Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3 - Dirty workaround to avoid user local-tor in Linux

2011-10-13 Thread unknown
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:28:52 +0100 Julian Yon wrote: > OOI, what's your rationale for believing that your globally configured > tor is more secure than the one in TBB? 1. Globally configured tor provided specially for Debian-Linux from http://deb.torproject.org . Signigicant part of Tor-netwo

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3 - Dirty workaround to avoid user local-tor in Linux

2011-10-13 Thread Julian Yon
On 13/10/11 21:32, unknown wrote: > In Linux system daemons more secure than user-running programms by design. I'm not going to respond to all your points. Some are reasonable enough. But this statement worries me. If we were talking about OpenBSD I'd still raise an eyebrow, and Linux has a far b

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3 - Dirty workaround to avoid user local-tor in Linux

2011-10-13 Thread Julian Yon
On 13/10/11 20:19, unknown wrote: > May be developers just give TBB-Linux users non-default config options: "Use > system Tor". > Please, don't enforce to use TBB with local Tor for advanced users! > Don't ruin a flexibility of transparency tor-firewalling and > security of using /etc/init.d/tor

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3 - Dirty workaround to avoid user local-tor in Linux

2011-10-13 Thread unknown
> > > : Hope that Debian packages with separated tor-daemon itself, Tor-browser > > and > > : Tor-browser-plugins will be created sometime > > > > This is unlikely unless someone else does the work. > Dirty workaround recipe: 1. Leave your transparency torifying iptables-firewall rules as is

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3

2011-10-12 Thread andrew
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:36:25PM +, unkn...@pgpru.com wrote 2.5K bytes in 65 lines about: : Now firefox started and working wihout crash but I see : this error message again. And I lost all my bookmarks with this. did it call a different profile? : Hope that Debian packages with separated

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3

2011-10-12 Thread unknown
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:01:33 -0400 wrote: > did it call a different profile? Before this I just use full path without start-script and not bother about profiles. This version not working without changing $HOME environment variable to `pwd` in start-script. OK, I use relative path to start To

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3

2011-10-12 Thread unknown
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:18:14 + unknown wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:39:46 +0400 > unknown wrote: > > > We talk about it day ago on some web-resource. Possible with you personally > > :-) > > > > Linux provided system Tor-daemon seems more secure then tor started from > > user. > > > >

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3

2011-10-12 Thread unknown
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:39:46 +0400 unknown wrote: > We talk about it day ago on some web-resource. Possible with you personally > :-) > > Linux provided system Tor-daemon seems more secure then tor started from user. > > I propose next steps but concern about any "Gotcha!" here: > > 1) Downloa

Re: [tor-talk] Trouble with 2.2.33-3

2011-10-12 Thread andrew
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:18:14PM +, unkn...@pgpru.com wrote 2.0K bytes in 52 lines about: : > Linux provided system Tor-daemon seems more secure then tor started from user. Seems and is may be two different things. : Is it version developed especially for enforcing use TBB as is? No, but