Re: [tor-talk] Tor version in OpenWRT Backfire

2012-03-22 Thread James Brown
On 24.02.2012 17:53, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Hi, > > The tor version in the current stable OpenWRT, 10.3.1 "Backfire", is > 0.2.1.30, which complains on startup that it is too old. I would like > to get a more recent version included in Backfire. > > Could any of the tor developers comment w

Re: [tor-talk] Tor version in OpenWRT Backfire

2012-02-24 Thread Chris
This probably isn't a good approach. It would probably be better to write a program for the OpenWRT implementation that regularly checks for newer versions and downloads+installs as necessary automatically. You would need to have it check the asc file too of course. There isn't a need to include an

Re: [tor-talk] Tor version in OpenWRT Backfire

2012-02-24 Thread Mr Dash Four
The tor version in the current stable OpenWRT, 10.3.1 "Backfire", is 0.2.1.30, which complains on startup that it is too old. I would like to get a more recent version included in Backfire. Could any of the tor developers comment which version of tor is suitable for inclusion in a long-term st

Re: [tor-talk] Tor version in OpenWRT Backfire

2012-02-24 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
On 02/24/2012 09:53 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Hi, > > The tor version in the current stable OpenWRT, 10.3.1 "Backfire", is > 0.2.1.30, which complains on startup that it is too old. I would like > to get a more recent version included in Backfire. > > Could any of the tor developers commen

[tor-talk] Tor version in OpenWRT Backfire

2012-02-24 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Hi, The tor version in the current stable OpenWRT, 10.3.1 "Backfire", is 0.2.1.30, which complains on startup that it is too old. I would like to get a more recent version included in Backfire. Could any of the tor developers comment which version of tor is suitable for inclusion in a long-term