Thanks for helping me - yes, that clarifies it.
Maybe exactly the sentence you write here to explain it to me would be
good to have in the --help and man page?
Closer to the root, to me, these things that are referred to as
"symptom" are more an "area of occurence" where the symptoms appear. For
Public bug reported:
After the update to mantis, I have a problem with (at least - i have not
yet researched further issues) Web-Midi applications running in the
browser.
Up to Kernel 6.2 it works just fine (also when downgrading the kernel to
6.2 in mantis)to use https://app.electra.one/
http://
Also, i tried to report this via ubuntu-bug / apport-bug - but this was
impossible, because for me as a user it is impossible to find out, which
package name or PID I must give apport for the app that identifies as
"Ubuntu Software" in the Dock, because there is nothing called "ubuntu-
software" or
Public bug reported:
At every boot (maybe also every new login, haven't tried that), "Ubuntu
Software" pops up and tells me it updated an important component, and
when clicking to review for more information, it's always "UEFI dbx".
I dont think that this thing is always updated (I also didn run
Public bug reported:
the man page of ubuntu-bug/apport-bug (what is the difference? why am I
shown the manpage of apport-bug when typing man ubuntu-bug?) says
running apport-bug without arguments results in showing me a list of
symptoms.
When I try to report a bug in some general program that is
screenshot of the situation
** Attachment added: "IMG_6587.JPG"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/2044124/+attachment/5721679/+files/IMG_6587.JPG
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport
Public bug reported:
ubuntu-bug --help says
$ ubuntu-bug --help
usage: ubuntu-bug [options] [symptom|pid|package|program path|.apport/.crash
file]
which suggest I can type a symptom after "ubuntu-bug" that I want to report.
But doing something like:
$ ubuntu-bug "Ubuntu Software tells me at
Public bug reported:
When trying to report a bug on "Ubuntu Software" I try to use the "-w"
option to select the window of the application
(because I dont know the program or the package name of the application
running with the icon in the dock saying it's "Ubuntu Software", and it
seems impossib
Tried upgrading two computers from 23.04 to 23.10. This happened on both
machines.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033100
Title:
ubuntu upgrade from lu
Public bug reported:
When trying to report a bug on "Ubuntu-Software" (thats the name I start
it from the gnome search). I want to do this by selecting the window of
the application, because the application itself does not tell me it's
name or package.
But after selecting the window I am presente
confirming my guess:
this error occurs when having somehow "exotic" linux-image-* package
names - even thoug dpkg-deb can build them and dpkg is installing them
without compaints, they lead to an error here.
A custom built mainline kernel without special naming can be installed
without triggering
OK, tracking down this stacktrace I found the problem:
it appears that kerneldetection.py fails when I have a custom built mainline
package installed.
that would make this a bug in "ubuntu-drivers-common"
It appears to be irrelevant that I am *running* the standard Ubuntu
generic kernel - the e
Another additional info:
I checked if I can do it on the commandline, but I get a Python
stacktrace instead:
# ubuntu-drivers list
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/ubuntu-drivers", line 513, in
greet()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/click/core.py", line 1128, in __
Another thing i just tried:
I thought *maybe* this problem is because I was running a custom built
mainline kernel and the drivers GUI doesnt want to change a system with
non-original Ubuntu kernel, but I just rebooted in the standard generic
kernel and the problem persists.
--
You received this
ok, sorry it took some time as I was debugging another issue...
Now i would like to go back to the state where nvidia drivers are not
installed and they do not get installed as described so i can create the
debug output, but due to this bug i just reported, I cannot change this
state currently:
h
oh and forgot to say: actiually the same goes for all other nvidia
driver versions that are shown in the list - its about 10 of them.
Whatever i select, the apply button is inactive.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib
Public bug reported:
I want to switch back from the nvidia driver to nouveau.
In the dialog the last row lets me select the Nouveau driver, but the
"apply" button is inactive and doesnt let me apply the change.
There is also no message or anything that would allow me to understand,
why this is t
-properties (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973379
>
> Title:
> "additional drivers" says we are using nvidia drivers but its
Public bug reported:
after selecting the recommended, tested nvidia driver, and restarting
the system as suggested, no nvidia modules are loaded at all, instead
just nouveau kernel modules are loaded and all the nvidia tools confirm
that no nvidia drivers are being used and running.
But starting
Further information:
It seems the behaviour described does not apply to all
applications/windows.
For example when I have "qjackctl" running, I get the changed cursor
that indicates I can chose that windows, and with this window it works
as expected.
The error message in the console appears anyw
Public bug reported:
I want to report a Bug about the application Studio Controls.
As I did it already quite a few times, I run "ubuntu-bug -w", get a
message that I can select the window of the app I want to report a bug
about after closing this message.
I close the message with a click on the
Public bug reported:
When running "ubuntu-bug firefox", it asks me which package of firefox I
want to report the bug for and presents me a choice between the snap and
the deb version.
But the snap version is not actually installed.
I thing it was when I upgraded recently to 21.10, but I switched
ound it now.
Thanks :)
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935076
Title:
ubuntu-bug sends huge amounts of internal data t
> On 2 Aug 2021, at 19:26, Daniel van Vugt <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> It might die soon:
>
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1840
Fair enough. Only took 14 years. Better late than never… :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
The bug that won’t die…
Michi.
> On 2 Aug 2021, at 19:05, Daniel van Vugt <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> ** Tags removed: groovy
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124440
>
> Title:
> [enhancem
Public bug reported:
When running ubuntu-bug -w i get the dialog that tells me to select the
window to report a bug about, but after clicking this window, in the
terminal where I started ubuntu-bug -w, i only get:
(apport-gtk:26977): Gdk-CRITICAL **: 00:11:09.451:
gdk_wayland_window_set_dbus_pr
I tested a bit more.
I tried again with ubuntu-bug -w and selected thunderbird.
Today I directly get a visible and reacting sudo dialog when reporting a
bug for thunderbird.
I am very sure that I did not get this dialog the last time, only as
described the broken unresponsive one. Because I al
Yes I understood that, that's why I explained a bit about jack and that
I never saw an apport activity or the problem with the dmesg dialog
before just because of jackd.
So, I deleted the /var/crash stuff, and locked the screen and back in, as you
suggested, but no problem appeared.
I could pro
port doing something about an jackd crash
recently , and this effect described here never appeared before having used
ubuntu-bug -w yesterday.
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is s
see screenshot - it looks like this after:
* reporting a bug with ubuntu-bug
* locking screen
* logging back in
The dialog does not react on clicks or keyboard input, all input apperas to be
going to the underlying app, firefox here.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2021-07-09 01-43-22.pn
Public bug reported:
I reported two bugs today, and both times, after having finished
reporting the bug, locking my screen, and logging back in, suddenly
there was a dialog asking for my sudo password so it can execute dmesg.
But I could neither hit cancel nor could I enter my password, it
appera
as far as I can see in the bluez package source, the midi option is
enabled now, so it *could* be closed...
But even though it's on, I dont get it working, so I cannot confirm for
sure.
Expectation is: when connecting to a device, I get an alsa sequencer
client, but I dont see that happening.
Bu
And nearly 13 years later, we are still here.
If I have a core file in the Current directory and another run of the
program encounters a fault, the old core (possibly months old) prevents
the current core file from being written. Outstanding!
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Public bug reported:
System-sim package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit
status 2
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-33.36-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-33-generic i686
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
This is the wrong project for that bug. The KDE thumbnailer has nothing
to do with this thumbnailer (which does enforce a size limit).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to thumbnailer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Public bug reported:
Happened during dist-upgrade from 17.04 to 17.10.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: network-manager-config-connectivity-ubuntu 1.8.4-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-42.46-generic 4.10.17
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-42-generic x86_64
ApportVersion:
xorg was auto selected when I used apport and said "freeze"
** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1731031
Title:
Public bug reported:
have captured dmesg just before oops
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4
Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.1
Architectur
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #873032
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873032
** Also affects: findutils (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873032
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification becau
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1722528 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1722528
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1722528
find buffer-overflow with -printf '%T+'
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is s
** Also affects: findutils (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873032
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to findutils in Ubuntu.
https://bug
I can confirm the bug:
There is a blatant stack overflow in the ubuntu 17.10 sources
(findutils-4.6.0+git+20170729):
file "find/print.c", function "static char* format_date", line 614 and following
char fmt[6];
/* a few lines later */
strcpy(fmt, "%Y-%m-%d+%T");
that is string is longer than 5
I just checked the GNU git sources
(https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/findutils.git)
the bug was fixed upstream
commit febde26dd0e66dda5d4060fa29b85443ddc6a865
Author: Bernhard Voelker
Date: Mon Aug 28 23:15:12 2017 +0200
find: avoid buffer-overflow with -printf '%T+'
* find/print
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1573307 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573307
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1573307
wget crashed with SIGSEGV in __memset_avx2()
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which
ot-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
ot-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
otobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
ot-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
otobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
ot-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
otobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
otobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
and a not-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/
otobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
and a not-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/
ot-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
and a not-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/
ot-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
otobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
ot-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
ot-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
---
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options
rivaling
protobuffers version. This problem first occured last week somewhen.
This makes it impossible to use libEGL/libmir and a not-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're going
to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
+ ---
+ .tmp.unity_support_t
it impossible to use libEGL/libmir and a not-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer-vaapi/+bug/1708137/+subsc
ion in one application. Please let me how you're
going to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protobuf/+bug/1708137/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to :
to use libEGL/libmir and a not-default
protobuffers version in one application. Please let me how you're going
to deal with that.
Best,
Henning
** Affects: protobuf (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: libegl libmir protobuffers
--
You received thi
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Michi Henning (michihenning) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1326105
Ti
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Michi Henning (michihenning) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545600
Ti
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Michi Henning (michihenning) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540876
Ti
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Michi Henning (michihenning) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302656
Ti
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Michi Henning (michihenning) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1469770
Ti
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Michi Henning (michihenning) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546364
Title:
Li
Will this update be in zesty?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xkeyboard-config in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655782
Title:
Elfdalian layout + merge with Debian 2.19-1
Status in xkeyboard-confi
Will this get added to Zesty? Right now it is not in the repo:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/zesty/+source/xkeyboard-config and the
feature freeze is the day after tomorrow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xkeyb
> Thumbnailer sounds like something that should already be part of other
snaps, not something that is potentially stand-alone...?
If each snap includes its own thumbnailer, each snap will redundantly
store thumbnails (making the idea of a cache much less useful).
Moreover, all the databases for th
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360247
Title:
JSON format fo
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238979
Title:
[Scopes] Scope result mo
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446216
Title:
[Dash] Categor
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scopes-api in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548718
Title:
Need to update
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michi Henning (michihenning)
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug not
Thanks for that Pete.
>From the build log, I think the issue is simply that gtest changed, and
we need to pull in your cmake fixes. I think we have those in devel
already, but not released yet. I’ll figure it out on Monday :)
Michi.
> On 13 Jan 2017, at 21:09 , Pete Woods <1656...@bugs.launchpa
** Changed in: thumbnailer (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to taglib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640326
Title:
FTBFS on zesty
Status in lev
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu RTM)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-sco
** Summary changed:
- frieza_arm64, staging #99: SD card not mounted
+ SD card not recognized on M10 with ubuntu-touch/staging/ubuntu
** Changed in: mediascanner2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded package
** Also affects: canonical-devices-system-image
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mediascanner2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649313
Title:
Mediascanne
I downloaded the latest image from ubuntu-touch/staging/ubuntu
"OS Build Details" in system settings reports r85, 20161215
Unfortunately, I can't provide the output from system-image-cli because,
since flashing this image, USB is broken. I can no longer get my desktop
to recognize the USB port. I
I just tried with OTA-14, and it works fine there too. However, the
first time I inserted the card, it wasn't recognized. It was only after
I ejected and re-inserted it that it was mounted.
This may just be dodgy connectors in the card slot.
I'll also try with image you linked to.
--
You receiv
It could be just that the card slot is dirty or some such. I would also
try a reboot. Possibly, some other low-level piece of machinery got
stuck. At any rate, I don't think this is a mediascanner problem. If the
card isn't mounted, mediascanner can't possibly see it.
--
You received this bug not
I tried it with build 191 from ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/bq-aquaris-pd.en.
After inserting an SD card with a few music and image files, the music scope
shows the tracks, and gallery app shows all the images on the card.
I'm about to try with OTA 14. But I expect to see the same results.
Can you i
It looks like click-scope is the only scope that is failing. Queries to
the music scope work just fine, as do queries to remote scopes (via
smartscopesproxy). All these scopes run the exact same code in the
runtime.
I have no idea what exactly is going wrong, but I strongly suspect that
it is in c
I've spent pretty much all day trying to track this down. The debug
cycle time with core 16 in a VM doesn't help :-(
What I can see is that crap comes out of the ZmqReceiver when an object
adapter tries to dispatch an incoming request to the scope. The problem
doesn't manifest itself in the same w
@dobey: There is in the log: terminate called after throwing an instance
of 'unity::scopes::MiddlewareException'
I don't know where this exception comes from. It would be great to find
out. I believe that, if an exception is thrown (no matter what kind of
exception) from one of the threads we send
Michael, the command fails because /run/user/0/dbus-session doesn't exist.
I also looks like I have a different version installed. I see 264 and 277
(besides common) in /root/snap/unity8-session.
I adjusted your command to not set DBUS_SESSION_ADDRESS and explicitly
set LD_LIBRARY_PATH (without u
** Also affects: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michi Henning (michihenning)
** Changed in: uni
> "BFB" is "Big Flavorful Button" ;)
Ah, as in "BFG-9000" :-)
> So, from your screenshot it looks like you are hitting case number 2 from my
> previous post. Is
> there a crash report in /var/crash/ for the scoperunner?
/var/crash doesn't exist on a snappy machine. I have no idea where core
dum
There doesn't appear to be a way to be notified of unmount attempts at
the moment. There is an fschange modification about ten years ago
(http://stefan.buettcher.org/cs/fschange/), but that never made it into
the kernel.
It looks like it's impossible for mediascanner to automatically back off
when
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1310186 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310186
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1310186
mediascanner prevents unmounting usb device
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which i
Sorry, I don't know what a "BFB result" is. It does show "Apps". I've
attached a screenshot.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2016-12-08 14-23-54.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1645798/+attachment/477/+files/Screenshot%20from%202016-12-08%2014-23-5
The assertion failure appears to be unrelated to the click scope not showing
any results.
What is interesting is that the other scopes seems to work fine, it's only the
click scope that is empty. With the missing applications dir in place, I'm not
seeing any errors at all in the logs, just the e
Public bug reported:
We just got this test failure on zesty:
https://jenkins.canonical.com/unity-
api-1/job/build-2-binpkg/arch=armhf,release=zesty/1022/consoleFull
Search for "OnlineAccountClientTest.service_update_callback"
In the log, we see
"GDBus.Error:com.google.code.AccountsSSO.SingleSig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1643169 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643169
See comment #2 here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-
scopes-api/+bug/1643169
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1643169
package libunity-scopes1.0:amd64 1.0.7+16.10.20160921-
1 - 100 of 1198 matches
Mail list logo