Hi,
in my opinion it's a very good idea (even if this response comes with
several weeks delay) - but I'm not sure whether the available software
will do the job. I try to explain my concerns:
> People should be able to create encrypted containers
> ...
> It's of course of major importance th
Nice :) after getting it working, I could upload an (semi functional) image
of the jail and some configuration directives so others can copy :)
2011/4/5 Moritz Bartl
> On 05.04.2011 14:52, Gijs Peskens wrote:
> > I'm thinking of setting up a webbased os within an hidden service. [...]
>
> Good i
Well it might not stop them, but I do hope that they at least think about it
and not ruin it for other users. I don't see any other way anyhow, without
checking on what users are doing on the machine which is just what I don't
want to do (in order to protect their privacy and my non-involvement in
On 05.04.2011 14:52, Gijs Peskens wrote:
> I'm thinking of setting up a webbased os within an hidden service. [...]
Good idea. We might be able to supply infrastructure.
Also see http://www.headstrong.de/projects#gpg-rapidshare
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Gijs Peskens wrote:
< snip >
> I would however add a disclaimer that I don't want it to be used for
> childporn/snuff-stuff (or other things of extreme questionable morals) and
> that I count on the honesty of the users to stay within these bounds.
>
< snip >
>
>
I'm thinking of setting up a webbased os within an hidden service. What I'm
thinking of is having 10 accounts (or more/less depending on server load)
which are publicly accesable and have a shared storage (i.e. people can save
documents/files but they are visible to others), and an option to use
bi
