This issue was added to the Ubuntu 25.04 release notes:
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/plucky-puffin-release-notes/48687#p-120902-systemd-v2574
(this is btw. not limited to ppc64el, but across architectures)
** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Cha
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: s390x
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107402
Title:
lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor i
Hi Ryan, even if the vast majority of systems should have only css0,
I think that there are theoretically higher numbers possible
(according to: https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245444.pdf).
The max amount of CSSes (channel sub-systems) is dependent on the system in use
(i.e. the hw ge
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: s390x
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: util-l
** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2092232
Ti
** No longer affects: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notificati
The apparmor patch can well be what's needed, yes.
And looks like this apparmor version got already released and is the latest in
plucky:
$ rmadison --suite=plucky apparmor
apparmor | 4.1.0~beta5-0ubuntu12 | plucky | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386,
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
Guess we would now n
I just found an updated daily from today:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/20250402/plucky-live-server-ppc64el.iso
Guess it's worth to try this, since it should incl. the fixed apparmor package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seede
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102236
Title:
plucky/s390x does not come up afte
That's great - thx Nick (appreciate it)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102236
Title:
plucky/s390x does not come up after kernel update + reboot, d
I've got a '+1' from IBM (the person who opened LP#2044104).
Hence I transferred the above snippet now to a debdiff, as suggestion.
At enr0n, you may have a look at the debdiff.
Are you already planning a systemd update for plucky, that could be used to
piggyback the fix for this bug?
** Patch a
** Summary changed:
- plucky/s390x (with root disk on dm?) does not come up after kernel update +
reboot
+ plucky/s390x does not come up after kernel update + reboot, due to udev rules
missing in initrd
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in
I think this could be one way to solve this:
diff -U 3 ~/udev_orig /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev
--- /home/ubuntu/udev_orig 2025-03-19 12:36:21.643873203 +
+++ /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev 2025-03-19 12:59:12.031514341
+
@@ -73,7 +73,10 @@
# Skip rules gener
Uh, good catch Nick (with that it looks like it's since oracular ?!)
And yes, the names may indeed look a bit cryptic,
since these are for s390x specific (so called CCW) devices (here in this case
disk devices, but there are more types; cio-ignore is to mask out a range of
CCW devices).
One diff
Uh, good catch Nick (with that it looks like it's since oracular ?!)
And yes, the names may indeed look a bit cryptic,
since these are for s390x specific (so called CCW) devices (here in this case
disk devices, but there are more types; cio-ignore is to mask out a range of
CCW devices).
One diff
Thanks for sharing this Massimiliano.
So your environment is slightly different than mine (you used so called DASD
disks, I used FCP/SCSI LUNs with multipath), BUT the root cause is the same -
the hardware specific rules are not copied into the initrd anymore.
--
You received this bug notificat
(Even if I strongly believe that this is not limited to ppc64el alone,
I'm marking this as affected the IBM Power LP project, since it came in via
this channel.)
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage (ubuntu-power-triage) =>
(unassigned)
** Also
Yes, right.
I just had all components in mind that are related to udev rules in general.
My suspicion was kernel or missing rules in initrd (which would lead to the
initramfs-tools).
dracut is not used, no.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pac
I asked the kernel team already to have a look at this as well, when I
marked it as affecting 'linux (Ubuntu)', it's suspicious.
And no, the disk nodes are missing in /dev.
It's a multipath environment with two HBAs, each two paths,
so there need to be four SCSI devices (sda, sdb, sdc and sdd),
bu
Thx Nick. There is not much I can find when stranded in busybox:
ls -l /sys/block/dm-*
ls: /sys/block/dm-*: No such file or directory
cd /sys/block
ls
loop3 loop5 loop7 loop0 loop2 loop4 loop6 loop1
Also running:
udevadm control --reload && udevadm trigger
doesn't change the situation, no
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-25.04-beta
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102236
Title:
plucky/s390x (with root disk on dm?) does
** Attachment added: "diff_usr-lib-udev-rules.d_24.04.2_and_25.04.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/2102236/+attachment/5865319/+files/diff_usr-lib-udev-rules.d_24.04.2_and_25.04.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded p
There are unfortunately a lot diffs in the area of storage, multipath,
dm and lvm.
So to narrow down things,
I'll first of all check if this also happens if a single (DASD) disk is used,
or multipath without LVM - on 25.04.
If I have a 25.04 system with least complexity where this happens, I will
I started to compare /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/ with the files from 24.04.2
earlier today (I should do with 24.10 though, to have a smaller version
gap).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
I compared the udev rules (themselves, in /etc/udev/rules.d) on plucky with
rules from 24.04 (on the exact same system, installed in the exact same way -
to get the same set of rules), but couldn't find any significant differences.
Looks to me now that this is more caused by the way the events ar
I retried today upgrading to the newer 6.14.0-10 from -proposed,
but unfortunately the same situation after reboot.
** Attachment added: "kernel 6.14.0-10.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2102236/+attachment/5864703/+files/kernel%206.14.0-10.txt
** Tags added: rls-pp-inco
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Public bug reported:
While using the plucky daily from March 12 (that still comes with kernel 6.12)
(and working around LP#2101831, by forcing the installation to not apply any
updates)
I get a system installed, which is at kernel level 6.12.
Since 6.14 is out (in plucky release) since yesterday
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076269
Title:
invalid base64 encoded gzip data on
Thank you 'JREMUS' for the verification!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095372
Title:
[25.04 FEAT] Binutils new IBM Z hardware support
Status in Ubuntu
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085157
Title:
mkinitramfs fails with c
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100598
Title:
[FFe]: re-enable DFLTCC on s390x
Status in Ub
Adding the following two 'includes' again:
#include
#include
allows the build to succeed again.
But doing so seems to be in contrast to what Andreas found in the upstream
release-notes:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2100598/comments/3
--
You received this bug notification be
** Tags added: s390x
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because y
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095372
Title:
[25.04 FEAT] Binutils new IBM Z hardware support
Status
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095361
Title:
[25.04 FEAT] GDB: New IBM Z hardware support
Status in Ubuntu
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096811
Title:
[25.04 FEAT] openSSL MSA 11 HMAC support
Status in Ubuntu
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096949
Title:
[25.04 FEAT] openSSL: support MSA 12 (SHA3)
Status in Ubu
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096810
Title:
[25.04 FEAT] openSSL MSA 10 XTS s
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096810
Title:
[25.04 FEAT] openSSL MSA 10 XTS
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to p11-kit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098092
Title:
[25.04 FEAT] [SEC2324] p11-kit:
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Fix Released
** Also affects: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: New => Fix Release
Many thanks bdrung!
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to p11-kit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098092
Title:
[25.04 FEAT]
I just noticed that
openssl version 3.4.1-1ubuntu1 landed in plucky-proposed
hence updating ticket to Fix Committed.
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which
Test packages are currently being build in this PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2098092
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: p11-kit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Information type changed from Private t
** Patch added:
"debdiff_p11-kit_plucky_from_0.25.5-2ubuntu1_to_0.25.5-2ubuntu2.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2098092/+attachment/5856897/+files/debdiff_p11-kit_plucky_from_0.25.5-2ubuntu1_to_0.25.5-2ubuntu2.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096810
Title:
[25.04 FEAT] openSSL MSA 10 XTS support
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096810
Title:
[25.04 FEAT] openSSL MSA 10 XTS support
Status in Ubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083131
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because
Looks like this issue here is already fixed since (and with) p11-kit v0.23.7,
that had landed in Ubuntu somewhere between xenial and bionic.
Hence closing this bug as Fix Released.
If you think this bug is still present please open a new bug in
Launchpad, based on an Ubuntu version that is in ser
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Invalid => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076269
Title:
invalid base64 encoded gzip data on s39
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083131
Accepted bash into oracular-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/5.2.32-1ubuntu1.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083131
** Also affects: bash (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Also affects: bash (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu Pluck
I now did a more careful validation and installed only the relevant
packages step by step (not doing a full-upgrade of -proposed), and can
only confirm that I was able to successfully verify this bug.
(This way, installing the packages step by step also didn't led to the
issue I saw before with ud
It was a bit tricky to test this, but did it like this:
I installed a 24.10 LPAR with a broken network configuration to do an offline
install (and prevent any updates right during installation).
[For test purposes it would be great to be able to perform offline installs in
a more straight-forwar
** No longer affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Oracular)
** No longer affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initr
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * update-initramfs fails wile running on a multipath system
+(in case multipath-tools-boot package is installed)
+due to issues in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions.
+
+ * copy_libgcc fails due to lack of folder h
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083131
No problem, we can mark this LP bug as duplicate of LP#2083131.
I actually just dit it.
(I'll manually sync between then, not a big deal.)
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2083131
Bash's bu
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085157
Title:
mkinitramfs fails with
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085548
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.10] bash printf of floating poin
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => coreutils (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage (ubuntu-power-triage) =>
(unassigned)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
So let's wait then on the MR and take it from there...
(Just hope it doesn't take that long, due to the consequence of this - failed
to boot 24.10 on s390x).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in
Hi Benjamin,
well I thought about simplifying copy_libgcc too.
But it already has the signature for libdir/library and I didn't wanted to
remove it,
and according to the SRU process I think that changing just the way it is
called is less impact-full than modifying the function itself (body and
s
In Debian's multipath-tools changelog changelog I found for 0.8.8(-1):
"
* [4ab9ce2] Drop old dmsetup_env hack
dmsetup long supports DM_NAME and DM_UUID, and the other variables
are not used anymore.
"
which makes me think that line
copy_exec /usr/lib/udev/dmsetup_env
in
/usr/share/initr
The error:
"mkinitramfs: copy_file: binary '/libgcc_s.so.[1-9]' not found"
can be solved by:
43c43
< copy_libgcc
---
> copy_libgcc $DESTDIR/usr/lib/$(uname -m)-linux-gnu/
Just a bit unsure if there is a better way to specify the arch specific path.
Using dpkg-architecture would req. to have dpkg-
Added multipath-tools (due to multipath-tools-boot) as affected package.
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
** Ta
Line
copy_exec /usr/lib/udev/dmsetup_env
(as well as the one before: copy_exec /usr/sbin/dmsetup)
is in oracular's multipath-tools-boot v0.9.9-1ubuntu3 only, but not in noble's
0.9.4-5ubuntu8 -- the file /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/multipath seem to
differ quite a bit between the two packag
I have no idea what "/usr/lib/udev/dmsetup_env" is all about, since it
is not in oracular, nor in noble, and also does not have a package it
would belong to.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in U
Comparing it with a 24.04 (SAN/SCSI/multipath) installation, update-
initramfs performs like this:
$ sudo update-initramfs -k all -u
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.8.0-47-generic
Using config file '/etc/zipl.conf'
Run /lib/s390-tools//zipl_helper.device-mapper /boot
Building bootm
The 'hook-functions' where the code is included is actually part of
initramfs-tools-core:
dpkg -S /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions
initramfs-tools-core: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions
** Also affects: initramfs-tools
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer af
** Description changed:
- I recently did an 24.10 install (on s390x, but I think this doesn't
- matter) and was surprised that the system hangs during the post-install
- reboot.
+ I recently did an 24.10 install and was surprised that the system hangs
+ during the post-install reboot.
Investi
This is re-createable all time, a system is in place for further
investigation (remote access) and testing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085157
Ti
$ env --unset=LD_PRELOAD ldd /usr/lib/s390x-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
linux-vdso64.so.1 (0x03ffca8fe000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/s390x-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x03ffabd0)
/lib/ld64.so.1 (0x03ffac08)
$
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
modified the hook-functions script (at line 252 ff) a bit to gather some
more details and yes:
$ grep -A 10 "copy_libgcc()" /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions
copy_libgcc() {
local libdir library
libdir="$1"
echo "1" "$1"
for library in "${libdir}"/libgcc_s.
Public bug reported:
I recently did an 24.10 install (on s390x, but I think this doesn't
matter) and was surprised that the system hangs during the post-install
reboot.
Investigation showed that this happens if the installer applies updates,
which is done by default, if there is proper network co
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical LXD team (canonical-lxd)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085127
Title:
lxc/1:5.0.3-2ubuntu
Thanks Andreas for the update and bringing this upstream.
I'll reference the upstream bug with the LP bug meta data to stay informed ...
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
** Tags added: s390x
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
** Tags added: reverse-proxy-bugzilla
--
You r
** Tags added: ppc64el s390x
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083480
Title:
SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and
s390x
Statu
The verification here is to rebuild existing zlib on noble, but explicitly
using the updated 14.2.0-4ubuntu2~24.04.
I verified that it builds fine (on s390x and other archs).
(But since gcc 13 is the default in noble (13.2.0-7ubuntu1), this doesn't
matter that much, it was mostly a problem in ora
** Tags added: petest-446
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044104
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] chzdev -e is rebuilding initramfs even with
zdev:early=0 set
Stat
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044104
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] chzdev -e is rebuilding ini
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075567
Title:
zlib fails to build on s390x on oracular
The fix solves the problem - I tried with a patched gcc-14:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2073786/+sourcepub/16401085/+listing-archive-extra
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
ht
Thanks iii, just saw this a few minutes ago.
Does it makes sense to also add:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a247088adaf122116919235f4a40189506139495
(seems to be a bit related ...)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whi
Patch got upstream accepted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e8a7142a697c5d2673adea33ba23af82a89c9559
It looks to me that it should be picked together with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a247088adaf122116919235f4a40189506139495
--
You received this bug notification
A new upload of the s390-tools package always also requires an upload of the
s390-tools-signed package with the same version as well.
I've attached the debdiff for it here...
** Also affects: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Patch added:
"debdiff_s390-to
Hi Simon, not yet, but I'm pushing for this ...
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: High => Critical
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zl
Public bug reported:
Rebuilding zlib for s390x on oracular fails to build, probably due to
gcc 14 usage (since it became more strict).
Full build log can be found here:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/741961061/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-s390x.zlib_1%3A1.3.dfsg-3.1ubuntu4_BUILDING.txt.gz
erroneous
** Tags added: reverse-proxy-bugzilla s390x
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pack
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional: true" to overcome he ti
I gave ~ppa5 a try on my s390x system.
If I set all interfaces to "optional: true" (incl. encc000), but except
encc000.2653, I don't face the timeout anymore. But if I UNset
"optional: true" for encc000 on top, I tap into the timeout again.
In the past it was okay to NOT have "optional: true" set
I see (deep in my mind I remember that such a discussion happened or at
least started somewhere).
Just notice that one interface is still _not_ optional, here in my case:
encc000
And the behavior changed recently, with the above config I didn not hit
the timeout in the past (even with earlier nob
Included in pam | 1.5.3-5ubuntu3.
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscr
Fix Committed with having:
pam | 1.5.3-4ubuntu1 | noble-proposed | source
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Opinion => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322
Title:
Please consider no more having irq
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982336
Title:
[24.04 FEAT] GDB: Support for new IB
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982336
Title:
[24.04 FEAT] GDB: Support for new IBM
1 - 100 of 698 matches
Mail list logo
