[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104316] Re: 25.04 beta TPMFDE: first boot failure

2025-05-12 Thread dann frazier
fyi, I have now disabled the memory attribute protocol for all *.secboot.fd images in Debian. I've added *.secboot.strictnx.fd images that users can opt-in to, if they know their guest OS is compatible: https://salsa.debian.org/qemu- team/edk2/-/commit/766e4f3cb33136c9411746c417d95283e6300dff I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2102680] Re: Installation of AppArmor on a 6.14 kernel produces error message "Illegal number: yes"

2025-05-12 Thread Claudio da Silva Junior
I change the code to: check_userns() { userns_restricted=$(sysctl -e -n kernel.apparmor_restrict_unprivileged_userns) unconfined_userns=$([ -f /sys/kernel/security/apparmor/features/policy/unconfined_restrictions/userns ] && cat /sys/kernel/security/apparmor/features/policy/unc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2102680] Re: Installation of AppArmor on a 6.14 kernel produces error message "Illegal number: yes"

2025-05-12 Thread Claudio da Silva Junior
This problem is not solved with the change [ "$unconfined_users" = "NO" ] in the last comment. If you look in the code, you see this: check_userns() { userns_restricted=$(sysctl -e -n kernel.apparmor_restrict_unprivileged_userns) unconfined_userns=$([ -f /sys/kernel/security/app

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107402] Re: lsblk on IBM z Systems blocked by apparmor in 25.04

2025-05-12 Thread Frank Heimes
@Ryan, I've added an SRU justification. Would you mind having a look at it, and in case it's ok uploading this SRU to plucky again? ** Description changed: + SRU Justification: + + [ Impact ] + + * lsblk on an s390x system that uses DASD disks shows no output. + + * journactl shows lsblk i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107455] Re: segfault of lsblk s390x in containers due to apparmor

2025-05-12 Thread Frank Heimes
@Ryan, I've added an SRU justification. Would you mind having a look at it, and in case it's ok uploading this SRU to plucky again? ** Description changed: + SRU Justification: + + [ Impact ] + + * lsblk on an s390x system that uses DASD disks shows no output. + + * journactl shows lsblk i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2109979] Re: max size of user coredump is 0x7ffff000

2025-05-12 Thread Alexey Vinogradov
Sure, it should be. We just faced with same problem in our (unrelated) project. For modern 64-bit system that is not very unusual to have files > 2G. And we faced, that writing such file with single write() call is not successful. Reason is - as I said - note in 'man 2 write' about maximum size. W

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990542] Re: initrd starts dhclient on interfaces that are not supposed to get an IP address

2025-05-12 Thread Igel Kun
Other symptoms of this bug are that systems without permanent ethernet connection stall for 5min at boot waiting for aoetools to aoe_discover even though no network cable is in the ethernet port... (See bug #2065106 and bug #2062501) -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106115] Re: Expose IFLA_VXLAN_FAN_MAP version via sysctl/proc

2025-05-12 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-aws/6.14.0-1006.6 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-plucky-linux-aws' to 'verification-done-plucky- linux-aws'. If the pr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106115] Re: Expose IFLA_VXLAN_FAN_MAP version via sysctl/proc

2025-05-12 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-oracle/6.14.0-1006.6 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-plucky-linux-oracle' to 'verification-done- plucky-linux-oracle'.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2110464] Re: Failed update - POSIX 1003.1e capabilities (libcap-dev package)

2025-05-12 Thread Sudhakar Verma
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2110468] Re: hv_sock doesn't work after removing ssh@.service and modifying ssh.socket

2025-05-12 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Description changed: A customer uses hv_sock to connect to their linux vm(hyperv vms). They can connect to 22.04, but can't connect to 24.04 So I researched why, Since Kinetic, we have below commit from Debian I think. https://salsa.debian.org/ssh- team/openssh/-/commit/0dc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2110468] [NEW] hv_sock doesn't work after removing ssh@.service and modifying ssh.socket

2025-05-12 Thread Seyeong Kim
Public bug reported: A customer uses hv_sock to connect to their linux vm(hyperv vms). They can connect to 22.04, but can't connect to 24.04 So I researched why, Since Kinetic, we have below commit from Debian I think. https://salsa.debian.org/ssh- team/openssh/-/commit/0dc73888bbfc17fae04b891a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2102033] Proposed package upload rejected

2025-05-12 Thread Timo Aaltonen
An upload of apparmor to plucky-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "bugs missing sru information, and has changes without an sru bug attached". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107402] Proposed package upload rejected

2025-05-12 Thread Timo Aaltonen
An upload of apparmor to plucky-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "bugs missing sru information, and has changes without an sru bug attached". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107455] Proposed package upload rejected

2025-05-12 Thread Timo Aaltonen
An upload of apparmor to plucky-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "bugs missing sru information, and has changes without an sru bug attached". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107723] Proposed package upload rejected

2025-05-12 Thread Timo Aaltonen
An upload of apparmor to plucky-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "bugs missing sru information, and has changes without an sru bug attached". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107727] Proposed package upload rejected

2025-05-12 Thread Timo Aaltonen
An upload of apparmor to plucky-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "bugs missing sru information, and has changes without an sru bug attached". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2109029] Proposed package upload rejected

2025-05-12 Thread Timo Aaltonen
An upload of apparmor to plucky-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "bugs missing sru information, and has changes without an sru bug attached". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib