>Roger Dingledine wrote:
>>On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 02:22:22AM -, m...@tormail.net wrote:
>> Who is 93.114.40.75?
>>
>> The Tor check page lists it and says I'm not using Tor. Another user
>> reported this, too.
>That's a false negative. In this case it happens because the Tor relay
>exits
Robert Ransom wrote:
>Using multiple SocksPorts from the same Tor client only helps if you
>are using Tor 0.2.3.x-alpha, which introduced 'stream isolation'. (I
>don't think 0.2.2.x supports multiple SocksPorts at all.) Read the
>man page.
Multiple socks ports are in stable, we'll make the
>coderman wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:33 AM, wrote:
>>...
>> Application level leaks are problematic. We have a page which describes many
>> of these problems i>ncluding with workarounds (we recommend Tor Browser
>> etc.).
>these are significant if you are mixing tor and non-tor access
>rransom said:
>I'm more worried about the risks to user anonymity. It sucks to be
>the user reading about some sensitive subject when your apt cron job
>decides to poke every package source you install from. “Oh, that guy
>who keeps reading about Foozer's Disease must be in the
>Antarctica/McMur
