Re: [tor-talk] phantom protocol

2014-12-15 Thread grarpamp
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:42 AM, str4d wrote: > As far as the design goes, it is most similar to I2P's protocol. I > have only read (most of) the original whitepaper[0] so far, and AFAICT > at a high level it is almost identical to I2P, except for a few > specific points (e.g. using IPv4 for ident

Re: [tor-talk] phantom protocol

2014-12-15 Thread str4d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 grarpamp wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Jonathan Wilkes > wrote: >> I'm asking here because it does onion routing, so maybe someone >> here has investigated its design and/or implementation. > > Fully DHT decentralized routing, no exits,

Re: [tor-talk] phantom protocol

2014-12-14 Thread grarpamp
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > Does anyone here know about the Phantom Protocol: > https://code.google.com/p/phantom/ > > It looks like it's abandonware, although someone sent a message to the list > that they had done some tests with virtual machines. The HESSLA is pro

[tor-talk] phantom protocol

2014-12-14 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
Hi Tor people, Does anyone here know about the Phantom Protocol: https://code.google.com/p/phantom/ It looks like it's abandonware, although someone sent a message to the list that they had done some tests with virtual machines. My main question is this: how does it bootstrap? I'm asking here

[tor-talk] Phantom protocol

2011-03-17 Thread Eugen Leitl
Any opinions: http://www.reddit.com/r/coding/comments/g5e19/been_tracking_this_for_2_years_now_the_phantom/ ? -- Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org __ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota