> On May 2, 2021, at 4:14am, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:16:08PM -0400, d...@foundingdocuments.org wrote:
>> Why would tor running as an onion service write this to its log?
>>
>> Apr 29 02:06:22.000 [warn] {APP} Requested exit point
>
Why would tor running as an onion service write this to its log?
Apr 29 02:06:22.000 [warn] {APP} Requested exit point ‘$1FINGER-PRINT-XYZ*’ is
not known. Closing.
Among other stuff, the torrc contains:
SOCKSPolicy reject *
SocksPort 0
ExitRelay 0
ExitPolicy reject *:*
In case it’s relate
Before tor 0.4.4.7 I was able to build tor with the latest versions of this
software: zlib, libressl, libevent. Each of which I built as a static library.
x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (I tried static tor a long time ago and failed, and
haven’t tried since.)
Now, after much testing I find the only
>>> Not too long ago I used Tor Browser to visit a website and found I was
>>> rejected completely. Not even a captcha. Clicking new circuit many times
>>> didn’t help either.
>>> A day or two later I heard back. It was gracious enough but supposedly the
>>> blocking was to protect customers (
Not too long ago I used Tor Browser to visit a website and found I was rejected
completely. Not even a captcha. Clicking new circuit many times didn’t help
either.
At least their site wasn’t just a stiff arm giving me the finger. It actually
had a note saying if I thought it was blocked in err
For best practices sake, I found it a good idea to double check my settings;
since the GUI in the Preferences is no longer there.
Typing “about:config” in the address bar, then typing “proxy.n” was the fastest
way to bring up that option.
Context-click/Right-click on that line, a menu pops up
> On Nov 16, 2019, at 5:31am, grarpamp wrote:
> On 11/15/19, d...@foundingdocuments.org wrote:
>> 1) VPN
>>
>> 2) Tor
>
> Keep in mind that both entites are essentially in the
> business of selling their own sort of reasonably
> good yet well caveated p
> On Nov 16, 2019, at 5:26pm, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 01:50:18PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 11/15/2019 11:57 AM, d...@foundingdocuments.org wrote:
>>> A few-days-old review.
>>>
>>> Since Brave is the browser for OnionBro
A few-days-old review.
Since Brave is the browser for OnionBrowser on iOS, I figured I’d read the
article.
https://www.pcworld.com/article/3453376/brave-10-review-this-excellent-privacy-focused-browser-can-make-you-money-too.html
> Not only can you open a private window, but you can open an eve
> Old Subject Line:
> Re: [tor-talk] Let's Encrypt Certificate Upgrade Blocks Tor.
> MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_REQUIRED_TLS_FEATURE_MISSING
>
> New:
> Re: [tor-talk] Tor (Firefox) Blocked by GoDaddy Lack of OCSP Response.
You may laugh now. :-)
$ openssl s_client -connect FoundingDocuments.org:443 -
Jun 03 23:02:51.000 [warn] Rejecting SOCKS request for anonymous connection to
private address [scrubbed]. [2 similar message(s) suppressed in last 300
seconds]
I have done some reading on what this means but am still unclear. I see this
warning because I %include a ‘log notice’ line. Using To
> Secure Connection Failed
>
> An error occurred during a connection to foundingdocuments.org. A required
> TLS feature is missing. Error code:
> MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_REQUIRED_TLS_FEATURE_MISSING
>
> • The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of
> the received dat
Dear Tor-Talk,
Once I heard about Tor's abilities to get a service out past NATs I was very
excited.
Now I am stuck trying to reach it.
I'm trying to figure out the pieces of synchronizing my to-do list from my
computer's WebDAV server with my mobile device. On my mobile there's a
companion
I have a confession to make.
I have probably blocked Tor, unintentionally at least. But any blocking I’d
turned on has been turned off.
Maybe for up to 14 years it’s been pretty easy for website operators to see
basic log information like IP addresses connecting to the website and CPU use.
O
14 matches
Mail list logo
