On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:02:33 +, Simon Brereton wrote:
...
> As I understand it, 3G devices were assigned a unique public IP. 4G
> devices on the same tower, however, share a public IP and VZW uses NAT
> (so the device actually has a 10.x.x.x private IP).
Having the IP fixedly assigned to the
On 4/9/12 8:03 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> They don't have much more relevant logs than the usual provider (which
> only needs the IP address to be able to point to a specific user).
>
> The NAT is an interesting thing by itself: Usually, interested parties
> will only come up with an IP address to
On 9 April 2012 00:19, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> On 04/06/2012 05:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> It's my understanding that Verizon (at least) differs the way it
>> assigns IP addresses for 4g/LTE devices as opposed to 3G ones. Is
>> this a point of concern for Orbot?
>
> Is there any more informa
On 04/06/2012 05:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
> It's my understanding that Verizon (at least) differs the way it
> assigns IP addresses for 4g/LTE devices as opposed to 3G ones. Is
> this a point of concern for Orbot?
Is there any more information you can provide about this?
It really should not
I don't think I would change anything,
HardKor
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Simon Brereton <
simon.brere...@buongiorno.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> It's my understanding that Verizon (at least) differs the way it
> assigns IP addresses for 4g/LTE devices as opposed to 3G ones. Is
> this a point of
Hi
It's my understanding that Verizon (at least) differs the way it
assigns IP addresses for 4g/LTE devices as opposed to 3G ones. Is
this a point of concern for Orbot?
Simon
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproj
