[Touch-packages] [Bug 1371636]

2014-10-04 Thread David Kredba
With Gentoo vanilla binutils 2.24-r3 with two slim LTO patches and the patch referred by Emil Velikov in Comment #3 https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/binutils-2.24 -shared- pie.patch?h=packages/binutils&id=47bdd59a9967ee8dd2bcc47797855185c6471546 it builds fine even

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1371636]

2014-10-04 Thread David Kredba
The same result with gcc 5.0 svn rev. 215679. .eh_frame_hdr table[5712] FDE at 00c45788 overlaps table[5713] FDE at 00c45684. Now I will try older binutils with two gcc versions used before. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1371636]

2014-09-29 Thread David Kredba
patch -p1 < ../../binutils-2.24-shared-pie.patch patching file ld/emultempl/elf32.em Hunk #1 FAILED at 1480. Hunk #2 FAILED at 1504. Hunk #3 FAILED at 1620. 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/emultempl/elf32.em.rej The next patch would create the file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/ehdr_sta

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1371636]

2014-09-29 Thread David Kredba
I tested it with LLVM 3.4.2 and the same set of gcc-4.9.2 (svn) and binutils (svn) used to open this bug report and all built fine. So for me it looks like that LLVM 3.5.0 came with something changed. Is it not a same name of some function, introduced in LLVM 3.5.0 and present in Mesa before? It