> 1. Shouldn't we also include
> socksuser=nobody
Use tcpdump to see if socat is setting a string here.
Either way, Tor does not require it, but read the Tor
manpage on that.
> 2. I have studied the socat man page, but still cannot figure out what
> bind=localhost
listens on
>
On: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:23:13 -0500, grarpamp wrote:
>> I have been using socat to torify connections. Since I was unsure
>> where a network address was being translated
>
>tor-resolve is not needed, socat is sufficient.
>Both can resolve dns via socks4a and/or socks5.
>Verify the behavior with t
> I have been using socat to torify connections. Since I was unsure
> where a network address was being translated
tor-resolve is not needed, socat is sufficient.
Both can resolve dns via socks4a and/or socks5.
Verify the behavior with tcpdump, etc.
___
I have been using socat to torify connections. Since I was unsure
where a network address was being translated, I supposed that I could
avoid the issue by first using tor-resolve to translate the address to
a numerical IPV4 address, and then pass that to socat.
I have now been told that this use
