[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106437] Re: monitors never dpms off when three present

2025-04-07 Thread Daniel van Vugt
This is related to events coming from one or more monitors, which the system might treat as a reason to wake up. Sometimes a monitor will add/remove audio support, or disconnect entirely, when going to sleep. And that can give the OS the impression that something important is happening which should

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2067897] Re: strongswan fails to configure DNS via systemd-resolved (resolvconf: Failed to set DNS configuration: Link lo is loopback device)

2025-04-07 Thread Ramone Burrell
Thank you, Nick. Your comments helped me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067897 Title: strongswan fails to configure DNS via systemd-resolved (resolvconf:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106417] Re: the screen jumps

2025-04-07 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => mate-desktop (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106437] [NEW] monitors never dpms off when three present

2025-04-07 Thread Mark Smith
Public bug reported: DPMS off worked fine when I only had two monitors. I recently added a third monitor to my setup. When locking the screen or timing out, the monitor turns off as expected via DPMS, but then it wakes up within seconds. They go back and forth blinking on and off for a while and t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2096824] Re: apport_excepthook called with incorrect number of arguments

2025-04-07 Thread Nick Rosbrook
This needs more work for jammy->noble upgrades. After fixing the call to apport_excepthook, importing apport fails with the following message in /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log: ERROR: failed to import apport python module, can't generate crash: No module named 'pickle' This apparently has to do w

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095370] Re: AppArmor early policy load not funcitoning

2025-04-07 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-azure- nvidia/6.8.0-1014.15 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-noble-linux-azure-nvidia' to 'verification-done-noble-linux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106264] Re: Update glib2.0 to 2.84.1

2025-04-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package glib2.0 - 2.84.1-1 --- glib2.0 (2.84.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream bugfix release (LP: #2106264) * Remove patches applied in new release -- Jeremy Bícha Fri, 04 Apr 2025 15:01:37 -0400 ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Sta

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106247] Re: xorg: FTBFS after Rules-Requires-Root default change in dpkg-dev

2025-04-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thanks ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106247 Title: xorg: FTBFS after Rules-Require

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2102033] Re: remmina blocked by apparmor in Plucky

2025-04-07 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Disregard. May have been a transient error, worked after purge and reinstall for some reason. ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956102] Re: Time for the US is shown in 24h format. It should be 12h with AM/PM

2025-04-07 Thread won't fix
GTk3 and GTK4 added. File chooser dialogs are not set on timezone setup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gsettings-desktop-schemas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956102 Title: Time for the US is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2092232] Re: unable to deploy Plucky Puffin due to AppArmor lsblk denials

2025-04-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package apparmor - 4.1.0~beta5-0ubuntu13 --- apparmor (4.1.0~beta5-0ubuntu13) plucky; urgency=medium * Rename and edit patch to fix lsblk denials on networked file systems (LP: #2092232): - d/p/u/lsblk_hyper_v_fixup.patch -> d/p/u/lsblk_networ

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106177] Re: aa-notify's default configuration breaks the userns restriction by suggesting capabilities addition to unprivileged_userns

2025-04-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package apparmor - 4.1.0~beta5-0ubuntu13 --- apparmor (4.1.0~beta5-0ubuntu13) plucky; urgency=medium * Rename and edit patch to fix lsblk denials on networked file systems (LP: #2092232): - d/p/u/lsblk_hyper_v_fixup.patch -> d/p/u/lsblk_networ

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106417] [NEW] the screen jumps

2025-04-07 Thread tomas alejandro salas
Public bug reported: Everything pops up, I can't turn it off unless I press control+alt+del to turn it off, when I want to maximize the window it also pops up, when I don't want it to pop up, I have to press F11 The version is: 22.04.5 LTS ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: xor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2102033] Re: remmina blocked by apparmor in Plucky

2025-04-07 Thread Ryan Lee
Can you please share 1) the version of the AppArmor package you now have installed, 2) the contents of /etc/apparmor.d/remmina, and 3) the AppArmor denial log from the syslog (which should have something like "dbus-daemon[3722]: apparmor="DENIED""? -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2102033] Re: remmina blocked by apparmor in Plucky

2025-04-07 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Sadly, this fix did not work. Remmina still fails with the same issue. ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106404] Re: poppler April 2025 security fixes

2025-04-07 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Description changed: I'm preparing an upload for plucky to fix 2 new CVEs. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-32364 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-32365 + + I don't have spare capacity to work on this for any other Ubuntu series. + + My packagi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106404] Re: poppler April 2025 security fixes

2025-04-07 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Tags added: plucky -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106404 Title: poppler April 2025 security fixes Status in poppler package in Ubuntu: In Progress

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106404] [NEW] poppler April 2025 security fixes

2025-04-07 Thread Jeremy Bícha
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: I'm preparing an upload for plucky to fix 2 new CVEs. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-32364 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-32365 ** Affects: poppler (Ubuntu) Importance: Un

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2105395] Re: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: fewer upgrades counted as worse

2025-04-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 3.0.0 --- apt (3.0.0) unstable; urgency=medium [ Julian Andres Klode ] * And so it begins: Bump the version to 3.0 to mark the start of a stable series, dedicated to Steve Langasek. * symbols: Update to 2.9.35 * solver3: Consider mor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106390] [NEW] g++-15 package should depend on newer binutils (2.44)

2025-04-07 Thread Igor Machado
Public bug reported: I was testing g++-15 on my Ubuntu 24.04, using plucky (25.04) repo. Then g++-15 works fine on general with binutils 2.42 (from Ubuntu 24.04), but in some situation (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119657) it explicitly required binutils 2.44 with .base64 opcode

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2105395] Re: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: fewer upgrades counted as worse

2025-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2105395 Title: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse resu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097820] Re: Additional Drivers tab on software-properties-qt does not populate

2025-04-07 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hello, what's the ETA looking like for landing this in the archive? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097820 Title: Additional Drivers tab on sof

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2085520] Re: Sennheiser Momentum 3 loses sound from time to time

2025-04-07 Thread Bartosz Woronicz
This seesm to be caused by other device like phone owning the output and the implementation by Sennheiser is particually deficient in some what If I list all UUIDs the proper output seems to be there [MOMENTUM 3]# info 00:1B:66:E9:99:8F Device 00:1B:66:E9:99:8F (public) Name: MOMENTUM 3

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104316] Re: 25.04 beta TPMFDE: first boot failure

2025-04-07 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** Changed in: edk2 (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-25.04 ** Changed in: ubuntu Milestone: ubuntu-25.04 => None ** No longer affects: ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2093324] Re: Re-enable dLeyna grilo plugin

2025-04-07 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thanks @smb for providing a debdiff to fix this! After my statement from above (comment #11) and the updated SRU template, this LGTM! We currently have the same version of grilo-plugins in Noble & Oracular, so your patch applies to both, but we need to adopt the version string accordingly to prov

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2087769] Re: cp: preserving permissions for ' ': Operation not supported in Noble NFS

2025-04-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2093324] Re: Re-enable dLeyna grilo plugin

2025-04-07 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thanks for providing additional context. I can confirm that the new "Recommends: dleyna-server" is what we have in Plucky today and what we have in Jammy. This is OK as the "grilo- plugins-0.3-extra" binary is indeed split-off and in "universe" (despite src:grilo-plugins being in "main"). So does

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698270] Re: Totem pauses and stutters during video playback even when CPU usage is low

2025-04-07 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: totem Status: Unknown => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698270 Title: Totem pauses and stutters during video playback e

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099966] Re: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 fails to upgrade

2025-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
# Problem statement The problem here is that * Installed gnome-settings-daemon Depends: libcannbera-gtk3-0 * Installed libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 (= 0.30-10ubuntu10) Provides: libcanberra-gtk3-0 * Upgrade libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 (= 0.30-17ubuntu2) Depends: libcanberra-gtk3-0 i.e. we renamed libc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104316] Re: 25.04 beta TPMFDE: first boot failure

2025-04-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package edk2 - 2025.02-3ubuntu2 --- edk2 (2025.02-3ubuntu2) plucky; urgency=medium * Uninstall memory attribute protocol in all images, workaround for (LP: #2104316) -- Mate Kukri Fri, 04 Apr 2025 18:44:53 +0100 ** Changed in: edk2 (Ubuntu) Stat

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106371] Re: 32:9 resolution missing

2025-04-07 Thread Daniel van Vugt
This probably is not a software bug... https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/the-display-bug-we-cant-fix/57434 ** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106371] [NEW] 32:9 resolution missing

2025-04-07 Thread Lucas Garcia
Public bug reported: From time to time, my screen monitor resolution disappears and I end up with a very bugy display (flicking) or forced to use a completely flatten 16:9 one on my ultra wide monitor (samsung odyssey G9) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu3

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106340] Re: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result

2025-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2105395 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2105395 Same issue as 2105395 --- tmp/AptSolverDump-2106340.system.txt2025-04-07 09:00:54.944631938 +0200 +++ tmp/AptSolverDump-2106340.git.txt 2025-04-07 09:00:56.858634719 +0200 @@ -1,10 +1,6 @@ Upgra

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099966] Re: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 fails to upgrade

2025-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https:/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099966] Re: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 fails to upgrade

2025-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Actually it wasn't, this dump simply is too old and affected by other bugs in the dumper. It seems this was the result of an `apt upgrade` but the old version did not differentiate and rendr it the same as an `apt- get upgrade`, in turn forbidding packages from being installed. In any case I can

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 2106340] Re: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result

2025-04-07 Thread David Costello
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2105395 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2105395 Good morning , Thank you Julian . Kind Regards David Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 8:10, Julian Andres Klode<2106...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: *** This bug is a duplic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099966] Re: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 fails to upgrade

2025-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This has been fixed already over the last month. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099966 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099966] Re: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 fails to upgrade

2025-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Summary changed: - Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result + Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 fails to upgrade -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2105708] Re: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result

2025-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2105395 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2105395 Evaluation shows this is the same issue as 2105395, notably, we install fewer upgrades and it is counted as a worse result --- tmp/AptSolverDump-2105708.system.txt2025-04-07 08:59:01.606467236

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2105395] Re: Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: fewer upgrades counted as worse

2025-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Summary changed: - Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result + Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: fewer upgrades counted as worse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://