Re: [tor-talk] Which Dns?

Hello, Am 18.07.2016 um 08:39 schrieb Flipchan: > Can anyone recommend a good dns server? Censurfridns Denmark: http://blog.censurfridns.dk IPv4: 91.239.100.100 / IPv6: 2001:67c:28a4:: IPv4: 89.233.43.71 / IPv6: 2002:d596:2a92:1:71:53:: Xiala.net: https://xiala.net/services/dns.html

[tor-talk] I need TCP 443 Bridge!

https://bridges.torproject.org/ Please add "[X] TCP 443 only" checkbox! My stupid ISP doesn't allow other abnormal ports. I need obfs3 or obfs4(preferred) proxy. Any ideas? -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.to

Re: [tor-talk] webmail send while using TOR is tagged as spamends up in spam

Speculation: If evidence of Tor usage is in a header visible with full headers (a Yahoo display option), perhaps Yahoo uses that to waylay the email into a spam folder. The evidence might simply be an IP address associated with Tor usage. Maybe Gmail doesn't do the same thing. -- tor-talk maili

Re: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jon Tullett: > It is, you know. More complex, and probably not suitable. > > Haroon Meer, who I greatly respect in the security space, describes > UX complexity in terms of his mum. As in, "could my mum do this?" > and if the answer is no, it's too

Re: [tor-talk] Cloudflare reCAPTCHA De-anonymizes Tor Users

    __ Od: carlo von lynX Za: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org Datum: 19.07.2016 12:24 Naslov: Re: [tor-talk] Cloudflare reCAPTCHA De-anonymizes Tor Users On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:42:17AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > Cloudflare reCAPTCHA D

Re: [tor-talk] Cloudflare reCAPTCHA De-anonymizes Tor Users

  __ Od: carlo von lynX Za: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org Datum: 19.07.2016 12:24 Naslov: Re: [tor-talk] Cloudflare reCAPTCHA De-anonymizes Tor Users On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:42:17AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > Cloudflare reCAPTCHA De-

Re: [tor-talk] webmail send while using TOR is tagged as spamends up in spam

I'm surprised more people don't run their own mail. Using something like mailinabox (https://github.com/mail-in-a-box/mailinabox) wonder how hard it would be to fork it and create a version that is configured to use Tor / not leak DNS / etcetera. > On Jul 19, 2016, at 7:25 AM, MegaBrutal wrot

Re: [tor-talk] webmail send while using TOR is tagged as spamends up in spam

Hallo, Am 19.07.2016 um 07:13 schrieb Friet Pan: > use yahoo to mail with mailinglists but i use TOR to connect to yahoo. > > tuns out that all my posts now end up in everyones spam folders. SPAM filters are using the client IP in mail header for classification, if this information was added b

Re: [tor-talk] webmail send while using TOR is tagged as spamends up in spam

On 19 July 2016 at 07:13, Friet Pan wrote: > > So now i also wonder how many people on this list are not receiving THIS > message. For me gmail put your message (but not the replies) into Spam. Forgot to check the reason it gave, sorry. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org T

Re: [tor-talk] Cloudflare reCAPTCHA De-anonymizes Tor Users

On 19.07.16 12:42, grarpamp wrote: The only non-public prerequisite for the de-anonymizing entity is the ability to monitor traffic between ISPs and Tor entry nodes, and traffic entering Cloudflare servers (no decryption required in either case). How is this different from the correlation attack

Re: [tor-talk] webmail send while using TOR is tagged as spamends up in spam

2016-07-19 7:13 GMT+02:00 Friet Pan : > > So now i also wonder how many people on this list are not receiving THIS > message. It was tagged as SPAM, but luckily I always check my SPAM folder for false positives, so I unspammed it. This helps GMail to learn that this message is safe. To be precis

Re: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/19/2016 04:18 AM, Jon Tullett wrote: > On 19 July 2016 at 12:01, Mirimir wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 07/19/2016 03:50 AM, Jon Tullett wrote: >>> On 19 July 2016 at 08:31, Mirimir wrote: -BEGIN PGP

Re: [tor-talk] Cloudflare reCAPTCHA De-anonymizes Tor Users

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:42:17AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > Cloudflare reCAPTCHA De-anonymizes Tor Users Terrific information. I am informing the Italian community about this development: http://26pn427tgjbvovwx.onion/t/cloudflare-lo-strumento-di-sorveglianza-contro-lanonimato-di-tor-e-i

Re: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

On 19 July 2016 at 12:01, Mirimir wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/19/2016 03:50 AM, Jon Tullett wrote: >> On 19 July 2016 at 08:31, Mirimir wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 07/18/2016 07:08 PM, Jon Tullett wrote: On 18 Jul

Re: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/19/2016 03:50 AM, Jon Tullett wrote: > On 19 July 2016 at 08:31, Mirimir wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 07/18/2016 07:08 PM, Jon Tullett wrote: >>> On 18 July 2016 at 16:17, Mirimir wrote: -BEGIN PGP

Re: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

On 19 July 2016 at 08:31, Mirimir wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/18/2016 07:08 PM, Jon Tullett wrote: >> On 18 July 2016 at 16:17, Mirimir wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>> A few years ago, I wrote >>>

Re: [tor-talk] webmail send while using TOR is tagged as spamends up in spam

Hello. On 19.07.16 08:13, Friet Pan wrote: i use yahoo to mail with mailinglists but i use TOR to connect to yahoo. tuns out that all my posts now end up in everyones spam folders. Is this because the tor exitnodes are used by spammers? or is every mail that was send from a TOR user falsely m

[tor-talk] Cloudflare reCAPTCHA De-anonymizes Tor Users

https://cryptome.org/2016/07/cloudflare-de-anons-tor.htm 18 July 2016 Cloudflare reCAPTCHA De-anonymizes Tor Users A sends: Cloudflare's insistence on solving reCAPTCHA puzzles when visitors are coming from Tor exit nodes to one of the 2 million web sites that Cloudflare 'protects' can be very

Re: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

On 7/19/16, Mirimir wrote: > Well, given what we know of TLA capabilities, what Tor Project says at > is tantamount to false advertising: > > | Anonymity Online > | > | Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance > | and traffic analysis. ... >

Re: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/19/2016 12:02 AM, grarpamp wrote: > On 7/18/16, Mirimir wrote: >> Anyway, what does Tor Project gain by not mentioning Whonix? > > That's a bit sideways, but in the interest of sideways eventually > moving forward... I'd say "meta" rather tha