Roger Dingledine wrote:
Using any browser with Tor besides Tor Browser is usually a bad idea:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#TBBOtherBrowser
I disagree with that statement. It is certainly _not_ a bad idea, provided you
know what you are doing.
I don't use TBB, except when I am in "intern
is for a
different - older - version of gcc, but the point still stands).
For the time being, I use "tor_cv_cflags_Wlogical_op=no" to disable this
warning, but I am not sure whether this is the correct way of dealing with the issue.
[1] http://seclists.org/wireshark/2013/Jan/6
N
Nick Mathewson wrote:
Hi, all! There is a new alpha release of the Tor source code, with
fixes for a security bug. You should probably upgrade as packages
become available.
I am having trouble compiling this version. I get the WLogical-op warning and "logical
'&&' with non-zero constant will
Apologies for replying to this so late, but I've had a lot on my plate
recently...
I was finally able to test the newest version (below) with my set up (I use
customised firewall/transproxy settings and a vpn - all outside orbot).
The good news is that version now works with no major problems,
Nathan Freitas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016, at 11:12 PM, Nathan Freitas wrote:
Stay tuned for our next beta update.
Here's Orbot b15.1 Beta 2
(https://gitweb.torproject.org/orbot.git/commit/?id=a0b092856146e49b9c5056fc6f6adb070d76e0ef),
which addresses a number of issues that you referenced,
Nathan Freitas wrote:
I really don't understand how Orbot or Droidwalls iptables rules are
co-existing with Android VPN. This is really a new one for me. I will
make sure transproxy is working on Android 5.1 though, so that at least
we can be sure we didn't break anything.
I have completely re-de
I am having all kind of problems with this, but before I go into the details, a
bit of background.
Currently, I am running (quite happily) the "latest" Orbot, which uses tor
2.6(.10?) with no issues to report.
My android device uses droidwall with heavily modified firewall script, which restri
I've reported the above bug, but decided to post on here as well and seek some
advice.
It looks as though tor ignores the value of any of the specified options above and I cannot control this. In addition, when I fetch a hidden service, (.onion
address) sometimes, but not always, I get "Wanted
grarpamp wrote:
This phone appears to be Windows-based.
We have some trust in the MS stack concerning
ability to execute code and move packets properly.
Sniffing and sending the cleartext... that's an uknown
but is reasonably verifiable by watching the network.
You trust M$/Windows if
grarpamp wrote:
http://guardianrom.com/
This is a new find, thanks.
Interesting option this, pity the documentation is virtually
non-existent (how to build/use etc).
http://www.cryptophone.de/en/products/mobile/
There is no guarantee about hardware level security, as you
Karsten N. wrote:
Firefox search plug-ins for DuckDuckGo (SSL, Tor hidden...) you may find
at mycroftproject.com:
http://mycroftproject.com/search-engines.html?name=duckduckgo
Indeed. very useful too - it allows you to configure your search engine
the way you want it:
- to have/not hav
IMO, only stupid idiot doesn't use https with gmail.
That's why I think all talkings about gmail and beeing hacked is useless.
Let him set "Use always https" in the gmail settings, then log out, log in,
change password and secure q/answer and that's all.
This should be about Tor and Tor close
I can reach it via Tor; maybe you have a bad exit node or luck.
It must have been a glitch. I did restart tor and forced to reset its
data though and still couldn't get through. Tried about 10 minutes later
with the same result.
DDG seems to be back to normal I am pleased to confirm!
___
That didn't last long, did it?
The block seems to be across both http and https protocols on the same
domain (duckduckgo.com).
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Careful, troll.
It takes one to know one!
Mike is concerned with practical security against likely
adversaries, so his reasons for using the software might be nuanced,
depending on who he believes his adversary is. For example, his blog
post
https://grepular.com/Protecting_a_Laptop_from_Simp
Here's the app on the google market:
[...etc...]
For someone who "isn't affiliated" with this piece of closed-source
software (thus, questionable credentials as far as people's privacy is
concerned) you seem pretty determined to shove it down everyone's throat
quite intensely!
__
Incorrect. With Duckduckgo JS is optional. This wasn't always the
case, and they changed it to make people like us happy.
True, I take that back (see my previous post)!
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproje
duckduckgo.comf/html - without javascripts
Indeed (assuming it was "duckduckgo.com" - without the "f")!
For Firefox users out there -
http://mycroft.mozdev.org/search-engines.html?name=duckduckgo
and then pick up your choice of: 1) NO JS; 2) with SSL; and 3) NO
filter/Ads (I thought the
With Tor your privacy is disjoint from which search engine you use.
If by "disjoint" you mean irrelevant, I disagree - having tor does not
guarantee you privacy - this hard fact is communicated to everyone who
bothers reading the first line of output to the console when tor starts
- tor do
Others have mentioned them, and in my experience Duckduckgo, Ixquick,
and Startpage all work over Tor and HTTPS, and don't require
Javascript.
Nope, all of them do - one cursory look at the source of their main web
page will tell you that, not to mention that some of these "search
engines"
Are there any working Google scraper alternatives
https://startpage.com/
... or some alterantive actually
usable Tor-friendly search engine out there?
https://duckduckgo.com/
https://ixquick.com/
All of them are fucking shit [1] - if you value your own privacy, that is!
Besides the usual countries, my Bridge Usage Summary now shows "A1" with
no flag ("?" in the leftmost column). What does A1 mean?
- eliaz
ID: C3E1E38D
It is a range, which belongs to satellite devices (mobiles and the like)
and is normally not made to a specific country, as far as I kno
i would like to direct specific ports 995 and 465 to tor across system, instead
of using a global http/socks5 proxy for 'catch all'.
is privoxy/polipo the right tool for this? is proxytunnel useful also? i know
this is not a proxy howto list but can someone help or teach me to make some
spec
The tor version in the current stable OpenWRT, 10.3.1 "Backfire", is
0.2.1.30, which complains on startup that it is too old. I would like
to get a more recent version included in Backfire.
Could any of the tor developers comment which version of tor is suitable
for inclusion in a long-term st
He obviously doesn't want help, doesn't want to contribute &
apparently thinks somehow, if he says which addons he's using in
(Aurora?) that we could instantly look up his home address.
Nope, none of the above. As for whether I have to give you, or anybody
else, a comprehensive list of the bro
Due to the way in which you've been acting, you are no more trustworthy than a
fly-by-night website with a .cc domain.
I don't really care whether you think I am trustworthy or not - I am
certainly not going to lose any sleep over it, quite frankly.
Generally, when you make a claim that y
http://privatelee.com/
Javascript
Privatelee requires Javascript to work. We promise to not abuse your trust.
Please turn on Javascript to view Privatelee.com in action (domains
privatelee.com and qrobe.it). We do not display popups, non-text ads,
set any uniquely identifiable or any ad
Mr Dash Four is one of those people who write their letters in all caps
using large fonts because they don't really want to hear what we are
saying. Like a two year old, he wants his food handed to him on a
silver platter.
Yeah, as if! You don't really know me,
I'd rather figure out exactly what ixquick.com and startpage.com are doing. Is
it really so difficult for you to provide us with the names of the browser
plugins you used at the time?
Do you think I have the word "GOOFY" written across my forehead by any
chance?
Because you wont be taken seriously by anyone otherwise.
Eh?! Why do you think I care what you, or anybody, thinks? You and your
"low-key" friend are an irrelevance - I know what I saw when I accessed
those two sites earlier today and nothing will compel me to access them
ever again, or us
I have no reason to believe that you're actually
seeing that warning unless you provide some evidence.
Really?! And who the hell do you think you are, exactly?! Please
enlighten me, and explain why should I provide you with *any* additional
"evidence" at all?
Until I have read your "recom
A lot of sites are incredibly "broken" if javascript is disabled. NoScript would be one example of a "privacy plugin" that would thus cause a problem if enabled for some sites. It's why I'm curious as to what the plugin was that you were using. I haven't been using ixquick for very long, and s
I guess I'm just a bit confused, as I've not run into any issues or warnings with
ixquick.com yet. Were you able to determine what the possibly "problematic"
plugin was?
To put it simply - I am not at all interested in any of that.
If a search-engine site is there to present search resul
Again, the msg you are seeing may not accurately describe the problem.
It does to me! A search engine is interested in my browser privacy
settings and whether I use "privacy-oriented browser extensions". It
goes on to "advice" me to turn OFF my "privacy-oriented browser
extensions" in order t
Scroogle, is/was the best out there - by a mile! Nothing even comes close,
unfortunately!
What about ixquick.com?
See my previous posts on the subject.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-
Well, seeks does works fine with SSL, that's how my node is working.
Yeah, using some mickey-mouse self-signed certificate - you can't be
serious!
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailma
Would be interesting to find out which particular aspect of your configuration
is leading to that error message.
That is not the issue - the fact that startpage is snooping to see
whether I use "privacy-oriented browser extension" should be good-enough
reason for any sane individual out the
Why did you pick seeks over YaCy?
Neither are any good - from what I gather, yacy requires software
installed on my machine (yeah, right, why would I want to pollute my
machine with some unknown software for the "privilege" of using a bloody
search engine?) and seeks isn't any good either,
I've tried DuckduckGo, It isn't for heavy engine users. It seems like a
childrens search engine, and it has a lousy results format format.
I don't understand how Ixquick/Startpage can tap Google, yet Google goes
out of its way to crush Scroogle, which was by far the best out of what
I've found
I've started using this instead: https://startpage.com/
It provides Google search results, supports https, works without
javascript enabled, seems to be hosted in the Netherlands and they take
a good approach to privacy:
https://startpage.com/eng/protect-privacy.html
"You may be using a pri
Currently, what happens is that sites just ban/blacklist the IPs, often
automatically and "forever".
Yep!
Scroogle
Scroogle is currently having trouble scraping Google. Maybe Dash Fours
problems with it are unrelated to Tor?
Nope. I am well aware of this and it isn't an issue which
Yes. There are plenty of lists of open single-hop SOCKS proxies, and
software exists to "chain" SOCKS proxies. Just create a chain in some
such software that is Tor -> , and you've circumvented
such a block.
How? The exit node regularly changes and I'll be chasing shadows.
_
I am sick of them all!
Initially, there was a small number of these in the wild, but now it is
widely spread - google is the main offender, but youtube (which is, as
we all know, google-owned) and now, wait for it, scroogle.org (a site I
use a lot) is also at it!
Tor-blocking could be very e
43 matches
Mail list logo
