On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Nathan Freitas wrote:
>>> This means we can support SIP calling over Tor, video conference and
>>> streaming, among other applications...
>
>> Tor as a client also needs support for inbound binds for some apps, at
>> least at the single per port level when interact
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014, at 01:40 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Nathan Freitas wrote:
>
> >> This means we can support SIP calling over Tor, video conference and
> >> streaming, among other applications...
>
> Tor as a client also needs support for inbound binds for som
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Nathan Freitas wrote:
>> This means we can support SIP calling over Tor, video conference and
>> streaming, among other applications...
Tor as a client also needs support for inbound binds for some apps, at
least at the single per port level when interacting wi
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> Is there any reason we shouldn't consider supporting UDP over Tor with
> Orbot, by tunneling the packets using the combination of badvpn's
> tun2socks and udpgw ("udp gateway") feature?
There's no reason raw IP itself (any/none of its numbe
Is there any reason we shouldn't consider supporting UDP over Tor with
Orbot, by tunneling the packets using the combination of badvpn's
tun2socks and udpgw ("udp gateway") feature? This has come up as we are
implementing the Android VPNService, and discovered how easy to
implement and well perfor