Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-08 Thread Andreas Krey
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 11:41:14 +, CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote: > Open source and compiling from source is best option. Hopefully there > are enough programmers that are able to interpret the source code > examining it. Although the source code may be good, most users do not > compile fro

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-08 Thread CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Not Friendly wrote: I do not understand why those people think that Tor is a honeypot by the federal government. It is OPEN SOURCE. If you are by any means worried look at the source code and compile it ma

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread grarpamp
On 6/8/16, carlo von lynX wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Not Friendly wrote: >> I do not understand why those people think that Tor is a honeypot by >> the federal government. It is OPEN SOURCE. If you are by any means >> worried look at the source code and compile it manually.

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread carlo von lynX
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Not Friendly wrote: > I do not understand why those people think that Tor is a honeypot by > the federal government. It is OPEN SOURCE. If you are by any means > worried look at the source code and compile it manually. There is no > hiding a backdoor. Unles

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread Anthony Papillion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 6/7/2016 1:30 PM, Rick Evans wrote: > Could be Tor is not a honey pot, maybe it is Tar Baby. > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Not Friendly > wrote: > >> On 2016-06-07 13:48, Anthony Papillion wrote: >> > On 6/7/2016 12:13 PM, Not Friendly w

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread Rick Evans
Could be Tor is not a honey pot, maybe it is Tar Baby. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Not Friendly wrote: > On 2016-06-07 13:48, Anthony Papillion wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> On 6/7/2016 12:13 PM, Not Friendly wrote: >> >>> On 2016-06-07 02:35, a...@cock

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread Not Friendly
On 2016-06-07 13:48, Anthony Papillion wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 6/7/2016 12:13 PM, Not Friendly wrote: On 2016-06-07 02:35, a...@cock.lu wrote: First they fall for the social justice meme thinking it's a force for good. Then they allow the project to be infiltr

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread Anthony Papillion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 6/7/2016 12:13 PM, Not Friendly wrote: > On 2016-06-07 02:35, a...@cock.lu wrote: >> First they fall for the social justice meme thinking it's a force >> for good. Then they allow the project to be infiltrated by the >> blue haired problem glasses

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread Not Friendly
On 2016-06-07 02:35, a...@cock.lu wrote: First they fall for the social justice meme thinking it's a force for good. Then they allow the project to be infiltrated by the blue haired problem glasses brigade. Then they start modifying their community guidelines to appease their new members, probab

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread Chris Dagdigian
One small upside at least -- I'll selfishly admit that having a /redpill type pop up to excrete rants about "SJWs" did allow me to win a small bet. I've almost got my MRA buzzword bingo card filled out. Having it arrive via the cock.lu domain was just extra sprinkles on the flaccid little cupc

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread Kevin
I don't understand your rant. Tor is nowhere near death. On 6/7/2016 2:35 AM, a...@cock.lu wrote: First they fall for the social justice meme thinking it's a force for good. Then they allow the project to be infiltrated by the blue haired problem glasses brigade. Then they start modifying the

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread Александр
Excellent post, aaa! 2016-06-07 9:35 GMT+03:00 : > First they fall for the social justice meme thinking it's a force for good. > Then they allow the project to be infiltrated by the blue haired problem > glasses brigade. > Then they start modifying their community guidelines to appease their new

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread T F
Blame! Tor is working fine! Western Governments are guilty and corrupt like the Eastern the Implantate by the West. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-07 Thread I
rubbish -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

[tor-talk] RIP Tor

2016-06-06 Thread aaa
First they fall for the social justice meme thinking it's a force for good. Then they allow the project to be infiltrated by the blue haired problem glasses brigade. Then they start modifying their community guidelines to appease their new members, probably under the guise that it's to prevent e