[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965328] Re: transient scope could not be started error in bionic lxd container

2025-05-30 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI seeing this one again: arch: s390x host release: noble lxd: installed: 6.3-a85d6a5 (33245) 104MB - snapd: installed: 2.68.4 (24506) 48MB snapd $ lxd stop testkvm-focal-to internal error, please report: running "lxd" failed: transient scope

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2111792] Re: solver pulls in gpgv-from-sq unexpectedly

2025-05-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
adding the requested log file ** Attachment added: "solver log as requested" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/2111792/+attachment/5880565/+files/log.edsp.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2111792] [NEW] solver pulls in gpgv-from-sq unexpectedly

2025-05-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Public bug reported: As reported on bug 2111790 gpgv-from-sq was pulled in. Julian said to cerate a new bug for this aspect [1]. This here is that bug. Original behavior ``` $ sudo apt upgrade The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: gpgv-from-sq gpgv-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2111604] Re: lsblk: failed to get sysfs name: Permission denied

2025-05-23 Thread Christian Kujau
I've created https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1702 but the build pipeline is still in progress. FWIW, I noticed that "iotop-c" command needs some AA tweaking too, and the fix has already been merged upstream: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1675 -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2111604] Re: lsblk: failed to get sysfs name: Permission denied

2025-05-23 Thread Christian Kujau
Gaah, and shortly after submitting this one I remembered that Ubuntu enables AppArmor by default: - $ sudo aa-status apparmor module is loaded. 173 profiles are loaded. 90 profiles are in enforce mode. [...] lsblk $ sudo aa-complain /usr/bin/lsb

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2111604] [NEW] lsblk: failed to get sysfs name: Permission denied

2025-05-23 Thread Christian Kujau
Public bug reported: After upgrading from 24.10 to 25.04 the "lsblk" command (from util- linux) is not seeing disks, and shows only my ZRAM device: - $ df -h / Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/xvda2 30G 12G 18G 40% /

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2026757] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq on Ubuntu Jammy crashes on neutron-dhcp-agent updates

2025-05-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Assignee: Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) => Lukas Märdian (slyon) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2026757 Title: [SRU

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106017] Re: NetworkManager still adds default ipv6 route despite setting to ignore it

2025-05-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Tags removed: server-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106017 Title: NetworkManager still adds default ipv6 route despite setting t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107402] Re: lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor in 25.04

2025-04-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Added as known issue referring to the bug and mentioning the mitigation => https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/plucky-puffin-release-notes/48687 ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Status: New => Fix Released --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107402] Re: lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor in 25.04

2025-04-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Maxime Bélair (mbelair) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107402 Title: lsblk on IBM z Syste

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107455] Re: segfault of lsblk s390x in containers due to apparmor

2025-04-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Maxime Bélair (mbelair) ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. http

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107455] [NEW] segfault of lsblk s390x in containers due to apparmor

2025-04-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Public bug reported: Hey, while debugging bug 2107402 we found that there is more to fix. Running lsblk in a container on s390x hits this: [12064869.934674] audit: type=1400 audit(1744791155.353:111962): apparmor="DENIED" operation="file_mmap" class="file" namespace="root//lxd-p_" profile="lsblk

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107402] Re: lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor in 25.04

2025-04-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On one hand we see this should block all of it - but installs work. But on the other Maybe this is just for extended attributes of the disk. Let us check that ... Understanding that will help to decide if this sis a stall-the-release or a normal SRU -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107402] Re: lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor in 25.04

2025-04-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
It seems mbelair is already on it => https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1632 Great I do not need to prep a PR for it. I'll reach out to coordinate -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107402] Re: lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor in 25.04

2025-04-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Discussed with Frank, while it is not great, CSS >0 are rare. They are more likely Decision was to add a release note entry as known issue, and drive the fix as SRU. The remaining gap is its usage on the install path, but mainframe users are even more LTS centric. Noble is unaffected, upgrades t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107402] Re: lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor in 25.04

2025-04-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107402 Title: lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107402] Re: lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor in 25.04

2025-04-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Added the two people working on these profiles before as FYI -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107402 Title: lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor in 2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107402] Re: lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor in 25.04

2025-04-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
This is a regression in Plucky, the lsblk profile is new. Compare - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/752337126/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-s390x.apparmor_4.1.0~beta1-0ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/787477386/buildlog_ubuntu-plucky-s390x.apparmor_4.1.0~beta5-0ubuntu14_BUILDING

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099790] Re: [p-m] Mir FTBFS in plucky-proposed

2025-04-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hey, we've been discussing this in the release sprint. While it is a goal to get all buildable, but it is probably too late for this. If it needs an SRU it would need to be fixed as part of that. FYI -8 also was FTBFS https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/2.14.1-8 The request then was to remove

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097800] Re: [MIR] libva

2025-04-05 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Trying to see if all is ready - #1 further drivers First of all thanks Daniel for the answer. But if "please treat it like that - recommended for optimal experience but not something we are allowed to install by default" is the way it needs to be in plucky this way. Sorry that being paten

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2103888] Re: Please remove lomiri and qtmir from plucky-proposed

2025-04-03 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hey, thanks for explaining the background so well - we all have been there at the uncertainty if all will be ready to make a particular switch. We didn't switch to MIR 2.20 as you say and it is too late to try. Hence I'm unsure on mir (at first). It is not that we'd remove an unintended 2.20, w

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097800] Re: [MIR] libva

2025-03-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Actually it had the right state already since the security review. And [1] also disables trace as recommended by security - thanks. So all we are waiting is freeze lift, upload, promote then ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, whic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2101799] Re: initramfs-tools in noble repo misses hooks

2025-03-11 Thread Christian Pelzl
During `sudo apt-get update` && `sudo apt-get upgrade` the command ended with: $ sudo apt-get upgrade ... Processing triggers for linux-image-6.8.0-54-generic (6.8.0-54.56) ... /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools: update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.8.0-54-generic E: /usr/share/init

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2101799] Re: initramfs-tools in noble repo misses hooks

2025-03-11 Thread Christian Pelzl
Well and ... $ sudo reboot now ... leads to a server that is irresponsive to 1) my ssh terminal as well as in 2) the DigitalOcean Droplet Console. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2101799] Re: initramfs-tools in noble repo misses hooks

2025-03-11 Thread Christian Pelzl
And after restoring the server the first error on upgrading again is: $ sudo apt upgrade ... E: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/btrfs failed with return 1. update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-6.8.0-54-generic with 1. run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2101799] Re: initramfs-tools in noble repo misses hooks

2025-03-10 Thread Christian Pelzl
I made the changes and ran it: mhb@ubuntu-s-2vcpu-4gb-fra1-01:~$ sudo update-initramfs -u update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.8.0-52-generic + set -e + PREREQ= + prereqs + echo + exit 0 + set -e + PREREQ= + . /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions + [ -x /bin/btrfs ] + echo DEBUG: b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2101799] [NEW] initramfs-tools in noble repo misses hooks

2025-03-09 Thread Christian Pelzl
Public bug reported: initramfs-tools package in noble repository is defective and does not contain /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks directory. This prevents proper installation and configuration of initramfs-tools. $ lsb_release -rd No LSB modules are available. Description:Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095584] Re: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only test needs update for Python 3.13

2025-03-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
All good now, should migrate in the next run -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095584 Title: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only test needs update for Python 3.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095584] Re: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only test needs update for Python 3.13

2025-03-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Most arches tests worked now, tempfail on amd64 which was requeued ** Changed in: open-iscsi (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095584] Re: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only test needs update for Python 3.13

2025-03-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
All approved and still testing fine (needed a rebas), uploaded to plucky. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095584 Title: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only te

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095584] Re: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only test needs update for Python 3.13

2025-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
It actually works well on infra - \o/ - open-iscsi: plucky/open-iscsi/2.1.10-3ubuntu3~pluckyppa1 [amd64] + ✅ open-iscsi on plucky for amd64 @ 14.02.25 06:12:51 Log️ 🗒️ - open-iscsi: plucky/open-iscsi/2.1.10-3ubuntu3~pluckyppa1 [arm64] + ✅ open-iscsi on plucky for arm64 @ 14.02.25

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095584] Re: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only test needs update for Python 3.13

2025-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Built, queued the tests on infra ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2095584 Title: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only test needs update for Python 3.13 Stat

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095584] Re: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only test needs update for Python 3.13

2025-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Created a PPA with builds based on the interim state, intention is to see how it behvaes if autopkgtest runs on the real infrastructure https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/lp-2095584-open-iscsi-tests -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seede

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095584] Re: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only test needs update for Python 3.13

2025-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
What is it that really breaks it - the late message unable to find kernel in /tmp/autopkgtest.EBaDMb/build.J66/src/debian/tests/plucky.d/disk.img - the obvious apt changed message earlier sed: can't read /etc/apt/sources.list: No such file or directory There is again too much code meant to be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097800] Re: [MIR] libva

2025-02-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
t part of the UI for extra checks - no translation present, but none needed for this case (no end user facing parts) Problems: None ** Changed in: libva (Ubuntu) Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097800] Re: [MIR] libva

2025-02-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Changed in: libva (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libva in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097800 Title: [MIR] libva Sta

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097518] Re: Failed to start Load AppArmor profiles

2025-02-09 Thread Christian Boltz
This looks like one of your profiles doesn't have include which causes the "Found reference to variable etc_ro, but >" messages. Unfortunately the systemctl output is cut off so I can't see which profile it is. Can you please post the output of systemctl status apparmor.service | cat

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095584] Re: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only test needs update for Python 3.13

2025-02-07 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
testlib is from a time several packages tried to establish a shared lib for tets functions. But requirements diverged and so this never came to permanent good use. Due to that in this particular case the broken code is just unused. Which means the fix for the usage of crypt which is failing in th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095584] Re: open-iscsi: ubuntu-only test needs update for Python 3.13

2025-02-07 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Now it is over the syntax errors and similar, but breaks on being unable to handle plucky images. ... unable to find kernel in /tmp/autopkgtest.r8RVcA/build.x7y/src/debian/tests/plucky.d/disk.img setUpClass (__main__.CloudImageTest) ... ERROR =

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2093081] Re: Installing many packages at once lets the nginx service fail to start

2025-01-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
By being out of proposed this does not immediately fail the tests anymore, but there is a risk that the same will hit e.g. O->P or N->R upgrades, worth a look if you can afford it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2093797] Re: aa-teardown fails after loading my custom flags=(kill) profile

2025-01-11 Thread Christian Boltz
Thanks for the report and the patch! I submitted the fix upstream at https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1484 - using a slightly different patch (since there's already a sed call we can extend). I also added a similar fix to aa-remove-unknown. ** Also affects: apparmor Import

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059859] Re: pam_env(sshd:session): deprecated reading of user environment enabled

2025-01-06 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059859 Title: pam_env(sshd:session): deprecated reading of user environment enabled Status in gdm3 package in Ubuntu: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2093081] Re: Installing many packages at once lets the nginx service fail to start

2025-01-06 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Opening a systemd task as that seems not so much an nginx issue, but a symptom in nginx due to systemd. Also I assume once 257-2ubuntu1 is in the plucky images right away this issue will be gone. But I'm not sure about noble/oracular -> plucky upgrades. Asking for a systemd POV look at this plea

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2093081] Re: Installing many packages at once lets the nginx service fail to start

2025-01-06 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Checked further and reduced the set to install to trigger the issue. And that was ... interesting, imagine a long log that I removed, here is what matters: 1. No other software is needed I formerly reduced it just to libvirt+nginx, but that only mattered because its dependencies made it upgrade

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Thanks Simon and Jeremy! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089779 Title: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth Status in boost1.83 package in U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2091361] [NEW] New perl dependency in UCF increases minimal image by >10%

2024-12-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Public bug reported: As far as I found the changelog https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ucf/3.0044 this might be required as all I can find there is: - add missing Depends: procps, ${perl:Depends} So if there is a real dependency it can't just be dropped. But maybe whatever depends on it

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
This fully migrated and works now. Furthermore upstream was great and quick, they have fixes for the crash and the LTO warning in the latest and the 2.30.x branch. Reproducible builds is merged in both as well. That means we can drop that delta (O2 and reproducible builds) on the merge of the nex

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-03 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Uploaded as 2.30.9+dfsg-1ubuntu1 and checking proposed migration in a bit ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089779 Title: Buffer overflow in aut

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-03 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Tried O2 in variants via - export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -O2 - export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,-O2 Tested: - ldflags + cflags = works - cflags = works - ldflags = still crashing Ok, in that case cflags alone is the smallest (and more common) yet working change to add. -- You received t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Interesting build warning libtool: link: ranlib build/.libs/libSDL2_test.a libtool: link: ( cd "build/.libs" && rm -f "libSDL2_test.la" && ln -s "../libSDL2_test.la" "libSDL2_test.la" ) In function 'SDL_memcpy_REAL', inlined from 'SDL_SetCurrentDisplayMode' at /home/ubuntu/SDL/src/video/SDL_

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
I could now, knowing that it is O3+LTO also reproduce it with upstream git :-) I checked the former 2.30.6 which would also behave the same way if LTO and O3 are enabled, so at the end it wasn't the new version of libsdl2 at all. I submitted it to upstream for their awareness. Reproducible build

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
I checked if O3->O2 alone would also fix the issue - it does. Julian had a great suggestion: """ I'd argue disable -O3; but it may also be fruitful to look where it crashes and force -O2 for that function using `attribute((optimize(2))` (re @paelzer: Hi, if LTO+O3 ...) """ Before the debugging

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Second check good, the non-lto build makes it work. buntu@autopkgtest:~$ /usr/games/wesnoth-1.18 -m --controller 1:ai --controller 2:ai --nogui Battle for Wesnoth v1.18.3 x86_64 Started on Mon Dec 2 12:48:04 2024 Data directory: /usr/share/games/wesnoth/1.18 User configuration di

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
As a bonus of debugging this, the reproducible builds have fallen out as well. The patch that I use works (that is what was tested above) and it is stable in its binaries across 10 builds: md5sum 0*/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSDL2-2.0.so.0*.objdump cd47f413db025e99b4d888e84fac4a31 00/usr/lib/x

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
I used it more like a shotgun, but with local attribute((optimize(2)) in the place of the warning and back up the stack of the crash I got still a crash. I'll use it a bit more widely and if working then refine that throughout tomorrow as it is iterating "modify + run (for some time)". If OTOH no

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Just also adding -flto=auto to LDFLAGS (in addition to CFLAGS) did not start to cause the issue on the git build. But I think it is worth trying export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=optimize=-lto in the PPA builds. And indeed the no-LTO build in: https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/lp-208

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-12-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
I was re-verifying some of the major decision points to make sure this goes the right paths (after all this crossed three digits of builds overall) and as my gut feeling told me, something is even more odd. I went back and ended up no more being able to reproduce the good case. Not even with the P

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
New build, this time without debug-symbol and therefore no stripping on build. Results: 10x with "fixed reproducible build (or crap)" patch - 10x fail 10x rebuild "as-is" - 10x fail So I have a single magic build that works in [1] and all others fail :-/ Even 10 of what should be the same. ?What

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
:-/ I accidentally built 20 times repro instead of 10/10 and one had a failing builder (not build) They ALL triggered the crash - at least it seems not flaky. So maybe, it is more the debugsymbol stripping as assumed above. Because in the try to be Let me do a few without, at least it Oddly bu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Attachment added: "bad.buildinfo" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/2089779/+attachment/5841033/+files/bad.buildinfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Attachment added: "good.buildlog" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/2089779/+attachment/5841030/+files/good.buildlog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Attachment added: "bad.buildlog" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/2089779/+attachment/5841031/+files/bad.buildlog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https:/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Attachment added: "good.buildinfo" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/2089779/+attachment/5841032/+files/good.buildinfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. htt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Ok, this loves to stay weird :-/ The rebuild fails as well! Which leaves very little difference left :-/ PPA build yesterday, works https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/2.30.9+dfsg-1build1/+build/29317183 Archive build yesterdday, fails https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/2.30.9+

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Uh wait, the bad build in proposed was against ALL in -proposed (as of 13 days ago). But the PPA build was against plucky as-is. Let me change the PPA dependencies to include proposed and rebuild once more ... (just to make sure nothing still in -proposed is what breaks this and would break the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Uploading libsdl2_2.30.9+dfsg-1build1.dsc Uploading libsdl2_2.30.9+dfsg-1build1.debian.tar.xz Uploading libsdl2_2.30.9+dfsg-1build1_source.buildinfo Uploading libsdl2_2.30.9+dfsg-1build1_source.changes Waiting for build and re-tests ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
The only reasonable thing in there with a function is the lib itself. $ find good good good/usr good/usr/share good/usr/share/doc good/usr/share/doc/libsdl2-2.0-0 good/usr/share/doc/libsdl2-2.0-0/README.md good/usr/share/doc/libsdl2-2.0-0/CREDITS.txt good/usr/share/doc/libsdl2-2.0-0/changelog.gz

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Very interesting - both the 2.30.6 but even the 2.30.9+dfsg-1ubuntu1~pluckyppa1 no change rebuild work. $ sudo apt install libsdl2-2.0-0=2.30.9+dfsg-1ubuntu1~pluckyppa1 .. works So something was wrong when built as https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/2.30.9+dfsg-1 Which was better now t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2026757] Re: dnsmasq on Ubuntu Jammy crashes on neutron-dhcp-agent updates

2024-11-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** No longer affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Lunar) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2026757 Title: dnsmasq on Ubuntu Jammy crashes on neutron-dhcp-agent updates S

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Adding the cflgas from our build to the mix: $ git clean -xfd $ git clean checkout . $ export CFLAGS="-Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
lts (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) ** Changed in: wesnoth (Ubuntu) Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) =&

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Between versions could most likely be packaging, upstream or something in the build env changing. Most changes are in the upstream version, so let me try how https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL.git behaves. This is only what is in libsdl2-2.0-0:amd64 2.30.9+dfsg-1 Not the other s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
The crash itself is, despite debuginfod, not more informative than the following: (gdb) bt #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=, signo=6, no_tid=0) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44 #1 __pthread_kill_internal (threadid=, signo=6) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78 #2 __GI___pthread_kill (threadid=,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
I can recreate this locally, and really the new libsdl2 seems to be the culprint. Fine: $ sudo ~/work/autopkgtest/autopkgtest/runner/autopkgtest --no-built-binaries --apt-upgrade --shell wesnoth-1.18_1.18.3-1.dsc -- qemu --ram-size=8192 --cpus 2 ~/work/autopkgtest-plucky-amd64.img Triggers the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] Re: Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Always passed in oracular https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/w/wesnoth-1.18/oracular/amd64 In Plucky it seems to fail mostly with: libsdl2 | 2.30.9+dfsg-1 (oracular had 2.30.6+dfsg-1) And at the same time still working otherwise https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/w/wesnoth-1.18/plucky

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089779] [NEW] Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

2024-11-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
tance: Undecided Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) Status: Triaged ** Tags: update-excuse ** Tags added: update-excuse ** Also affects: libsdl2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: wesnoth (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2086560] Re: lvm2 missing lvresize_fs_helper

2024-11-21 Thread Dan Christian
The version shipped with 24.04 did not have this problem. So a work around, if you are live booting off USB (as I was), is to use a 24.04 image for this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https:/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2080965] Re: [MIR] architecture-properties

2024-11-19 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Only the source and bin:native-architecture was requested. Promoted these now that all is approved and agreed. Let us see if that allows things to migrate and resolve without further mismatches. Override component to main native-architecture 0.2.3 in plucky amd64: universe/devel/optional/100% ->

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2086560] [NEW] lvm2 missing lvresize_fs_helper

2024-11-03 Thread Dan Christian
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 24.10 running live from USB I'm trying to resize some partitions so I can upgrade (because /boot needs more room) lvresize fails with: /usr/libexec/lvresize_fs_helper: execvp failed: No such file or directory This appears to be that lvm2 bug 124 has not been fixed in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083612] Re: aa-remove-unknown: I/O error for unconfined profiles

2024-10-03 Thread Christian Boltz
Switching back to "new" since the fix still needs to be added to the Ubuntu package. ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. htt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083612] Re: aa-remove-unknown: I/O error for unconfined profiles

2024-10-03 Thread Christian Boltz
This was fixed upstream with https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1240 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083612 Title: aa-remove-unknown: I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2081692] Re: apparmor profile too restrictive : kernel logs spammed with ~/.cache/mesa_shader_cache_db accesses

2024-09-24 Thread Christian Boltz
Fix submitted for AppArmor upstream: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1333 Until the fix arrives in Ubuntu, you can add the additional lines to your /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mesa or (better) create a file /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mesa.d/lp2081692 with the added lines.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078467] Re: aa-enforce /etc/apparmor.d/* - Error

2024-09-04 Thread Christian Boltz
For reference: This was fixed upstream with https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/1218 in April. Until fixed Ubuntu packages are available, you can manually apply the (simple) patch from that merge request. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu T

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2068612] Re: Please remove wireless-tools from oracular

2024-08-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Hey Ravi, thanks for driving this! We see progress on the meta packages \o/. Furthermore I was able to process many but not all of the related removals. Therefore it might be time to re-check, summarize and double down on the few tasks that are left to make it in time for beta freeze? -- You re

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2077413] Re: apparmor unconfined profile blocks signal sending

2024-08-20 Thread Christian Boltz
> comm="apparmor_signal" requested_mask="receive" denied_mask="receive" signal=kill peer="/home/ubuntu/apparmor_signal_test_wrap.sh" So you get a denial for receiving a signal from peer="/home/ubuntu/apparmor_signal_test_wrap.sh" - which is not surprising because that peer has a profile: > "/home

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062138] Re: test-logprof.py from test_utils_testsuite / test_utils_testsuite3 in ubuntu_qrt_apparmor failing on Azure Standard_A2_v2

2024-08-12 Thread Christian Boltz
** Also affects: apparmor Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: apparmor Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2064096] Re: Services fail to start in noble deployed with TPM+FDE

2024-05-01 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Thanks for the great debug work so far already, I think it is "apparmor or kernel" enough that we should add those packages and subscribe a few folks we know dealing with those details - I'd start with jjohansen as he'd be the best to map us to either knowledge or a known case. ** Also affects: ap

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876486] Re: systemd breaks due to old libsecomp libs left on the system

2024-04-29 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Hi Jeremy > I do not understand why bugs like this cannot get fixed even years after > several people have reported the same issue and the repro steps are clear I understand this might seem frustrating, but the TL;DR is: Because it isn't as clear as it might seem Detail: As you see throughout t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056739] Re: apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="virt-aa-helper" name="/etc/gnutls/config"

2024-03-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
ackage in Noble: Won't Fix Status in libvirt source package in Noble: Won't Fix Bug description: Christian summarizes this after the great reports by Martin: gnutls started to ship forceful disables in pkg/import/3.8.1-4ubuntu3 and added more later. Due to that anything link

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056739] Re: apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="virt-aa-helper" name="/etc/gnutls/config"

2024-03-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
le: In Progress Status in chrony source package in Noble: Won't Fix Status in gnutls28 source package in Noble: Won't Fix Status in libvirt source package in Noble: Won't Fix Bug description: Christian summarizes this after the great reports by Martin: gnutls started to sh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056739] Re: apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="virt-aa-helper" name="/etc/gnutls/config"

2024-03-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
apparmor source package in Noble: New Status in chrony source package in Noble: New Status in gnutls28 source package in Noble: New Status in libvirt source package in Noble: New Bug description: Christian summarizes this after the great reports by Martin: gnutls started to ship fo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056739] Re: apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="virt-aa-helper" name="/etc/gnutls/config"

2024-03-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
urce package in Noble: New Status in libvirt source package in Noble: New Bug description: Christian summarizes this after the great reports by Martin: gnutls started to ship forceful disables in pkg/import/3.8.1-4ubuntu3 and added more later. Due to that anything linked against gnutl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056739] Re: apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="virt-aa-helper" name="/etc/gnutls/config"

2024-03-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Description changed: + Christian summarizes this after the great reports by Martin: + + gnutls started to ship forceful disables in pkg/import/3.8.1-4ubuntu3 + and added more later. + + Due to that anything linked against gnutls while being apparmor isolated + now hits similar denials

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by default (per image/use-case/TBD)

2024-02-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
I've added a section to the release notes summing this up and linking back here and to some of the past links. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by default (per image/use-case/TBD)

2024-02-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
FYI: updated ubuntu-meta, now in noble-proposed as version 1.532 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322 Title: Please consider no more having irqbalanc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by default (per image/use-case/TBD)

2024-02-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
FYI: Seed change landed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322 Title: Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by default (per image/use-cas

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by default (per image/use-case/TBD)

2024-02-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Steve was so kind reviewing and approving my proposal. Doing that now is also helpful as it should make sure it still has quite some exposure and thereby chances for people to report issues (vs if we'd land it much later like after beta freeze). Changes will: - change the seeds in regard to irqb

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by default (per image/use-case/TBD)

2024-02-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
While there was sadly neither enough time not enough resources to do all the deep dive analysis that could have been done, we succeeded by reaching out to many more parties and got their input as well. Thank you all! Since Noble feature freeze is coming we need to make a call either way. I propose

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by default (per image/use-case/TBD)

2024-02-19 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Interesting, that is more towards irqbalance than I heard so far. thanks Fabio! So we might end up needing to go like "Generally disabled except this list of places [...] where it stays enabled". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, whic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by default (per image/use-case/TBD)

2024-02-19 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Hey Henry, thanks for chiming in and I agree in general that tech moved on. Myself and others said similar before, thanks for adding more details and voices - that is what such a discussion is about. > they just don't go ping-ponging around between In particular on this aspect, so much has happe

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >