[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

2017-08-17 Thread Major Hayden
Thanks for the deep dive, Elvis! :) Is it possible to adjust some of these settings in the Ubuntu packages, or is just the way it will be going forward? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu. htt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

2017-02-13 Thread Major Hayden
My testing was done on Xen virtual machines, KVM virtual machines, and bare metal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638695 Title: Python 2.7.12 performanc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657837] [NEW] systemd-networkd can't add a VLAN interface to bridge

2017-01-19 Thread Major Hayden
Public bug reported: This is apparently fixed in systemd 231: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd- devel/2016-August/037385.html When systemd tries to put a VLAN interface into a bridge on Xenial, it fails: # journalctl --boot -u systemd-networkd Jan 15 09:16:46 hydrogen systemd[1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

2016-11-10 Thread Major Hayden
Thanks for confirming that, Matthias. Testing with GCC 4.8 seemed to yield (mostly) better results. I put the data into a Google Sheet: https://goo.gl/9gW82j Out of the 10 pyperformance tests: * 3 tests were actually faster with python compiled w/gcc-4.8 * 4 tests were slightly slower (b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

2016-11-03 Thread Major Hayden
I can try that. Just to be clear, you're suggesting to do the following: 1) Install gcc-4.8 on 16.04 2) Compile 2.7.12 with gcc-4.8 on 16.04 3) Re-run tests Did I get that right? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

2016-11-03 Thread Major Hayden
Hello Matthias, I'm sorry for the confusion there. What I meant is that I compiled 2.7.12 on 14.04 and found that it had the same performance as 2.7.6 (from the default Ubuntu python package) on 14.04. I also loaded Xenial's kernel on the 14.04 installation and found no performance difference ei

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] [NEW] Python 2.7.12 performance regression

2016-11-02 Thread Major Hayden
Public bug reported: I work on the OpenStack-Ansible project and we've noticed that testing jobs on 16.04 take quite a bit longer to complete than on 14.04. They complete within an hour on 14.04 but they normally take 90 minutes or more on 16.04. We use the same version of Ansible with both vers