[tor-talk] Entry

2016-01-25 Thread 0001 1110
> > If you want more details than the faq entry provides, here are three > hopefully useful links for more reading: > Links source FAQ for Entry Guard meaning. > > (It sounds like you don't think the guard relay design > Math works. User should have control to separate connec

Re: [tor-talk] Entry

2016-01-14 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:31:39AM +0100, 0001 1110 wrote: > > Please see https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#EntryGuards for > > further details. > > Clarity link no provide. If you want more details than the faq entry provides, here are three hopefully useful links for more read

[tor-talk] Entry

2016-01-14 Thread 0001 1110
> > On January 15, 2016 at 12:52 AM kleft wrote: > > malformed entries... > ...see more when picked > > Please see https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#EntryGuards for > further details. > Clarity link no provide. 0000 -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lis

Re: [tor-talk] Entry

2016-01-14 Thread kleft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I'm not actually sure but I think this behavior results from one of the Tor security features. It's about to minimize the risk of using malformed entries cause choosing only a few random nodes as entry guards seems to be still better than a random s

[tor-talk] Entry

2016-01-14 Thread 0001 1110
I understand circuit isolation in Tor Browser but see same entry every circuit, no matter site. Will you explain? Thx. 0000 -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk