** Tags added: 9350 artful
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654448
Title:
XPS 13 9360 and 9350, Realtek ALC3246, Headphone audio hiss
Status in Dell Spu
@kaihengfeng: Sorry, that kernel did not improve the situation. The bug
persists and the same workaround is required. I tested it on a fresh
artful installation (9350 model).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pul
oem-priority needs to the SRU for xenial.
happyaron has finished the major work on
https://launchpad.net/~happyaron/+archive/ubuntu/nm-oem/+packages.
Please help to finish the remaining SRU process.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, w
Public bug reported:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/click", line 37, in
import click
ImportError: No module named 'click'
dpkg: avertissement: le sous-processus ancien script pre-removal a retourné une
erreur de sortie d'état 1
dpkg: tentative d'exécution du script du n
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691991
Title:
Xorg Segmentation fault on Hisilicon D05 board (arm64
** Also affects: oem-priority/xenial
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: oem-priority/xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to modemmanager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Yes, you can close this bug now. Thank you very much for your good works
and to fix this problems.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691991
Title:
Xorg Segmenta
[Expired for bluez (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Please try this: http://people.canonical.com/~khfeng/lp1654448-artful/
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
Public bug reported:
error of instalation after try to install teamviewer 12
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: liblzma5:i386 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-54.57~16.04.1-generic 4.8.17
Uname: Linux 4.8.0-54-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModul
** Also affects: humanity-icon-theme (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: gnome-17.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to humanity-icon-theme in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-datetime i
** Changed in: glib
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
** Changed in: glib
Importance: Unknown => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691908
Title:
fs
Public bug reported:
Tests fail with Python 3.6:
==
FAIL:
autopilot.tests.unit.test_application_launcher.ApplicationLauncherInternalTests.test_get_application_launcher_wrapper_raises_runtimeerror
** Description changed:
- Steve brought up bug 1691983 and how it's duplicate signature is missing
- information. It contains:
+ [Impact]
+ apport is creating a shorter than necessary duplicate signature in
apport-package bug reports which can lead to misconsolidation and confused
developers.
+
Public bug reported:
I am not sure that the issue is a bug.
I was trying to install screen by the command prompt when i got the error
message.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: bsdutils 1:2.29-1ubuntu2 [modified: usr/bin/logger usr/bin/renice
usr/bin/script usr/bin/scrip
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
Cruz, thanks for this.
However, (1) after all the trouble I had getting OpenVPN working, I
don't fancy switching to something else (and my system does work at
present, using the older version of Network Manager).
Also, (2) I don't really understand what you say about /etc/hosts,
though probably I
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
Hello; would those of you affected by this bug please attach your
/var/log/apt/term.log file?
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
Title:
package
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981
package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade:
package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before
** Changed in: ntp (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582767
Title:
apparmor permissions missing for winbind
Status i
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698958
Title:
package click 0.4.45.1+16.10.20160916-0ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrad
Public bug reported:
I am unable to update Ubuntu through Software Updater, so I tried to
update it manually. I am using the LXDE environment, in order to save
RAM, as it is lighter than Gnome.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: click 0.4.45.1+16.10.20160916-0ubuntu1
ProcV
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
Seeing the same thing with OCFS2 on Oracle VM Server 3.3.3. Clustered
OCFS2, but on one device and only one node (Clustered when setup,
but then the cluster portion wasn't utilized due to licensing)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded package
Also affects ALC3234 on Dell Latitude 3340
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1670059
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1583801
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/artful/apport/ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692127
Title:
duplicate signature for Package problems can
> What Ubuntu release are you using?
This is reproducible on 16.04, 17.04 & 17.10
For 16.04 there was a patch which fixes the issue for me
(https://launchpadlibrarian.net/206123315/upcoming-after-end.patch) but
since then indicator-datetime code changed significantly and the patch
is not valid an
What Ubuntu release are you using?
What is the output of 'locale' specifically LC_TIME ?
Does the event show correctly in gnome-calendar and in evolution?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-datetime in
** Description changed:
Indicator-datetime lists events to take place one day ahead e.g. all day
event on Monday is listed to be happen on Sunday
Also this scenario also happens for today's date. Foe example;
1. Create a full-day-event in any previous day (2nd june 2017)
2. Click 2
The bug occurs for any event when DTSTART == DTEND
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-datetime in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302004
Title:
Indicator-datetime doesn't list in-progress eve
** Description changed:
Indicator-datetime lists events to take place one day ahead e.g. all day
event on Monday is listed to be happen on Sunday
-
Also this scenario also happens for today's date. Foe example;
1. Create a full-day-event in any previous day (2nd june 2017)
2. Clic
Submitted patch upstream, will revisit in a couple weeks before taking
on an extra deviation in Ubuntu (since currently we do not have any
delta).
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Assignee: David Britton (davidpbritton) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Assignee: David Brit
For me, installing libcanberra-pulse worked.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-sounds in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736349
Title:
"Test speakers" is silent
Status in OEM Priority Project:
** Also affects: dnsmasq (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774970
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
I gave up and spent $80 on new headphones that seem to work. GhostTek
SoDrop2s, if anyone wants to know. Working for me on 17.04 Zesty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
This is not a bug but the expected behavior.
Due to the use of a pipe, "readarray blah" is executed in a sub-shell.
But "echo ${blah[@]}" is executed in the parent shell. This has nothing
to do with readarray, the command ": | blah=blah; echo $blah" would also
fail to output blah.
On the other ha
Affects xenial too. There is definitely something wrong.
Several notes on this:
1. A direct call to "echo ${f[@]:0:1}" outputs "a". The problems thus
lies in the variable assignment.
2. If first_char=${f[@]:0:1}, then echo "$first_char" outputs \001 but
"declare -p first_char" outputs \001\001
More than a year and this bug is not yet fixed?
Is it a huge problem to solve?
Can I help with some log files or something like that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1533343 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533343
Very same issue on an Asus E202SA.
After watching a movie pulseaudio stoped working at the next reboot. Now
I must use ALSA, but cannot use headphones o connect to HDI and listen
only with the netbook's sou
This is not a bug, although some might disagree with the current
behavior of bash.
With a command like 'yes | grep -q .', because the grep terminates early
and the yes is writing past the end of the pipe buffer, the yes process
is _always_ terminated with a SIGPIPE signal (which translates to a
re
Public bug reported:
When i'm scrolling or watching a video there is a horizontal line
flickering in the middle of the screen. It doesnt matter if i use an
external monitor or the monitor of my laptop.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature
This bug was fixed in the package click -
0.4.46+17.04.20170607.3-0ubuntu1
---
click (0.4.46+17.04.20170607.3-0ubuntu1) zesty; urgency=medium
* Rename the python package this installs from click to click_package.
(LP: #1693226)
* Use the correct overlayfs module name for the c
This bug was fixed in the package click -
0.4.46+16.10.20170607.3-0ubuntu1
---
click (0.4.46+16.10.20170607.3-0ubuntu1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Rename the python package this installs from click to click_package.
(LP: #1693226)
* Use the correct overlayfs module name for the
This bug was fixed in the package click - 0.4.43+16.04.20170613-0ubuntu1
---
click (0.4.43+16.04.20170613-0ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium
* Rename the python package this installs from click to click_package.
(LP: #1693226)
-- Kyle Fazzari Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:14:46 +
-
The verification of the Stable Release Update for click has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a re
This bug was fixed in the package click -
0.4.46+16.10.20170607.3-0ubuntu1
---
click (0.4.46+16.10.20170607.3-0ubuntu1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* Rename the python package this installs from click to click_package.
(LP: #1693226)
* Use the correct overlayfs module name for the
Thanks Lukasz.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696402
Title:
chroot configuration strictly depends on overlayfs
Status in click package in Ubuntu:
Fix Rel
Due to a bug in apport's method for creating a duplicate signature, the
DuplicateSignature in this report was incorrect. We are fixing that now,
sorry for the noise!
** Attachment added: "DuplicateSignature.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698670/+attachment/4898611/+files/DuplicateSignat
This bug was fixed in the package click -
0.4.46+17.04.20170607.3-0ubuntu1
---
click (0.4.46+17.04.20170607.3-0ubuntu1) zesty; urgency=medium
* Rename the python package this installs from click to click_package.
(LP: #1693226)
* Use the correct overlayfs module name for the c
Autopkgtests in -proposed passed for both series, considering this as
verified.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done-yakkety verification-done-zesty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe
The verification of the Stable Release Update for click has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a re
** Attachment removed: "DuplicateSignature.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698610/+attachment/4898221/+files/DuplicateSignature.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Due to a bug in apport's method for creating a duplicate signature, the
DuplicateSignature in this report was incorrect. We are fixing that now,
sorry for the noise!
** Attachment added: "DuplicateSignature.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698610/+attachment/4898622/+files/DuplicateSignat
** Attachment removed: "DuplicateSignature.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698670/+attachment/4898219/+files/DuplicateSignature.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
Affects trusty too. A quick way to reproduce this is (works 9 times out of 10
here):
$ bash -c 'read -N 1000' < /dev/urandom
Trusty output:
$ bash -c 'read -N 1000' < /dev/urandom
malloc: ../.././builtins/../.././builtins/read.def:603: assertion botched
realloc: start and end chunk size
Although chromium-browser is affected by the issue, it doesn't appear to
be the cause of the issue itself (other apps like gnome-terminal appear
to be similarly affected), so I'm marking this bug invalid for chromium-
browser.
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 964705 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964705
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 964705 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964705
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 964705 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964705
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better.
I marked this bug as duplicate of bug #964705.
Could you please take some time to open one more bug for the udev rule
you
We tested this in xenial, yakkety and zesty proposed, together with snapcraft
for bug #1692102.
No issues found with the rename of the package, and now snapcraft can be
updated without problems.
I've just marked this as verified.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-
Just expanding a little bit more my last comment, on Ubuntu 17.04, using
the 'sudo openconnect xxx' command is adding to the file
/run/resolvconf/resolv.conf file the DNS IP addresses as global ones.
Just also added them on the 'icon' version and it fixed it too. In
Ubuntu 17.04 it's using by defau
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better.
Since there isn't enough information in your report to differentiate between a
local configuration problem and a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking this bug as
Incomplete.
If indeed this is a local configuration prob
On my Ubuntu 17.04 (also happened on 16.10, upgraded to 17.10 that same
machine) the bug it's happening to me. My current workaround is to use
an equivalent 'openconnect'.
Command issued in my case:
sudo openconnect --user my-vpn-user --csd-user my-local-unix-user
--csd-wrapper ~/csd-wrapper-
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
