thread Mario Limonciello
This is the same issue as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045573 Here is a commit that fixes the issue by changing default pre-emption policy since the kernel can't know about your mesa version. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/d6a57588666301acd9d42d3b00d74240964f07f

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044043] [NEW] package cups-ppdc 2.3.1-9ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso dpkg-deb --control devolvió el código de salida de error 2

2023-11-20 Thread Mario
Public bug reported: While upgrading procedure abort ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: cups-ppdc 2.3.1-9ubuntu1.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-89.99~20.04.1-generic 5.15.126 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-89-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.27 AptOrdering: libx

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044038] [NEW] package libx11-6 2:1.6.9-2ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --control subprocess returned error exit status 2

2023-11-20 Thread Mario
Public bug reported: While updating ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libx11-6 2:1.6.9-2ubuntu1.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-88.98~20.04.1-generic 5.15.126 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-88-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.25 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5Check

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044039] [NEW] package libavahi-glib1 0.7-4ubuntu7.1 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --control subprocess returned error exit status 2

2023-11-20 Thread Mario
Public bug reported: While updating ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libavahi-glib1 0.7-4ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-88.98~20.04.1-generic 5.15.126 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-88-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5Che

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044040] [NEW] package libx11-6 2:1.6.9-2ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --control subprocess returned error exit status 2

2023-11-20 Thread Mario
Public bug reported: bugs while updating ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libx11-6 2:1.6.9-2ubuntu1.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-88.98~20.04.1-generic 5.15.126 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-88-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.25 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043640] Re: amdgpu: GPU Recovery fails, frequent hangs

2023-11-17 Thread Mario Limonciello
I've published a PPA here: https://launchpad.net/~superm1/+archive/ubuntu/gitlab2971/+packages This has builds both for 22.04 (Jammy) and 23.04 (Lunar). Please upgrade to that, drop the module parameter and see if things improve. # sudo add-apt-repository ppa:superm1/gitlab2971 # sudo apt upgrad

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043640] Re: amdgpu: GPU Recovery fails, frequent hangs

2023-11-17 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Also affects: mutter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Package changed: mutter (Ubuntu) => mesa (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2042054] Re: 22.04.3, zen 4 7840, screen turn white exception

2023-11-03 Thread Mario Limonciello
From the upstream bug this is caused by PSR, so it's not a mesa issue. ** No longer affects: mesa (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: mesa (Ubuntu Jammy) ** No longer affects: mesa (Ubuntu Lunar) ** No longer affects: mesa (Ubuntu Mantic) ** No longer affects: mesa (Ubuntu Noble) -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2042054] Re: 22.04.3, zen 4 7840, screen turn white exception

2023-10-31 Thread Mario Limonciello
It's unclear if this is a BIOS, mesa or kernel bug at this time, but it's certainly not an Xorg bug as it was reproduced in Wayland. ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues #2954 https://gitlab.free

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2042054] Re: 22.04.3, zen 4 7840, screen turn white exception

2023-10-31 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => mesa (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042054 Title: 22.04.3, zen 4 7840, screen turn white exception Status in m

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039868] Re: amdgpu reset during usage of firefox

2023-10-20 Thread Mario Limonciello
6.5.6 has the fix for preemption issue, it should get fixed when stable updates come in Mantic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039868 Title: amdgpu reset dur

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037641] Re: amdgpu: [gfxhub0] no-retry page fault

2023-10-05 Thread Mario Limonciello
Ok in this case can you please open an upstream mesa bug? ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037672] Re: amdgpu: [gfxhub] page fault when switching a video to or from fullscreen

2023-10-04 Thread Mario Limonciello
Also - can you still repro with mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu2? This just landed right after you reported this issue. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you ar

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037641] Re: amdgpu: [gfxhub0] no-retry page fault

2023-10-04 Thread Mario Limonciello
I'd say that's very likely. That mesa upgrade just landed in the archive a few days ago and the trace you reported looks more like how a mesa bug manifests. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You r

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037641] Re: amdgpu: [gfxhub0] no-retry page fault

2023-10-03 Thread Mario Limonciello
Are you up to date on the current version of mesa in 23.10? 23.2.1-1ubuntu2? ** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1987792] Re: Totem and VLC crash when playing dvd with VAAPI radeon mesa drivers

2023-09-29 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987792 Title: Totem and VLC crash when playing dvd with VAAPI ra

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2016435] Re: amdgpu driver randomly resets

2023-09-29 Thread Mario Limonciello
Random resets are "typically" triggered by mesa or application bugs. Can you still trigger them in the latest mantic (which has a more up to date mesa and kernel)? ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: New => In

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1094959] Re: package libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade

2023-09-29 Thread Mario Limonciello
> NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Nothing that will be done in mesa for an issue with fglrx anyway these days. ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to m

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037672] Re: amdgpu: [gfxhub] page fault when switching a video to or from fullscreen

2023-09-29 Thread Mario Limonciello
In this case the kernel is the "messenger" for the page fault. This is more likely to be a mesa or application issue than a kernel issue. Can you please raise a ticket to the upstream mesa bug tracker? https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/ ** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037399] Re: Processes keep running after "systemctl stop"

2023-09-29 Thread Mario Emmenlauer
This seems to be a related problem: Sep 29 07:00:30 hyades systemd[1]: apt-daily-upgrade.service: Unit process 51088 (exim4) remains running after unit stopped. I would think that apt-daily-upgrade relies on exim4 getting actually restarted after an update. If the process remains running, does th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037399] Re: Processes keep running after "systemctl stop"

2023-09-26 Thread Mario Emmenlauer
I'm running systemd:amd64 249.11-0ubuntu3.10 from jammy-updates on Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037399 Title: Processes keep running

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037399] [NEW] Processes keep running after "systemctl stop"

2023-09-26 Thread Mario Emmenlauer
Public bug reported: I have a number of Ubuntu 22.04 installations on various computers. In the last month, I have seen more and more log messages like the following from different systems: ``` systemd[1]: apache2.service: Unit process 70257 (apache2) remains running after unit stopped. systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2033967] Re: Laptop screen blinked, no tty works and 200 dmesg errors per second

2023-09-11 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-hwe-6.2 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-hwe-6.2 (Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2033967] Re: Laptop screen blinked, no tty works and 200 dmesg errors per second

2023-09-06 Thread Mario Limonciello
I believe this likely needs the VCN fixes from https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/9728 backported. ** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues #9728 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/9728 ** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2020604] Re: After Mesa upgrades, Chrome won't show graphics

2023-05-31 Thread Mario Limonciello
I believe the same thing can likely happen if llvm updates but mesa stays the same. Can you embed both into the string? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020604 T

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2020604] Re: After mesa upgrades, Chrome won't show graphics

2023-05-26 Thread Mario Limonciello
It seems a way that this may be avoided is for GL_RENDERER string to always be updated when mesa updates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020604 Title: After

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017142] Re: [jammy] VA-API doesn't work on DCN 3.1.4

2023-05-18 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017142 T

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017142] [NEW] [jammy] VA-API doesn't work on DCN 3.1.4

2023-04-20 Thread Mario Limonciello
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] VA-API decoding doesn't work on DCN 3.1.4. Mesa 22.2.5 includes all the code to support it but is missing the chip ID. The device ID was included in upstream mesa 22.3.1. [ Test Plan ] * Verify that VA-API works using "mpv" or a similar tool that uses VA-API *

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008699] Re: fwupd-refresh.service always fails after hibernate

2023-02-27 Thread Mario Limonciello
> Where? /usr/lib/systemd/system/fwupd-refresh.service only has After=network.target. Perhaps that'd be the fix. Ah... this was fixed in upstream already in 1.8.5 release. https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/commit/fe5d93f7d2712f3b708e562a5f7e9be897e04d1d ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Kinetic) I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2008699] Re: fwupd-refresh.service always fails after hibernate

2023-02-27 Thread Mario Limonciello
BTW - fwupd already uses network-online.target for this unit. One could probably argue this is a systemd bug. > [Unit] > Description=Refresh fwupd metadata and update motd > Documentation=man:fwupdmgr(1) > After=network-online.target > > [Service] > Type=oneshot > CacheDirectory=fwupdmgr > Stand

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2004352] [NEW] problema para abrir vídeo

2023-01-31 Thread joao mario
Public bug reported: problema para abrir qualquer vídeo seja com o totem ou usando o opencv, apenas consigo abrir video com ffmpeg ( não se aplica ao opencv ) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10 Package: libgstreamer1.0-0 1.20.3-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-29.30-generic 5.19.17

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991761] Re: Backport packages for 22.04.2 HWE stack

2023-01-17 Thread Mario Limonciello
At least from AMD's tests, backported mesa stack is working properly with RDNA3. Adjusting tag accordingly. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991492] [NEW] Upgrade to version 1.1.0

2022-10-02 Thread Mario Šaško
Public bug reported: Version 1.1.0 (released in March 2022) brings MP3 encoding/decoding support. It would be great if the version here could be updated. ** Affects: libsndfile (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: upgrade-software-version -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981622] Re: mtd device must be supplied (device name is empty)

2022-09-24 Thread Mario
I reported the bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1990723 Seems to affect quite some people (via other discussions), please help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981622] Re: mtd device must be supplied (device name is empty)

2022-09-24 Thread Mario
@dbungert Updated to 249-11-0ubuntu3.6 using normal repository. The error " mtd device must be supplied (device name is empty)" disappeared. [actually with normal sudo apt upgrade nothing was being upgraded saying "The following packages have been kept back: . Solution 2 here did the job https:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981622] Re: mtd device must be supplied (device name is empty)

2022-09-22 Thread Mario
Hi, on 21.09.2022 updating ubuntu broke it with this bug. Running on i386, dell latitude e7450 with ssd and ubuntu22.04.1, kernel 5.15.0-48 generic, x86. After booting, I get the mtd device must be supplied etc etc error, and I am left with a terminal only version. I have an important hint: as s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1988555] [NEW] package libnih-dbus1 1.0.3-6ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Paket libnih-dbus1:amd64 (1.0.3-12build1) mit Feld »Multi-Arch: no« kann nicht zusammen mit libnih-d

2022-09-02 Thread Mario Diem
Public bug reported: Die Paketinstallation ist gescheitert ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: libnih-dbus1 1.0.3-6ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-47.51-generic 5.15.46 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-47-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1 Architecture: amd64 C

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969976] Re: DynamicUser=1 doesn't get along with services that need dbus-daemon

2022-08-09 Thread Mario Limonciello
YC is in the process of doing an SRU for a bunch of other bugs in fwupd and the fix should come in that same SRU I expect. ** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Yosu (yc) ** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: Yosu (yc) => Yuan-Chen Cheng (ycheng-twn) --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969976] Re: DynamicUser=1 doesn't get along with services that need dbus-daemon

2022-07-22 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu Impish) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969976 Title: DynamicUser=1 doesn't get along wi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981109] Re: server image pulls in ModemManager via fwupd, consumes 25MiB RAM in every container

2022-07-08 Thread Mario Limonciello
One possible solution is to split the fwupd package along it's possible plugins into multiple packages. However I tend to agree that it has no use in a cloud or container seed. I also agree libmm-glib0 shouldn't recommend modem manager. ** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969976] Re: DynamicUser=1 doesn't get along with services that need dbus-daemon

2022-05-06 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969976 Title: DynamicUser=1 doesn't get along with servic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928393] Re: linux-firmware 1.197 causes kernel to report error "amdgpu: [gfxhub0] retry page fault"

2022-04-28 Thread Mario Limonciello
Just to correct a few of the targets on this issue. * The reverts mentioned in #30 need to be pulled into linux-firmware for focal. * They're already included in jammy. ** Changed in: amd Status: New => Fix Released ** No longer affects: mesa (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: linux-firmware

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969976] Re: DynamicUser=1 doesn't get along with services that need dbus-daemon

2022-04-25 Thread Mario Limonciello
OK, so upstream here is what we have done (pretty much your suggested W/A). main: https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/commit/7b0d6bc6e03381544e3fb1836c177d492c9d0bbc https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/commit/e90b04d7319874db36c06245ab07858589ce8bc8 https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/commit/f818404d817f6f366998

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2022-04-22 Thread Mario Limonciello
> The comment at https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/3037#issuecomment-1100816992 suggests that disabling the DynamicUser= setting makes the service work again. Maybe that's worth a try, in order to get both problems solved? (i.e. shipping an override config for fwupd) > $cat /etc/systemd/system

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969976] [NEW] DynamicUser=1 doesn't get along with services that need dbus-daemon

2022-04-22 Thread Mario Limonciello
Public bug reported: Updating to systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.16 has caused a regression in Ubuntu 20.04, that fwupd-refresh.service always fails to run. This has been root caused down to the changes in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1871538 Unfortunately this is an ups

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2022-04-20 Thread Mario Limonciello
> https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core- dev/ubuntu/+source/systemd/commit/?id=e3aacfa26e3fc6df369e6f28e740389ae0020907 This appears to have caused a regression in fwupd in Ubuntu 20.04 with details at https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/3037 fwupd-refresh.service uses DynamicUser and now hi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960768] Re: fwupd crash on stop

2022-02-16 Thread Mario Limonciello
> If fwupd is being backported to previous releases of Ubuntu it seems like libgusb would also need to be backported. Actually the bug was introduced in libgusb 0.3.8, fixed in libgusb 0.3.9. If older releases have older than 0.3.8 they shouldn't need libgusb backport. See comment #3. -- You r

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960768] Re: fwupd crash on stop

2022-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: libusb (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libusb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960768] Re: fwupd crash on stop

2022-02-14 Thread Mario Limonciello
Ah probably was caused by https://github.com/hughsie/libgusb/commit/4b52b0cd27fdadcb29b4518cff293c1c76b872a9 in 0.3.8 and fixed by https://github.com/hughsie/libgusb/commit/24934619a2ad3467b98142dfab2039985afc970d in that case. ** Also affects: libgusb (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Stat

[Touch-packages] [Bug 847065] Re: libprotobuf-lite link not created

2022-01-06 Thread Mario Limonciello
** Package changed: protobuf-c (Ubuntu) => protobuf (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/847065 Title: libprotobuf-lite link not created Status in pro

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1561643] Re: initramfs-tools ignores the FRAMEBUFFER option

2021-12-17 Thread Mario Limonciello
** No longer affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561643 Title: initramfs-tools ignores the FRAMEBUFFER option

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1945227] Re: drm/amdgpu: Add support for Yellow Carp

2021-10-05 Thread Mario Limonciello
Verified on YC with the following combination all from -proposed: # dpkg -l | grep "linux-firmware\|linux-image-5.14.0-1005-oem\|21.0.3-0ubuntu0." ii libegl-mesa0:amd64 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.3 amd64free implementation of the EGL API -- Mesa vendor li

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1945227] Re: drm/amdgpu: Add support for Yellow Carp

2021-09-29 Thread Mario Limonciello
With manually placing firmware in /lib/firmware (since SRU not started for that) and using 5.14 kernel confirmed that mesa looks good. Since we don't have linux-firmware SRU package yet and they are combined on this bug report I will not add "verification-done-focal". # glxinfo | grep "OpenGL ren

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1835660] Re: initramfs unpacking failed

2021-07-02 Thread Mario Limonciello
#134: @xnox, have you re-sent it? It looks like https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/14/1091 got no feedback. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835660 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928393] Re: linux-firmware 1.197 causes kernel to report error "amdgpu: [gfxhub0] retry page fault"

2021-06-08 Thread Mario Limonciello
Here's a PPA build with the mesa fix Alex mentioned backported: https://launchpad.net/~superm1/+archive/ubuntu/lp1928393 If you can follow the directions to add that PPA and upgrade to that mesa package you can see if that indeed fixes it. ** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1924814] [NEW] Lag in laptop + ununtu20.04 + dock = 3 Displays

2021-04-16 Thread Mario
Public bug reported: Hi 1) $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS Release:20.04 2) $ apt-cache policy xorg xorg: Installed: 1:7.7+19ubuntu14 Candidate: 1:7.7+19ubuntu14 Version table: *** 1:7.7+19ubuntu14 500 500 http://cl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915579] Re: lvm2 version 2.03.11-2ubuntu1 breaks initramfs

2021-03-04 Thread Mario Schwalbe
@Lukas (#8): Works. 1. Permissions are correct. This was obvious already, since `update-initramfs -v` states that it doesn't execute /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/lvm2 due to insufficient permissions. 2. Unpacked the initramfs and files are included again. 3. Boots. Thanks a lot. -- You re

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915579] Re: lvm2 version 2.03.11-2ubuntu1 breaks initramfs

2021-03-04 Thread Mario Schwalbe
Good morning. Took me an afternoon to figure this out, after no kernel was booting anymore. Still present with version 2.03.11-2ubuntu2 of the package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https://bu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1901173] Re: Updating focal to groovy fails

2020-10-27 Thread Mario Camou
** Package changed: python-defaults (Ubuntu) => update-manager-core (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901173 Title: Updating focal to groovy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1901173] [NEW] Updating focal to groovy fails

2020-10-23 Thread Mario Camou
Public bug reported: Running `do-release-upgrade` from focal to groovy, I got the following crash after the packages were downloaded: ``` apt_pkg.Error: E:Could not configure 'libc6:amd64'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libnss-nis:amd64'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under APT:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1880209] Re: slapd configuration does not ask for olcbackend and doesn't add one. Has to be added by hand.

2020-05-22 Thread Mario Mech
I was just following the documentation on https://ubuntu.com/server/docs /service-ldap and there it is present. It still was on 19.10. So I was just wondering. Sorry! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1880209] [NEW] slapd configuration does not ask for olcbackend and doesn't add one. Has to be added by hand.

2020-05-22 Thread Mario Mech
Public bug reported: Installing slapd and ldap-utils results in missing backend dn: olcBackend={0}mdb,cn=config the installer skips the installation step. Has to be added by ldpamodify. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: slapd 2.4.49+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859308] Re: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Intel Wireless-AC 9260 device is not working

2020-03-06 Thread Mario Vukelic
re-enabling secure boot makes no difference -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859308 Title: software-properties-gtk erroneously reports that Inte

  1   2   3   >