Ups, did not read before sending. Yes I think I will double check with
wireshark. Anybody knows wget very well to answer that question?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Tor User wrote:
> Anyway, my netfilter config wont allow any outgoing connections except
> from TOR.
>
>
&
Anyway, my netfilter config wont allow any outgoing connections except from
TOR.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:54 PM, David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Zebro kojos"
>
>
> I hope wget does not fill in http-proxy headers in its requests, i.e. no
>> info is leaking that way? I suppose not.
>>
>>
> When
Thanks. I will use something like this:
wget --user-agent="Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/5.0" --proxy --execute=http_proxy=http://127.0.0.1:8118/ -c
http://download.test
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Zebro kojos wrote:
> >
> >
> > > GNU WGET is 100% safe.
> >
Thanks. And I still need the http proxy. I cant do 127.0.0.1:9050, right?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Zebro kojos"
>
>
> If Tor is installed system-wide and the download site actually supports
>> resumes (if it's http, it may not; if it's ftp, it's bound to
Hi,
I think the most annoying thing using TOR are failed downloads. :-(
You try to download a 5MB file and the download stops various times and you
have to start over and over again, crossing all fingers to get the file
downloaded.
As Firefox does not support very good download management, its a
On 3/9/2012 9:17 AM, Tor User0000 wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was always wondering why I get the following pop-up message when
>> downloading a file. And it does not happen all the time. Why it says that
>> an external app is needed when only opening the download windo
Hi,
I was always wondering why I get the following pop-up message when
downloading a file. And it does not happen all the time. Why it says that
an external app is needed when only opening the download window?
*An external application is needed to handle:
https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrows
ing
127.0.0.1:9050 and the local TOR is listening. What protection could
be missed there?
Sam
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:34:10 +0000
> Tor User wrote:
>> Are there plans to give Linux users the choice to run the installed
>>
It depends on what you need. I don't need Vidalia and it's features
but I want TOR running as a local installed version because I like my
firewall script like it is.
Sam
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Greg Kalitnikoff
wrote:
>> >I suppose you shouldn`t run Tor and Firefox of TBB as different u
>I suppose you shouldn`t run Tor and Firefox of TBB as different users.
Why not?
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Greg Kalitnikoff
wrote:
> Which user do you use to run firefox 2nd time?
>
> I suppose you shouldn`t run Tor and Firefox of TBB as different users.
> Also if you check you may find t
>When you download a file does it warn you of a potential
>danger? If not you may not be getting all the benefits of using the same
>version as other TBB users.
There is no difference. It's the same Firefox with the same features.
(except 'New Identity' button)
I guess it's not a bad solution if y
Hi,
I'm a Linux user running TOR normally under the user debian-tor. Like
you suggested, I switched to TBB lately. That brings mi into some
trouble now as my firewall settings are based on the user debian-tor.
I'm not feeling very happy about opening the door for other
application nor running in a
12 matches
Mail list logo
