On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i've been thinking some days ago that the Tor infrastructure maybe a
> very valuable infrastructure also for other software that would like to
> stay distributed without a "central directory".
Basically, there are som
On 5/30/12 3:18 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
> wrote:
>> So basically "on top of Tor software and Tor Infrastructure" it would be
>> possible to build other kind of networks, given that they participate to
>> the Tor network itself.
>
> An
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
wrote:
> So basically "on top of Tor software and Tor Infrastructure" it would be
> possible to build other kind of networks, given that they participate to
> the Tor network itself.
And the directory authorities could freely attack such u
On 5/30/12 2:08 PM, krishna e bera wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:38:10AM +0200, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
>> i've been thinking some days ago that the Tor infrastructure maybe a
>> very valuable infrastructure also for other software that would like to
>> stay distributed without a "cen
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:38:10AM +0200, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> i've been thinking some days ago that the Tor infrastructure maybe a
> very valuable infrastructure also for other software that would like to
> stay distributed without a "central directory".
>
> In order to do so, a serv
Hi all,
i've been thinking some days ago that the Tor infrastructure maybe a
very valuable infrastructure also for other software that would like to
stay distributed without a "central directory".
In order to do so, a server-software for a distributed network, may also
run a Tor Relay and write i
