I went through this - as my first thought this looks perfectly
plausible. I'll try to repro this and create a PoC for the usecase
mentioned here.
I'll additionally like people from bug #2019026 to weigh in as well
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch see
** Changed in: xkeyboard-config
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xkeyboard-config in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327963
Title:
Error activating XKB configuration
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted packagekit (1.2.5-2ubuntu3) for jammy
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
aptdaemon/1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu39 (amd64, s390x)
software-properties/0.99.22.9 (amd64, arm64, s390x)
Please visit t
Hello Timo,
Yes, I confirmed this bug is gone. The proposed bash version 5.2.32-1ubuntu1.1
works well.
# dpkg -l bash
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted packagekit (1.2.8-2ubuntu1) for noble
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/0.99.49.1 (i386)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
pro
** Also affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux-hwe-6.8 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-dri
Public bug reported:
Was doing upgrade to 22.04.5
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: polkitd 0.105-33
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-200.220-generic 5.4.284
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-200-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.6
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted packagekit (1.3.0-1ubuntu1) for
oracular have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/0.102 (arm64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
pro
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted packagekit (1.3.0-1ubuntu1) for
oracular have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/0.102 (arm64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
pro
>>> Question to the reporter: does systemd-ac-power work correctly in
the system you have where unpatched on_ac_power is incorrect?
Yes. See #7, where I suggested this (once the systemd version was
fixed).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pack
This is all very confusing. And making a mistake here can have
drastic consequences, as was mentioned: unattended-upgrades can stop
applying security updates.
I wonder if we wouldn't be in a better shape if we switched unattended-
upgrades to use systemd-ac-power. That seems to be at least mai
Hello Alfonso, or anyone else affected,
Accepted shadow into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu3.3 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
Hello Alex, or anyone else affected,
Accepted pam into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/1.4.0-11ubuntu2.5
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubun
Hello Alessandro, or anyone else affected,
Accepted packagekit into oracular-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/1.3.0-1ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. S
Hello Alessandro, or anyone else affected,
Accepted packagekit into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/1.2.5-2ubuntu3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Alessandro, or anyone else affected,
Accepted packagekit into oracular-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/1.3.0-1ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. S
Hello Alessandro, or anyone else affected,
Accepted packagekit into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/1.2.8-2ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Sitsofe, or anyone else affected,
Accepted bluez into oracular-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/5.77-0ubuntu2 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wik
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083131
Accepted bash into oracular-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/5.2.32-1ubuntu1.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please
Hello Philip, or anyone else affected,
Accepted policykit-1 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-1/124-2ubuntu1.24.04.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Philip, or anyone else affected,
Accepted policykit-1 into oracular-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-1/124-2ubuntu1.24.10.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package
Hello Steven, or anyone else affected,
Accepted bash into oracular-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/5.2.32-1ubuntu1.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Hi,
just some Warnings:
sudo netplan generate
** (generate:300704): WARNING **: 17:18:01.771: nm-device:
NM-2a2a93e2-e395-4291-8c71-b4c90d5b8211: the renderer for nm-devices
must be NetworkManager, it will be used instead of the defined one.
** (generate:300704): WARNING **: 17:18:01.771: nm-dev
Public bug reported:
iputils-ping 3:20240905-1 removed the setcap from the binary, under the
assumption that you don't need special privileges to open ICMP sockets
(as introduced in 2011 in the kernel). However, that only is true if you
have "net.ipv4.ping_group_range = 0 2147483647" (or similar
New build, this time without debug-symbol and therefore no stripping on
build.
Results:
10x with "fixed reproducible build (or crap)" patch - 10x fail
10x rebuild "as-is" - 10x fail
So I have a single magic build that works in [1] and all others fail :-/
Even 10 of what should be the same.
?What
I have instead installed 20.04 on a usb stick, am using that for now.
If you require more info please let me know.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089612
Further testing the Daily ISO
This behavior is only shown in a VM or in my case a KVM.
A Bare Metal install is good to go.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089
Hi,
If you run 'sudo netplan generate' in your terminal, do you see any
errors?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089930
Title:
NetworManager crashe
Public bug reported:
When trying to connect with forticlient to an SSL-VPN, the connection will fail
with "Config DNS failed"
Then i was searching in logs of forticlient and found:
20241127 07:07:55.291 TZ=+0100 [sslvpn:EROR] nmtools:255 Command to set
ipv4.ignore-auto-routes returned with stat
https://github.com/canonical/apport/pull/406 merged
** Changed in: apport
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089387
** Description changed:
tracking bug
Ubuntu plucky: 1:4.15.3-3ubuntu2
Debian unstable: 1:4.16.0-5
+ ### New Debian Changes ###
+
+ shadow (1:4.16.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Chris Hofstaedtler ]
+ * Always build with btrfs support on linux-any (Closes: #856557)
+ * debp
Public bug reported:
tracking bug
Ubuntu plucky: 1:4.15.3-3ubuntu2
Debian unstable: 1:4.16.0-5
I'll see about tackling bug 2049529 along the way.
** Affects: shadow (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Skia (hyask)
Status: In Progress
** Tags: needs-merge
** Changed in
:-/ I accidentally built 20 times repro instead of 10/10 and one had a
failing builder (not build)
They ALL triggered the crash - at least it seems not flaky.
So maybe, it is more the debugsymbol stripping as assumed above.
Because in the try to be
Let me do a few without, at least it
Oddly bu
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+git/openssl/+merge/476331
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073991
Tit
I guess that splunk is shipping its own libraries somewhere in
/opt/splunk but somehow they're not being used. I'm not familiar with
splunk at all and I don't know how they integrate with the system:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH, some other ld.so config, or maybe there's a special
environment to run? I can only
--- Comment From eduard.ste...@ibm.com 2024-11-29 03:32 EDT---
Hi,
so i have a patch for gzip that will fix the problem. Unfortunately my
Copyright Assignment is still processed by the FSF. Until then i cannot
send patches in. Ilja and I will figure out a way to make the patch
available.
** Attachment added: "bad.buildinfo"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/2089779/+attachment/5841033/+files/bad.buildinfo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
https
** Attachment added: "good.buildlog"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/2089779/+attachment/5841030/+files/good.buildlog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
https
** Attachment added: "bad.buildlog"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/2089779/+attachment/5841031/+files/bad.buildlog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
https:/
** Attachment added: "good.buildinfo"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/2089779/+attachment/5841032/+files/good.buildinfo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
htt
Ok, this loves to stay weird :-/ The rebuild fails as well!
Which leaves very little difference left :-/
PPA build yesterday, works
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/2.30.9+dfsg-1build1/+build/29317183
Archive build yesterdday, fails
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/2.30.9+
41 matches
Mail list logo
