Thanks for this explanation, Seth. Very good to know--from a security
perspective. A bit less satisfying from a functionality perspective,
particularly given the assurance by Matt from the OpenSSL team above.
I do understand though that you're aiming for "bug completeness" to
support those that re
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted distro-info (1.1ubuntu0.1) for jammy
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 (amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x)
livecd-rootfs/2.765.20 (amd64)
vagrant-mutate/1.2.0-4.
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted python-debian (0.1.46ubuntu1) for
kinetic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
devscripts/2.22.2ubuntu3 (amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted python-debian (0.1.43ubuntu1.1) for
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 (amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted python-debian (0.1.36ubuntu1.1) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
reprotest/0.7.14 (ppc64el)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
proceedin
Michael, Ubuntu backports specific fixes as they are identified; you can
check the status of our OpenSSL packages on our website:
All OpenSSL issues:
https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?q=&package=openssl&priority=&version=&status=
OpenSSL issues, restricted to just Jammy:
https://ubuntu.com/secur
Just for better bug tracking, I've added some links.
Related bugs (maybe duplicated):
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2013255
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1892747
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1895486
-
https://askubuntu
Hello dm, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cups into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/2.4.1op1-1ubuntu4.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
FiileDevice Yes
This is a typo for "FileDevice", correct?
** Description changed:
After upgrading from 20.04 LTS to 22.04 LTS I can't print colored PDF
document. The print appears always b/w regardless color printing was
enabled or not. Printing from LibreOffice produces a color print. Th
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted initramfs-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.140ubuntu13.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pack
As the xkeyboard-config is not the cause of that bug, the Scroll Lock
key must return because many users use this key in some apps.
I've opened a Merge Request to return the Scroll Lock key:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xkeyboard-config/xkeyboard-config/-/merge_requests/555
** Changed in: xkeyb
Hello wieczyk, or anyone else affected,
Accepted distro-info into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distro-
info/1.1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
Hello wieczyk, or anyone else affected,
Accepted python-debian into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-
debian/0.1.36ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello wieczyk, or anyone else affected,
Accepted python-debian into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-
debian/0.1.43ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello wieczyk, or anyone else affected,
Accepted python-debian into kinetic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-
debian/0.1.46ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/23.0.4-0ubuntu1~23.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
Thanks. There are some smaller points to address. Among other things:
* "extrausers support for adduser" adds "--encrypt-home" to the --help
output. That should be in the other commit.
Let us discuss/address that on Monday together.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
The evince upload to jammy still does:
+Recommends: default-dbus-session-bus | dbus-session-bus,
+ apparmor (>= 3.0.4-2ubuntu2.3),
with the explanation that:
+- debian/control.in: recommend apparmor version that includes the
+ snap_browsers abstraction, or else policy loads wi
An upload of evince to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "adds Recommends that shouldn't be
needed".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bu
Hello Olivier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apparmor into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/3.0.4-2ubuntu2.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https
Hello Olivier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted evince into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/44.1-1ubuntu0.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
I see that there is an apparmor upload for this bug in the lunar queue,
in addition to the evince upload. The apparmor upload adds a line to
abstractions/snap_browsers. This bug report does not explain that the
abstractions/snap_browsers was previously inadequate or that it should
be updated to f
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Reviewing your dmesg attachment in this bug report it
seems that there is a problem with your hardware. I recommend
performing a back up and then investigating the situation. Measures you
might take include check
bdrung: thanks for your review! I addressed your requests accordingly:
* Fixed ubuntu/devel rebase on correct commit
* Fixed doc/adduser.8 rebase (on both the merge and the encrypt home MR)
* Yes, I added the test case to make our testing more robust and referenced the
MR in d/changelog
* Fixed t
** Patch removed: "debdiff between debian adduser 1.134 and 1.134ubuntu1"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adduser/+bug/2021498/+attachment/5679707/+files/debian_adduser_3.134.debdiff
** Patch removed: "debdiff between ubuntu adduser 1.129ubuntu1 and 1.134ubuntu1"
https://bugs.lau
Hi again,
I'm working on a set of DEP-8 tests to check the matching domain
functionality modified by this change that fixes the issue to make a
stronger SRU submission. Also, I could cover bug LP#1677827.
I found a DEP8 proposal on Debian at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024252
Title:
package linux-image-5.19.0-45-generic 5.19.0-45.46~22.04.1 fail
Public bug reported:
Unknown error occurred during auto-upgrade.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: linux-image-5.19.0-45-generic 5.19.0-45.46~22.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-43.44~22.04.1-generic 5.19.17
Uname: Linux 5.19.0-43-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20
** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023151/+attachment/5680268/+files/Stacktrace.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023151/+attachment/5680269/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt
** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023151/+attachment/5678321/+files/CoreDump.gz
** Changed in: evolution-data-server (Ubu
StacktraceTop:
g_settings_set_property (object=0x557a8ce8b390, prop_id=,
value=, pspec=) at ../../../gio/gsettings.c:596
object_set_property (object=object@entry=0x557a8ce8b390, pspec=0x557a8ce8b130,
value=0x7ffe7f2f5130, nqueue=nqueue@entry=0x0, user_specified=)
at ../../../gobject/gobject.c:
StacktraceTop:
g_settings_set_property (object=0x557a8ce8b390, prop_id=,
value=, pspec=) at ../../../gio/gsettings.c:591
object_set_property (object=object@entry=0x557a8ce8b390, pspec=0x557a8ce8b130,
value=0x7ffe7f2f5130, nqueue=nqueue@entry=0x0, user_specified=)
at ../../../gobject/gobject.c:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2021884 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2021884
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #2021884, so is being marked as such.
Nowadays, btrfs snapshots can only be taken by the owner of the source
subvol. https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ch-mount-
options.html#btrfs-specific-mount-options:
> Historically, any user could create a snapshot even if he was not
owner of the source subvolume, the subvolume deletion has b
We encourage you to trust us and take advantage of our services. Choose
the massage course that suits your needs and contact us via phone or
text message. https://lovelymsg.info/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023016
Title:
Merge 13.2-1 into mantic
Status in gdb p
The Merge was more complicated that anticipated, but I finally managed to merge
it.
I locally built it and did some trivial testing. Everything seems fine.
The Merge can be downloaded here:
https://launchpad.net/~dviererbe/+archive/ubuntu/lp2023016-gdb-merge-mantic
--
You received this bug noti
Linking with your .so files still doesn't give me any difference between
gold-2.39 and gold mainline. I'm using my crt*.o, libc_nonshared.a,
libgcc.a. From ld -t output it seems nothing from libc_nonshared.a or
libgcc.a is extracted, so the only real difference ought to be crt1.o,
crti.o, crtn.o,
** Changed in: gnome-control-center
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024135
Title:
Default right click method
ip=off helps, thanks.
If initramfs-tools doesn't do bridges and this is the result, then
that's a bug. Although I admit it's probably quite an uncommon setup :-/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools
No, aoetools is not at fault here. The initrd does not take your netplan
configuration into account. You could specify the ip= kernel parameter
to let the initrd setup your network as you want it, but initramfs-tools
does not have any support for brigdes as far as I know.
If you do not need/use ao
i faced the same issue and here is a workaround to it
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949340
Title:
[upstream] Saving downloads or pages is difficult becau
i faced the same issue and here is a workaround to it
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1366735/how-to-make-chrome-browser-save-
as-dialog-to-be-on-focus-when-opening-under-ub
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+
i faced the same issue and here is a workaround to it
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1366735/how-to-make-chrome-browser-save-
as-dialog-to-be-on-focus-when-opening-under-ub
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+
I just checked it on Ubuntu 23.04:
```
shellcheck -e SC2086,SC2154 -s dash /sbin/dhclient-script
grep shopt /sbin/dhclient-script
```
This does not complain about any bashism. So I am marking the bug as
fixed.
** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You rec
Maybe the bug now should be filed against aoetools? That's in universe,
so maybe it should even be closed as "invalid"?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
It's not any cmdline options. (/proc/cmdline has root=[rootdev] ro)
But I searched on because I couldn't reproduce this bug on a virtual
machine. While on the host system that bugged me, a change in
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions to not start dhclient (but
echo it instead to a file s
Public bug reported:
ISC has announced the end of life for ISC DHCP as of the end of 2022.
Kea is the recommended successor of the DHCP server (isc-dhcp-server).
This bug report is about replacing the DHCP client (isc-dhcp-client).
Ubuntu uses NetworkManager on the desktop and systemd-networkd on
Ubuntu has 4.4.3-P1-2ubuntu2 and therefore is in sync with Debian.
We are working on replacing dhclient with dhcpcd from dhcpcd-base. I am
in the process of replacing it in initramfs-tools and there are subtle
differences which needs more changes than just a command replacement. I
created bug #202
(In reply to Alexander Browne from comment #7)
> > in gtk, kinetic scrolling stops after you put a finger on the touchpad
> > (zwp_pointer_gesture_hold_v1 event), but in firefox it doesn't, you have to
> > wait
>
> In GTK 4, and Firefox uses GTK 3. So either someone need to add it to GTK 3
> or
> in gtk, kinetic scrolling stops after you put a finger on the touchpad
(zwp_pointer_gesture_hold_v1 event), but in firefox it doesn't, you have
to wait
In GTK 4, and Firefox uses GTK 3. So either someone need to add it to
GTK 3 or Firefox needs to use to GTK 4.
--
You received this bug notific
> kept scrolling too long after releasing
this is probably another thing
in gtk, kinetic scrolling stops after you put a finger on the touchpad
(zwp_pointer_gesture_hold_v1 event), but in firefox it doesn't, you have to wait
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
I did also like fast speed, but it should be in line with regular GTK
apps and shouldn't shock new users by feeling 5x faster that them…
> Would you like to write a patch?
I don't currently have a dev setup sooo no..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Heh, I'm used to the faster speed now and the pref changes in the
previous comment feel quite slow :) But that's probably just familiarity
bias rather than the current defaults being objectively better.
So, yes, I'm open to changing the defaults. Maybe we can start with just
flipping `delta_mode`
Hi, the person who originally implemented the scrolling with the wrong
mode only here :)
It's been a year since the original discussions and looks like everyone
has forgotten about it, oops :/
Was just talking with a friend who was trying Linux out and complained
about this:
> [scrolling] was ju
Public bug reported:
can't install samba to share my work folders locally
it says:
Package operation failed
The installation or removal of a software package failed.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: libcap2:amd64 1:2.44-1ubuntu0.22.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcap2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024154
Title:
package libcap2:amd64 1:2.44-1ubuntu0.22.04.1 failed to
install/upgra
Public bug reported:
RaspberryPI image Berryboot Ubuntu latest version
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04
Package: initramfs-tools 0.142ubuntu2
Uname: Linux 5.10.43v64 aarch64
ApportVersion: 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: arm64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
Date: Fri Jun 16 10:12:05
Hi Lucas, thanks for the assistance.
Here's the .debdiff without the ~ppa2 suffix. I opted to go with ubuntu2
because it's not really a security fix, so I wasn't sure if it's really
appropriate to add the security .1 suffix.
The .debdiff is valid for both lunar and mantic, as mantic is still
usin
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+git/dnsmasq/+merge/442007
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677827
60 matches
Mail list logo
