might want to be aware of this story.
Lucia
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
o have recently hit that particular forum
with requests similar to those above, you would be served the 503 too. The
IP I use hasn't been banned there, so I am served the forum page.
Lucia
> Read the thread at
> http://www.spambotsecurity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2095
7;t know how widespread it is.
Lucia
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:57:58 +0200
> From: "Karsten N."
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Many more Tor users in the past week?
> Message-ID: <52205e96.8050...@awxcnx.de>
> Co
violently opposed
to Tor being blocked. You can find people who do block tor on the thread
linked below:
http://www.spambotsecurity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2095
Read the thread and then ask people on that forum why they block Tor.
Warning: I suspect you probably can't log in o
x27;m going to tell
you you are flat out wrong.
Your saying "Last time" or getting angry or quoting Star Wars or trying to
explain people isn't going to change the fact that these 3rd parties don't
own any Tor users anything and they don't "need to respect"
ervice". It is my hobby blog.
>>...And in: https://twitter.com/lucialiljegren/status/316243078161776641
>>[Cludflare User]: Is there anyway to setup blocking of tor exit nodes?
>>[Lucia]: Get the IPs here: http://exitlist.torproject.org/exit-addresses
>>Extract them, then s
> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 08:57:48 +0200
> From: Lunar
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] WebGL forbidden in NoScript but Flash is not?
> Message-ID: <20130508065748.GA975@loar>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Joe Btfsplk:
>> OK, thanks for detailed rep
A while back
Moritz Bartl
Wrote:
>Sites that sometimes get hit by random scans and the like, not currently
under active attack, could also obviously benefit from torslap. I
haven't read the whole thread, but (Re)CAPTCHA could be considered a
cheap and powerful "proof of work", too.
When consider
...
>> I wouldn't touch your IP range a single time. I'd just set up a lot of
DNS to point there, and have lots of pages point to those domains. Then
the googlebot whould try to fetch all the 404 pages, and get blocked.
No the googlebot wouldn't get blocked by my scripts if you did this.
Others al
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 20:45:36 +0200
>From: Andreas Krey
>To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>Subject: Re: [tor-talk] torslap!
>>On Thu, 02 May 2013 13:19:59 +, Lucia Liljegren wrote:
>>...
>>Because these "not attackers" are guessi
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 11:03:52 +0200
> From: Moritz Bartl
>
> [...]
> The second and most common type of blocking happens after someone has
> been "attacked" once, or twice, via Tor, or an active "attack" is
> ongoing. I use quotation marks here because most things that happen
With respect to:
grarpamp grarpamp at gmail.com
Sun Apr 21 13:05:11 UTC 2013
I'm sure you think you somehow speak the truth about something, But I you are
very confused about what people who run servers are permitted to do. They are
permitted to block by IP for any reason they see fit even if
them they are not allowed to visit until they fix their
browser.
If you want to know more, you could ask Cloudflare. They tend to be very
willing to answer anything.
> > Lucia added:
> > Yes, I do see those codes passed in $_SERVER["HTTP_CF_IPCOUNTRY"].
> > from t
> In reply to:
> From: grarpamp
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
First: I apologize for any dethreading that might occur. I cut and pasted the
title from the digest. As I said: If you can explain how to avoid dethreading,
I'd welcome the information. In the meantime, I am going to cut and p
grarpamp at gmail.com
I reply to the digest which contains the subject "grarpamp at gmail.com " I
clicked "reply" but recongizing that's not a useful title, I cut and paste a
relevant subject. All additional dethreading is caused by the mail server.
I noticed this dethreads so I posted th
Reply to:
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:32:54 -0400
From: grarpamp
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] CloudFlare
>Some of them even have that as their advertised featureset,
This was precisely my point. It also shows why you were utterly incorrect to
suggest that
> "Though
Ciprian Dorin Craciun
Ciprian Dorin Craciun
>. But in a large portion (99.9...%) the population is a normal "Internet"
>citizen:
>non-technical, using an assortment of Facebook, YouTube, etc...
Because they have an international appeal Facebook, YouTube and other large
international servi
> Though I don't think I'd apply a permaban, because whatever IP is bothering
> you will eventually get pulled at the source before long.
The IP wont' eventually be pulled if it's on rdsnet.ro. ;)
In any case, I'm not asking what you would do. I'm telling you what I do. I
keep lists of IP rang
I use Cloudflare. When I experience hacking, spamming scraping or any other cpu
sucking activity, I use Cloudflares API and ban the IP then unban 7 days later.
If the IP falls in a pre-identified 'dirty' range, I never unban it. Based on
my logs I had the distinct impression Cloudflare did not
If you can connect with some TOR addresses but not this one, it may just be
this IP blocked. If you can't connect with any TOR IPs, it's likely TOR
specific. Otherwise, you'll have to ask the admin.
Lucia
___
tor-ta
20 matches
Mail list logo
