ots should come pre-configured like this. If
they did, we would have many more open networks and perhaps much less of an
excuse to aggressively filter known Tor IPs.
-wendell
grabhive.com | twitter.com/hivewallet | gpg: 6C0C9411
On Nov 22, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> And w
rk at once, thus de-anonimizing Tor
and fully terminating its (presumably) present benefits?
-wendell
grabhive.com | twitter.com/grabhive | gpg: 6C0C9411
On Aug 6, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> You need to actually provide the bandwith to convince the network. If
> you manage to br
So if I could somehow convince the network that my nodes were the fastest, I
could capture all of the Tor traffic?
-wendell
grabhive.com | twitter.com/grabhive | gpg: 6C0C9411
On Aug 6, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> That assumption is a bit skewed. Most of the time fast relay w
What is the status of Hidden Service development, at present? Are there still
no developers?
-wendell
grabhive.com | twitter.com/grabhive | gpg: 6C0C9411
On Aug 4, 2013, at 10:47 PM, Patrick wrote:
> For those who are curious, here's an in-depth guide to Freedom Hosting
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264767
A sample GUI app, a Tor-only web browser, is also included:
http://imgur.com/foY6R2R
-wendell
grabhive.com | twitter.com/grabhive | gpg: 6C0C9411
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor
