Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-27 Thread Mansour Moufid
Hi "Randolph", Do you know these developers?: http://sourceforge.net/users/mikepery http://sourceforge.net/users/perrymikey What funny coincidences... I'll just leave this here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sourceforge/report_inappropriate ___ to

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-24 Thread Geoff Down
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012, at 05:34 PM, Karsten N. wrote: > On 08/24/2012 06:03 PM, Randolph D. wrote: > > the browser update 1.35 has been released to the > > testers and they have sent no failures back, > > Because Dooble v. 1.35 did not run on my Linux64 test system. > (I have had no problems to get

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-24 Thread Karsten N.
On 08/24/2012 06:03 PM, Randolph D. wrote: > the browser update 1.35 has been released to the > testers and they have sent no failures back, Because Dooble v. 1.35 did not run on my Linux64 test system. (I have had no problems to get v. 1.31 running.) > so dooble is working proper and quite well

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-24 Thread Randolph D.
okay, so here we go again: the browser update 1.35 has been released to the testers and they have sent no failures back, so dooble is working proper and quite well with tor. thanks for QUOD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM. It now can be bundled to Tor as just another package. Regards . 2012/8/18 Karsten N. >

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net

2012-08-17 Thread adrelanos
With Weather Eye Open: > Original Message > >> From: Nick Mathewson >> >> We release a piece of software called TorBrowser. I don't know >> how much more simple I can make that, Randolph. We *already* use >> that name for one of the components of the TBB. > > While I hate to

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net

2012-08-17 Thread With Weather Eye Open
Original Message > From: Nick Mathewson > > We release a piece of software called TorBrowser. I don't know how > much more simple I can make that, Randolph. We *already* use that > name for one of the components of the TBB. While I hate to be the cynic, perhaps it's time to

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-17 Thread Alexis Megas
Hi, Uploaded. Please remove $HOME/.dooble before using 1.35. Please also verify that Settings->Security->Display... is disabled. I tested 1.35 with respect to DNS queries alongside Wireshark (I removed DNS filters). The results were positive for both HTTP and FTP, that is, Wireshark didn't detect

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net

2012-08-17 Thread antispam06
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 20:11, A. Megas wrote: > My turn. Cool! We're having a contest! > You're insinuating that some dark conspiracy is at work with Dooble. > Dooble This is a Straw Man Fallacy. Check it out on the web, although you might be using it on purpose. I was not insinuating. I was

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net

2012-08-16 Thread Matthew Finkel
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Randolph D. wrote: > TBB =/ Torbrowser > website redesgined in blue Though imitation is the highest form of flattery, you should really just redesign your site. Create your own CSS and maybe try using a 3-column design instead of just 2...provides much more flexib

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net

2012-08-16 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Randolph D. wrote: > TBB =/ Torbrowser We release a piece of software called TorBrowser. I don't know how much more simple I can make that, Randolph. We *already* use that name for one of the components of the TBB. When you install TBB, it puts an icon on your

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-16 Thread SiNA Rabbani
Do you need help with a brand new design? I am willing to buy you a custom template so you can have a great looking site and not look like Tor's official site. :) Just send me the link to one that you like: http://themeforest.net/ All the best, SiNA Randolph D.: > Hello > there is preparation d

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-16 Thread Karsten N.
Hi, please post a download link for version 1.35 (Linux64) I will test it again. On 08/16/2012 08:23 PM, Randolph D. wrote: > there WAS in version dooble 1.31. QFP used, which leaked the Proxy for DNS > this problem has been solved: > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50622 The bug is not

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net

2012-08-16 Thread Randolph D.
TBB =/ Torbrowser website redesgined in blue disclaimer added twice. the domain exists since 2 years and no webkit browser ever has bundle. let´s see what progress can be made. 2012/8/16 Nick Mathewson > > I wish rename software, redesign website, and > actually warn his users that his stuff

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-16 Thread SiNA Rabbani
I have been actively working with the Tor Project. When I saw the page on sourceforge I thought oh, Tor has a new site, and I am not your normal Tor user. I use it religiously. Randolph, your page does confuse users with Tor's official site. --SiNA Nick Mathewson: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:35

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net

2012-08-16 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:11 PM, A. Megas wrote: > My turn. Alexis, I don't think this "antispam" guy is talking about Dooble the browser. He's talking about "Randolph"/"Perrymike"/whoever's so-called "TorBrowser." He's talking about "that package" and a "Dooble Bundle" to distinguish it from t

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-16 Thread Randolph D.
well for the cool down some facts: there WAS in version dooble 1.31. QFP used, which leaked the Proxy for DNS this problem has been solved: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50622 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1108293&aid=3523760&group_id=238964 someone on this list test

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net

2012-08-16 Thread A. Megas
My turn. You're insinuating that some dark conspiracy is at work with Dooble. Dooble isn't a scam. It's a Web browser with real users, real feedback, and real goals. It's one thing when you harass other projects that intend to use or misuse it (or misrepresent it) and another when you're attacking

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net

2012-08-16 Thread Randolph D.
Hi antispam you are an activist for 120 % right?, the mailinglist is not only populated with developers, but as well with people like you propagating the apocalypse. We should be on the same direction. I guess you are not a developer? Andrew Lewman asked in the developer team what to do and sent a

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net

2012-08-16 Thread antispam06
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 03:21, A. Megas wrote: > As for leaking IP information, we work with a framework (Qt) that has > issues and limitations. Every release of Dooble includes detailed > information covering all of the fixes and improvements. > > Thanks. So the package is unfit. As most people

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-16 Thread antispam06
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 01:50, Matthew Finkel wrote: > I mostly ignored this thread because I didn't think it was a big deal. > I figured the name of your new web browser would most likely confuse > people, but that could easily be changed once enough people convinced > you of that. But then I act

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Randolph D.
If you look in the web, there are many many browsers bundled with tor. the domain we speak about has been established by a russian coder who overgave the project to be able to use a new browser. We created this username for Mike Perry, so he can overtake the login and use the domain for the TBB, as

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Randolph D.
Mathew, you did not look close and are just stepping into a train, This project has not yet published any files. The given files are there since 2010 and use firefox. Didn ´t you realise that? since 2 years there has been no idea about this and we just changed the website to an open source template

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:26 PM, dumbnewbie wrote: > I did a brief check but didn't determine the answer - is perrymikey > (http://sourceforge.net/users/perrymikey) the same as mikeperry > (https://blog.torproject.org/blogs/mikeperry)? Absolutely not. And unless there really is some other guy

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread dumbnewbie
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Randolph D. wrote: > As you already can see on the website, it is added (maybe done later than > you looked first): > > "TorBrowser Source code is open source and not affiliated with Tor, but > simply use Tor. "Tor" and the "Onion Logo" are registered trademarks of

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread A. Megas
Hi, Randolph has good intentions, although his approaches require refinement. I've asked him several times to discontinue promoting Dooble to the Tor community. I'm responsible for Dooble, but I can't control its existence beyond Sourceforge. The official site for Dooble and its Wiki entry (as of

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread A. Megas
Do you mind testing a beta release of 1.35 with respect to this issue? Thanks. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Karsten N. wrote: > On 08/16/2012 01:06 AM, A. Megas wrote: > > I recorded some raw and extremely verbose tcpdump data while visiting > > ftp.debian.org using version 1.35 of Dooble.

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Matthew Finkel
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Randolph D. wrote: > As you already can see on the website, it is added (maybe done later than > you looked first): > > "TorBrowser Source code is open source and not affiliated with Tor, but > simply use Tor. "Tor" and the "Onion Logo" are registered trademarks of

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Karsten N.
On 08/16/2012 01:06 AM, A. Megas wrote: > I recorded some raw and extremely verbose tcpdump data while visiting > ftp.debian.org using version 1.35 of Dooble. I'm unable to locate any > mention of the visit in the log. I also visited ftp.netbsd.org as I may > have some cached DNS queries. My browsi

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread A. Megas
onsider the latest release? > > >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Karsten N. >> Date: 2012/8/15 >> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/ >> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I te

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Randolph D. wrote: > As you already can see on the website, it is added (maybe done later than > you looked first): > > "TorBrowser Source code is open source and not affiliated with Tor, but > simply use Tor. "Tor" and the "Onion Logo" are registered trademarks of

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread A. Megas
What do you consider the latest release? > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Karsten N. > Date: 2012/8/15 > Subject: Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/ > To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > > > Hi, > > I tested the latest Dooble re

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Randolph D.
Hi Karsten thanks for the test, I remember that there is as well a bug url already in webkit to address this issue. that´s why development is needed, maybe as well from the tor project to provide a patch! Each third user is affected. Render Engine Total Avg Trident 50.19% Web Kit 29.49% Gecko 19.9

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Randolph D.
As you already can see on the website, it is added (maybe done later than you looked first): "TorBrowser Source code is open source and not affiliated with Tor, but simply use Tor. "Tor" and the "Onion Logo" are registered trademarks of the Tor Project, Inc. Content on this site is licensed under

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Karsten N.
Hi, I tested the latest Dooble release with SOCKS5 proxy (with Tor) and HTTP proxy (with JonDo) and the preconfigured I2P proxy for eepsites. It leaks DNS queries and FTP requests in all cases. Yes - it leaks DNS queries with the preconfigured I2P proxy too. At first the system DNS resolver (defi

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:09:03 +0200 "Randolph D." wrote: > the domain exists for years, it has been acquired for the Qt update, > see the given 2010 release with still firefox. From what I can tell, it didn't look like this since 2010. > As there it TBB, Tor Browser Bundle, the TorBrowser shoul

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Randolph D.
https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/#security 1. Dooble uses Qt's proxy implementations. QFtp is not used. IP address retrieval (feature to show the IP of the website, shown in the title of the website) does not yet use proxies. The mechanism may be disabled by the user and so sh

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Randolph D.
Hi Georg, the browser has improved a lot and what you mention, is webkit related, if I remember right. So does Tor inform all users for all the Webkit Browser? Let´s research on that more to find a risk analysis. Regards 2012/8/15 Georg Koppen > > there is preparation draft work done to get the v

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-15 Thread Georg Koppen
> there is preparation draft work done to get the vidalia Qt plugin out for > the TorBrowser based on Dooble Web Browser 1.35 with lots of security > improvments. > Is there something to change on the drafted website? Yes, you should inform your users that Dooble (and thus your TorBrowser clone) h

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-14 Thread antispam06
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012, at 22:09, Randolph D. wrote: > the domain exists for years, it has been acquired for the Qt update, see > the given 2010 release with still firefox. > As there it TBB, Tor Browser Bundle, the TorBrowser should not affect > this. Than why do you advertise it here if pushing th

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-14 Thread Randolph D.
the domain exists for years, it has been acquired for the Qt update, see the given 2010 release with still firefox. As there it TBB, Tor Browser Bundle, the TorBrowser should not affect this. It has been there for years, why should the domain be now a spot to look at? there could be a link to the c

Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-14 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:38:13 +0200 "Randolph D." wrote: > Hello > there is preparation draft work done to get the vidalia Qt plugin out > for the TorBrowser based on Dooble Web Browser 1.35 with lots of > security improvments. > Is there something to change on the drafted website? > > http://tor

[tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/

2012-08-14 Thread Randolph D.
Hello there is preparation draft work done to get the vidalia Qt plugin out for the TorBrowser based on Dooble Web Browser 1.35 with lots of security improvments. Is there something to change on the drafted website? http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/ Can the Tor Onion be shown in the First Featur