On 13-11-02 02:54 AM, DeveloperChris wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 12:39 AM, mick wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:59:39 +1030
>> DeveloperChris allegedly wrote:
>>
>>> Could exit nodes act as caches. I know that would introduce a number
>>> of issues including a compromised exit node revealing what was
On 01/11/2013 12:39 AM, mick wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:59:39 +1030
DeveloperChris allegedly wrote:
Could exit nodes act as caches. I know that would introduce a number
of issues including a compromised exit node revealing what was
retrieved by that node (but not whom for) so if it was lim
Whats up with this dickhead?
On 01/11/2013 4:03 AM, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
On 31.10.2013 07:29, DeveloperChris wrote:
Project Gutenberg wouldn't block proxies without good reason. The
trouble is without knowing the reason its hard to find a fix.
One possible reason hinted in the message
On 10/31/2013 11:53 AM, Manfred Ackermann wrote:
> Hi antispam06.
>
> I just did it without asking for permission ;-) Same result ... it still
> comes out of a Tor IP.
>
> If someone can offer a STunnel or Proxy on a Non-Tor-IP we just bypath
> there counter-measure with our counter-counter-meas
On 31.10.2013 19:38, Lars Noodén wrote:
On 10/31/2013 09:07 PM, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a mirror. After all,
the works are in the Public Domain.
The original works are in the public domain, but the new, electronic
editions may not be. But either w
On 10/31/2013 4:41 PM, Michael Wolf wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 3:07 PM, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
>> On 31.10.2013 17:53, Manfred Ackermann wrote:
>>> I just did it without asking for permission ;-) Same result ... it still
>>> comes out of a Tor IP.
>>
>> AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a
On 10/31/2013 3:07 PM, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
> On 31.10.2013 17:53, Manfred Ackermann wrote:
>> I just did it without asking for permission ;-) Same result ... it still
>> comes out of a Tor IP.
>
> AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a mirror. After all, the
> works are in the Public
On 10/31/2013 09:07 PM, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
> AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a mirror. After all, the
> works are in the Public Domain.
[snip]
The original works are in the public domain, but the new, electronic
editions may not be. But either way, their issue is with spiderin
On 31.10.2013 17:53, Manfred Ackermann wrote:
I just did it without asking for permission ;-) Same result ... it still
comes out of a Tor IP.
AFAIK you don't need permission for creating a mirror. After all, the
works are in the Public Domain.
If someone can offer a STunnel or Proxy on a No
Hi antispam06.
I just did it without asking for permission ;-) Same result ... it still
comes out of a Tor IP.
If someone can offer a STunnel or Proxy on a Non-Tor-IP we just bypath
there counter-measure with our counter-counter-measure ;-)
http://64l2vhqwbj3mlia7.onion/ebooks/search
Greetings,
On 31.10.2013 13:19, krishna e bera wrote:
Would Project Gutenberg accept a Hidden Service mirror site?
Can you do it?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:59:39 +1030
DeveloperChris allegedly wrote:
> Could exit nodes act as caches. I know that would introduce a number
> of issues including a compromised exit node revealing what was
> retrieved by that node (but not whom for) so if it was limited to a
> few popular 'safe' sit
Having exit nodes retain information makes them more tempting to seize
or compromise. Also, if caches can serve more than one client (which
they would have to if reducing bandwidth usage is the goal), it puts
them at higher legal risk of copyright infringement prosecution.
Would Project Gutenberg
Project Gutenberg wouldn't block proxies without good reason. The trouble is
without knowing the reason its hard to find a fix.
One possible reason hinted in the message is they have bandwidth issues.
Which raises an interesting thought. Interesting to me anyway.
Could exit nodes act as cac
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:58:49 +
antispa...@sent.at wrote:
> On 30.10.2013 19:14, Georg Koppen wrote:
> > Works for me.
>
> The relevant line was:
>
> >> Don't use anonymizers, open proxies, VPNs, or TOR to access
> >> Project Gutenberg.
I wrote a letter several months ago to Project Gutenber
On 30.10.2013 19:14, Georg Koppen wrote:
Works for me.
The relevant line was:
Don't use anonymizers, open proxies, VPNs, or TOR to access
Project Gutenberg.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi
antispa...@sent.at:
> Maybe you all know that, but it came as a shock to me. I'm quite sure a
> few months ago it used to work. Not well, some of the exits were
> blocked. But anyway:
>
> http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/search/
>
> Error 403
>
> To fix this error:
>
> Don't use anonymizers,
Maybe you all know that, but it came as a shock to me. I'm quite sure a
few months ago it used to work. Not well, some of the exits were
blocked. But anyway:
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/search/
Error 403
To fix this error:
Don't use anonymizers, open proxies, VPNs, or TOR to access P
18 matches
Mail list logo
