@arges
Hi, would you need any more testing from us?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message truncated error for large number of p
** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message trunca
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty verification-needed-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
I tested on Trusty: iproute2_3.12.0-2ubuntu1.1_amd64.deb fixed the bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message truncated error fo
I had a look at the two proposals and could not spot any obvious
mistakes:
- the correct upstream git commit has been cherry-picked
- I don't have any objections to attribution or log messages
Thanks again for shepherding this one through!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I concur with option 2), unnecessary deviation will just cause
confusion.
Regarding the other buffer sizes, the last time I looked they were
mostly OK. The issue reared its head in this particular case because the
netlink message that previously had a pretty constant per-netdev
response size sudde
@nacc
Thanks so much for the explanation. I also found
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/KnowledgeBase#Merge_Proposals_and_Reviewing
that details a bit more of the internal processes. As relative outsiders
to the Ubuntu process, I'd appreciate it very much if you could handle
that part for Moniqu
@nacc I built from source to verify that the one-liner is directly
responsible for fixing and breaking the issue (inherent paranoia). I did
test with the binaries and they worked.
Apologies, I'm unfamiliar with the Ubuntu SRU process as you can
probably see. What exactly is an "MP" and how would o
Yes, I've confirmed it's fixed there.
I build it from the .dsc, and didn't see "Message truncated".
Then, just to make sure, I reverted the patch (changing the buf size to
16384) and the bug was back.
So at least there's been some use in real world of the patch, I hope...
What's the path of lea
This fix has been pulled into CentOS 7.3 and later
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720126
Title:
[ip link] Message truncated error for large number of pas
This bug has already been fixed upstream in the following commit:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/pkg-
iproute.git/commit/?id=72b365e8e0fd5efe1d5c05d04c25950736635cfb
This commit happened between: tags debian/4.3.0-1 and debian/4.6.0-1
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1380803
I'm unfamiliar with where to submit the fix for this bug. Am I
submitting the fix to the wrong forum?
** Patch added: "[PATCH] Fix "Message truncated" issue with many VF's"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1720126/+attachment/4966551/+files/iproute2-fix-netlink-overflow.
A simple one-line patch seems to solve the issue for me:
Index: iproute2-4.3.0/lib/libnetlink.c
===
--- iproute2-4.3.0.orig/lib/libnetlink.c
+++ iproute2-4.3.0/lib/libnetlink.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ int rtnl_dump_filter_l(struct rtnl_ha
13 matches
Mail list logo
