[Touch-packages] [Bug 1464980] Re: protoc can't find shared libaries

2016-05-08 Thread Iustin Pop
The current 2.6.1-1 package has the right dependencies. Can you check with a newer version, or alternatively, can you give the output of the following? apt-cache show protobuf-compiler -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 397287] Re: Using java wrapper package instead of explicit java-6-openjdk

2016-05-08 Thread Iustin Pop
The ant-wrapper script was removed in package 2.4.1-1, and even before removal it doesn't look like it was using explicit paths anymore. As such, marking as fixed, feel free to reopen. ** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification becau

[Touch-packages] [Bug 936729] Re: libprotobuf-dev should include libprotobuf-lite.so symlink

2016-05-08 Thread Iustin Pop
This was fixed in debian package 2.3.1-1, via commit e811c73: Install libprotobuf-lite.{so,la} files in libprotobuf-dev Marking as fixed. ** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 299467] Re: libprotobuf-dev does not include static libraries

2016-05-08 Thread Iustin Pop
This was fixed back in 2010, in debian packaging commit 4055b2e , "Install static libraries in libprotobuf-dev, libprotoc-dev packages", which was included in the 2.3.0-1 package. ** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because yo