[Touch-packages] [Bug 2102680] Re: Installation of AppArmor on a 6.14 kernel produces error message "Illegal number: yes"

I’m also affected by this issue on Ubuntu 24.04, kernel 6.8.0-58-generic (pending upgrade to 6.8.0-59-generic), with AppArmor version 4.0.1really4.0.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.4. I encountered the error /lib/apparmor/apparmor.systemd: 148: [: ILLEGAL NUMBER: YES during AppArmor service startup. The error or

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2107950] Re: tzdata 2025b ICU data update

This bug was fixed in the package tzdata - 2025b-3ubuntu1 --- tzdata (2025b-3ubuntu1) questing; urgency=medium * Merge with Debian unstable. Remaining changes: - Ship 2025a ICU timezone data which are utilized by PHP in tzdata-icu - Add autopkgtest test case for ICU timezone

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2109511] Re: Remove /etc/timezone starting with Ubuntu 25.10 (questing)

This bug was fixed in the package tzdata - 2025b-3ubuntu1 --- tzdata (2025b-3ubuntu1) questing; urgency=medium * Merge with Debian unstable. Remaining changes: - Ship 2025a ICU timezone data which are utilized by PHP in tzdata-icu - Add autopkgtest test case for ICU timezone

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2080499] Re: /usr/share/apport/apport:ProcessLookupError:/usr/share/apport/apport@1248:main:_check_global_pid_and_forward:forward_crash_to_container

https://github.com/canonical/apport/pull/484 got merged. ** Changed in: apport Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076269] Re: invalid base64 encoded gzip data on s390x causes autopkgtest failures

https://github.com/canonical/apport/pull/457 was merged. ** Changed in: apport Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2069041] Re: Changing Port in sshd_config requires calling systemctl daemon-reload

Verification for part 2 of the test plan: root@n:~# apt policy openssh-server openssh-server: Installed: 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.12 Candidate: 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.12 Version table: *** 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.12 100 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.11 500 500 http://archive

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2069041] Re: Changing Port in sshd_config requires calling systemctl daemon-reload

Verification for part 1 of the test plan: root@n:~# apt policy openssh-server openssh-server: Installed: 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.12 Candidate: 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.12 Version table: *** 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.12 100 100 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-proposed/main amd64 Packages 1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1980991] Re: /usr/sbin/on_ac_power incorrectly reporting ac power status

@gordon-lack the battery fixes are not present in the Plucky release since they are still awaiting merger. You can view the MR status here: https://code.launchpad.net/~ghadi-rahme/ubuntu/+source/powermgmt-base/+git/powermgmt-base/+merge/482635 I recommend applying the patch from this MR to on_ac

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083020] Re: Backport packages for 24.04.2 HWE stack

Apparently, this just hit ports.ubuntu.com for the armhf platform. I'd consider this SRU to be close to a regression. It adds 140 MB in my case on a headless machine through the dependency on libllvm19. And what is the reason? HWE?! I'm not getting it and I'm not buying it. -- You received t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2110287] [NEW] ubuntu-bug reports third party installs but not which ones

Public bug reported: Looks like this has been an issue since Trusty. I'm happy to accept that maybe a third party app or library has been installed that seems to prevent ubuntu-bug from reporting an error, but it would be really, really, really helpful if ubuntu-bug would give us a hint as to whic