Paul A. Crable:
> Is there some way to keep TOR out of the hands of sleazebags and
> crooks?
No. The entire point is that no one is censored. To allow some form of
censorship would only put pressure to allow even more censorship with
time, and trust and anonyminity would be broken.
As can be see
grarpamp:
> http://shofarnexus.com/Blog-2015-01-13
Under "The hole in TOR":
> If you see a 456 byte message sent from computer A and a moment later
> the same or similar size message arrive at computer B you could draw
> an obvious conclusion.
But, Tor cells are a fixed-size of 512 bytes:
https:/
mtsio:
> If you to Preferences->Applications->Portable Document Format there
> is the option 'Preview in Tor Browser' that opens the PDF without
> opening an external application. What's the problem with that?
Well, Mozilla announced a secadv for pdf.js recently, so there's that.
https://www.mozi
Akater:
> Note: I'm using Tor for Twitter for some time
I have been as well, and I've also received that notice from twitter.
I don't think I'm a particularly suspicious or special person to any
government, should we pass this off as a false alarm triggered by using
tor to twitter, or is there a r
tor-ad...@torland.me:
> Metrics portal shows a drop of around half million direct connecting users:
>
> https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html
>
> Does someone has a good explanation what happened? The top 5 countries show
> the same drop. Is this another botnet that got kno
This is/was also being discussed at
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-onions/2016-January/26.html
Suggestions so far are "a2dismod status" as you said, or as a more
general solution, binding the onion service to an address other than
127.0.0.1.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lis
Mirimir:
> I'd say that conspiracies among Tor Project employees and volunteers
> to force out and humiliate a key employee would be a serious matter,
> with obvious impact on Tor development. So it's not just Jacob's
> behavior that must be reviewed. It's also the behavior of the lynch
> mob. And
