Could you share the contents of /etc/apparmor.d/firefox from your
system?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2110066
Title:
Online Accounts error when adding
** Tags added: sec-6337
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2111205
Title:
fusermount3 profile blocks libfuse module in flatpak
Status in apparmor package in
Updated debdiff with changelog updated based on feedback.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
This SRU contains fixes for a number of bugs:
- * The unprivileged_userns profile did not have access to the root directory
(https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/505)
+ * The unprivileg
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
The parser did not handle the norelatime mount flag correctly,
essentially treating its addition to a list of mount flags as a no-op. A
test should also be included to ensure that the behavior is fixed and
not broken again.
[ Test Plan ]
This bug is caught by an
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ The remmina profile is missing a bunch of rules that would be needed in
+ order to allow usage of all its functionality. As such, we will need to
+ pull the remmina profile from Plucky to avoid breaking its usages.
+
+ [ Test Plan
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
The apparmor.d man page contained incorrect information about the
combination of mount options=(list) options in (list), so this
documentation should be fixed, and a test included to ensure that the
documented behavior matches the actual behavior.
[ Test Plan ]
C
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ The openvpn profile lacked permissions to manage DNS settings for pushed
+ DHCP settings (LP: #2107596)
+
+ [ Test Plan ]
+
+ * This test description assumes no access to existing machines that use
OpenVPN. Additional testing of
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
Various commands segfaulted when run from a confined context due to
missing permissions on the binary execution path, and their
corresponding profiles need rules to give m+r permissions for the
binaries themselves.
[ Test Plan ]
* Add the following to a new file
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ iotop-c failed to launch at all due to permission denials in nl_init and
+ missing capabilities in the iotop-c profile.
+
+ [ Test Plan ]
+
+ * Launch iotop-c under sudo (make sure to invoke iotop-c directly instead of
iotop, which might be symlinked t
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
fusermount3 lacked permissions to mount with noatime, which is needed to
use fuse_overlayfs.
[ Test Plan ]
After installation of the new AppArmor version, the machine might need
to be rebooted. If a reboot between installation and test plan execution
is needed fo
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+
+ [ Impact ]
+
Configuration of an OpenVPN client with a "remote some_hostname.local"
rule on Plucky fails because the OpenVPN profile does not allow access
to /run/avahi-daemon/socket for mDNS lookups.
+
+ [ Test Plan ]
+
+ Test plan for th
Public bug reported:
SRU Justification:
[ Impact ]
fusermount3 lacked permissions to mount to /cvmfs subdirectories,
breaking usage of the CernVM FS.
[ Test Plan ]
* The following instructions are adapted from
https://cvmfs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/cpt-quickstart.html
- Install the cvmfs
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ The plasmashell profile was missing the new path to QtWebEngineProcess,
+ causing the entire desktop environment to crash upon attempted usage of
+ the Web Browser widget.
+
+ [ Test Plan ]
+
+ This test needs to be executed on a
or automatically during an batch unattended upgrade) would
result in end users not getting this fix.
[ Other Info ]
This bug was originally reported at
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/505.
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Ryan Lee (rlee287
** Description changed:
SRU Justification:
[ Impact ]
- * lsblk on an s390x system that uses DASD disks shows no output.
-
- * journactl shows lsblk is blocked by apparmor:
-2025-04-15T15:02:26.048075+00:00 s5lp1-gen03 kernel: audit: type=1400
-audit(1744729346.034:270): appar
** Description changed:
SRU Justification:
[ Impact ]
* lsblk on an s390x system that uses DASD disks shows no output.
* journactl shows lsblk is blocked by apparmor:
2025-04-15T15:02:26.048075+00:00 s5lp1-gen03 kernel: audit: type=1400
audit(1744729346.034:270): appar
** Description changed:
SRU Justification:
[ Impact ]
- * lsblk on an s390x system that uses DASD disks shows no output.
-
- * journactl shows lsblk is blocked by apparmor:
-2025-04-15T15:02:26.048075+00:00 s5lp1-gen03 kernel: audit: type=1400
-audit(1744729346.034:270): appa
The root cause of this issue is not related to the unprivileged_userns,
and this was instead an instance of a more general problem we found
involving profiles on applications and rules required for exec
transitions from confined. I'll replace the test plan with one
corresponding to the root cause i
It's not quite correct, because the underlying bug isn't due to the
unprivileged_userns profile but is instead due to the lsblk profile, but
I can fix that part of the text myself.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
** Tags added: sec-6302
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2109707
Title:
apparmor openvpn pritunl problem
Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug d
The proposed uploaded for Plucky is also available at
https://launchpad.net/~rlee287/+archive/ubuntu/apparmor-
staging/+packages in a PPA.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Plucky)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107402
Title:
lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by ap
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
This SRU contains fixes for a number of bugs:
* The unprivileged_userns profile did not have access to the root directory
(https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/505)
* lsblk could not list DASD devices on IBM System Z (LP: #2107402)
* Various commands s
** Tags added: sec-6287
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107727
Title:
iotop-c: Call of nl_init fails due to insufficient rights
Status in apparmor packag
I was able to reproduce and confirm this bug, which will need fixing in
the apparmor package.
In the meantime, you can add the rule "network netlink raw," to
/etc/apparmor.d/local/iotop-c and reboot, as a workaround.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: iotop-c (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Can you please attach logs with AppArmor denial information as well as
additional information (beyond "not working anymore") that could help us
reproduce the failures locally?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ap
Public bug reported:
Configuration of an OpenVPN client with a "remote some_hostname.local"
rule on Plucky fails because the OpenVPN profile does not allow access
to /run/avahi-daemon/socket for mDNS lookups.
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You r
Upon further investigation, it turns out that the remmina profile is
missing other rules as well and needs to be expanded to handle e.g.
keyed SSH connections. As such, we have decided to pull the remmina
profile from Plucky.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
This is a problem with the lsblk profile shipped by AppArmor and not a
problem with the util-linux package. I am not super familiar with IBM z
Systems, but I think the path that would need to be added is
/sys/devices/css0/**. @fheimes could you confirm whether this path
always includes "css0" as op
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107402
Title:
lsblk blocked by apparmor in 25.04
Status
Updating statuses (again) to reflect that there should no longer be an
active wpa_supplicant profile on Plucky, and to request that people
still running into issues attach the contents of their
/etc/apparmor.d/wpa_supplicant, which should no longer exist.
** Changed in: wpa (Ubuntu)
Status:
** Tags added: sec-6112
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106311
Title:
File picker does not work in browsers in Ubuntu 25.04 beta for SSSD
users
Status
Can you please share 1) the version of the AppArmor package you now have
installed, 2) the contents of /etc/apparmor.d/remmina, and 3) the
AppArmor denial log from the syslog (which should have something like
"dbus-daemon[3722]: apparmor="DENIED""?
--
You received this bug notification because yo
Also found by LP: #2102680. Fixes are in Plucky but will need to be
backported to Noble and Oracular
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2105840
Title:
apparmo
cided
Assignee: Ryan Lee (rlee287)
Status: New
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Lee (rlee287)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
Public bug reported:
The default configuration of aa-notify does not have any filtering on
the notifications that it pops up, resulting in notifications that
suggest adding capabilities to unprivileged_userns, circumventing and
breaking the AppArmor userns restrictions. Since Plucky is very close
** Summary changed:
- not able to deploy Plucky Puffin
+ unable to deploy Plucky Puffin due to AppArmor lsblk denials
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2092232
** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apparmor
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
The profile fix will be added as a patch to the version packaged in
Plucky, and should be uploaded into the queue by my EOD tomorrow.
** Tags added: sec-6054
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
Both paths involved should be in the latest lsusb profile - can you
double check the AppArmor package version you have installed and also
include the contents of your /etc/apparmor.d/lsusb?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is su
The corresponding umount rule also needs to be fixed, but otherwise the
diff LGTM
** Tags added: sec-6014
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Lee (rlee287)
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notifi
AIL
==
FAIL: test_sock_dgram (__main__.ApparmorUnixDomainConnect.test_sock_dgram)
Test mediation of file based SOCK_DGRAM connect
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ryan-lee/qrt-test-
Public bug reported:
As reported by https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/302,
execution log ignore and inherit shared the same hotkey (i) in aa-
genprof and aa-logprof, so there is no way to ignore the execution.
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: N
Public bug reported:
As reported in https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/493, the
child profile component of a profile name is not handled correctly by
aa-enforce, resulting in it being stripped.
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Ryan Lee (rlee287
** Tags added: sec-5988
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103524
Title:
lsblk apparmor profile denies block device lookup on Azure
Status in apparmor packa
After a discussion with Alex Murray and John Johansen, we decided on the
following OpenVPN policy adjustments:
- allowing writes to files in the /etc/openvpn, and not just reads
- allowing reads to most of the home directories
- allowing writes to most of the home directories, with an owner restri
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2101909 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101909
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2101909
AppArmor OpenVPN profile blocks access to NetworkManager-OpenVPN imported
certs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Also, I see that you added remmina to LP: #2046844, but the log that you
pasted into the bug report above does not have anything to do with user
namespaces.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
h
Is that the only AppArmor log message being generated, or are there
more?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102033
Title:
remmina blocked by apparmor in Plu
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101869
Title:
apparmor utils tools cannot parse fusermoun
Public bug reported:
The openvpn profile shipped in the AppArmor package in Plucky
(4.1.0~beta5-0ubuntu6 as of time of writing) does not allow access to
the ~/.cert/nm-openvpn, which is needed to allow OpenVPN to use
certificate files imported by NetworkManager. This was reported by
"@zorn-v" upst
** Changed in: apparmor
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Does the imfile module still work correctly despite the denial logs, or
is it unable to perform monitoring as expected?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101180
We'll be packaging up os-prober profiles in the main AppArmor package so
that they're installed by default and so that we can update them more
easily if necessary.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ub
For the record: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476184
has a rationale for why os-prober introduced mount namespaces in the
first place. If we remove the unsharing of the mount namespace, can we
also make sure that os-prober won't fall over if its unmount calls fail?
** Bug watch
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Lee (rlee287)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Lee (rlee287)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100295
Title:
Apparmor settings for fusermount3 break fla
The broken profile located in /etc/apparmor.d/wpa_supplicant should have
been removed by the upgrade to 4.1.0~beta5-0ubuntu5. Was it still there
on your system after the upgrade?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Hi Heinrich,
Could you also confirm how you constructed the above AppArmor profile
for wpa_supplicant? Did you create it based on the broken wpa_supplicant
profile shipped in the earlier AppArmor package, or did you create it
some other way?
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Switching this to "Fix Released" now that the 0ubuntu5 release is out
that disables the profile - feel free to switch back if you're still
encountering issues even on that release.
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification bec
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Lee (rlee287)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098906
Title:
apparmor breaks sbuild with unsha
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098838
Title:
apparmor appears to deny wpasuppl
This breakage is due to the latest AppArmor packaging enabling a
unshare-userns-restrict profile by default. In most cases, this allows
more usage of unshare than before (while limiting the attack surface
exposed by capabilities in unprivileged user namespaces), but sbuild is
one of the cases where
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Lee (rlee287)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
Seems like the new wpa_supplicant protocol will need rules allowing read
access to /sys/devices/pci*:*/*:*:*.*/ieee80211/phy*/** and to allow
dgram socket creation, but there may be other accesses we might have
missed that would be needed to unbreak the profile. For now, we'll
proceed by disabling
As noted in the original Debian bug, this issue is tracked upstream at
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/447.
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues #447
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issue
Public bug reported:
Sometimes, when booting into a Plucky VM (provisioned via virt-manager),
the login screen flickers constantly, rendering the GUI unusable.
Occasionally, the flickering pauses long enough for me to type in the
first few characters of my password, before the flickering starts ag
@Lukas Märdian (slyon), you mentioned delay start
NetworkManager.service, and give us an example as below.
$ cat /etc/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service.d/override.conf
[Service]
ExecStartPre=/usr/bin/sleep 3
But, you know the directory
/etc/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service.d/ isn't there
Sorry, the test SUT need to assemble, we might wait until the system are
available.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083129
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 22
Hi, Ubuntu
Sorry to push you again, is there any updates on this issue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083129
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 22.04.4 Bug]
We did tested a way to recreated those config files under
/run/NetworkManager/system-connections/. After system bootup, we run
/usr/lib/systemd/system-generators/netplan manually and it would created
those config files base on the .yaml file. so it seems like you want do
3 seconds sleep for Network
The reproduce steps is pretty easy, just put I attached file
"00-installer-config (copy).yaml" in comment#1 to /etc/netplan/ and
reboot OS. But you need more NIC interfaces in your system.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is sub
@Lukas and Jeff
Regarding this issue, would you please share us the workable work around if you
can not fix it in the next few days. Since we are going to meet deadline in our
internal project, we need to based on your comment or documents to go
limitation. Many thanks!
--
You received this bu
** Summary changed:
- netplan static IP address assignment use NetworkManager as renderer would be
lost static ip
+ [Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04.4 Bug] netplan static IP address assignment use
NetworkManager as renderer would be lost static ip
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Lee (rlee287)
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in
After rechecking
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/tree/debian/patches/ubuntu
Alex Murray found that this second patch in comment #4 was already
applied in the last upload of the apparmor package, so we don't have to
apply the patch again.
--
You received this bug notification bec
While we're at it, John Johansen also decided to include this patch,
which fixes a critical bug in which the rule priority directives could
destroy permissions for some classes.
** Patch added: "Patch for commit 204c0c5a3a34ac2eb47b863aae20bace48e0ad3c
downloaded from Gitlab"
https://bugs.lau
Gitlab MR has been merged, with commit
c86c87e8868c72e5ab2084b5bf783cd5ca800a9b fixing the ABI break. Patch is
attached.
** Description changed:
Commit 3c825eb001d33bb6f2480c4f78df03aee4c40396 in the Gitlab upstream
adds a field called `execpath` to the `aa_log_record` struct. This field
wa
** Patch added: "Patch of commit c86c87e8868c72e5ab2084b5bf783cd5ca800a9b
downloaded from GitLab"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/2083435/+attachment/5823945/+files/c86c87e8868c72e5ab2084b5bf783cd5ca800a9b.patch
** Description changed:
Commit 3c825eb001d33bb6f2480c4f78df03aee4c403
** Tags added: oracular
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083435
Title:
AppArmor 4.1.0-beta1 contains an ABI break for aa_log_record
Status in AppArmor:
Public bug reported:
There are conflicting values for /run/lock (1755 and 0755) in
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d
Log line:
systemd-tmpfiles[139060]: /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/legacy.conf:13: Duplicate
line for path "/run/lock", ignoring.
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d$ grep "d /run/lock " *
debian.conf:d /run/lock17
** Information type changed from Public Security to Private Security
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Public bug reported:
[Summary]
After updated kernel 5.15.0-1049-intel-iotg to 5.15.0-1050
Sound output device turned to dummy output.
[Steps to reproduce]
1. Install OS image to DUT.
2. Update package from repository(include proposed)
3. Upgrade package from repository(include proposed)
4. After
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051068
Title:
GUI crashed after installed proposed package libegl-m
Sorry for the late reply. Proposed package 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.2
amd64 [installed,automatic], GUI displayed normally, thank you for the
help!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
** Description changed:
[Impact]
OEM-6.1 kernel is missing support for minimum page size of 64k on DG2
(gfx12.5). Mesa 23.2 started using that, so it broke initializing the
gpu on boot, causing a blank screen with no GDM running (with wayland,
and fallback to X failed too).
[Fix]
** Attachment added: "kern.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/2051068/+attachment/5741895/+files/kern.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Public bug reported:
[Summary]
After installed proposed package libegl-mesa0, reboot system.
GUI crashed but still able to access system by ssh.
[Steps to reproduce]
1. Boot into OS
2. sudo apt update
3. sudo apt upgrade
4. After upgrade process finished, reboot system.
5. GUI crashed.
[Expecte
** Patch added: "systemd_249.11-0ubuntu3.12.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2037965/+attachment/5705848/+files/systemd_249.11-0ubuntu3.12.debdiff
** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => null-and-void
** Summary changed:
- [Demo][Experimental] My brightness hot
Public bug reported:
null
** Affects: null-and-void
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Summary changed:
- My brightness hotkey doesn't work on some PC
+ [Demo][Experimental] My brightness hotkey doesn't work on some PC
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
I also got this error when I tried to upgrade. Upon trying 'apt
reinstall linux-firmware' I get the following:
# apt reinstall linux-firmware
The following packages will be REINSTALLED:
linux-firmware
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 3 not
upgraded.
Need t
Public bug reported:
I ran `sudo apt-get remove xrdp` and this error happened.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Debian 12
Package: x11-common 1:7.7+23
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-42.46~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-42-generic x86_64
.tmp.unity_support_test.1:
ApportVers
I see this issue on a fresh install of Ubuntu 22.04, where
"/etc/resolv.conf" exists as a symlink before resolvconf is installed,
creating a dangling symlink in "/etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/original".
I believe the line in resolvconf.postinst that creates the file
cp -a /etc/resolv.conf /etc
Still happens here with xubuntu 22.04.1
Can get it to work by setting env variable TERM to something other than an
xterm.
Eg, this works:
TERM=ansi whiptail --infobox "hello" 10 10; sleep 2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Not sure if this is the best place to help people out understanding if nodes
are impacted.
We already saw 2 different types of impact on our Azure AKS clusters.
- Pod not able to Terminate
- New images being pulled from ACR (or any container registry
Sometimes it was very clear that we saw the
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969460
Title:
software-properties-gtk
I checked software-properties/0.99.22.2 in jammy-proposed and it does
fix the problem.
** Changed in: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: oem-priority
Assignee: (unassigned) => Shih-Yuan Lee (fourdollars)
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: New
1 - 100 of 645 matches
Mail list logo
