Re: [tor-talk] Accuracy of speed tests over Tor

2016-07-05 Thread krishna e bera
On 07/05/2016 06:51 PM, grarpamp wrote: > On 7/5/16, gdfg dfgf wrote: >> how accurate are this results? >> https://imgur.com/a/6cZjf > > Be sure whatever tool you're using is not in fact bypassing tor. > Browsers are often a quick hack, better standalone tools exist > for more accurate / in dept

Re: [tor-talk] Accuracy of speed tests over Tor

2016-07-05 Thread grarpamp
On 7/5/16, gdfg dfgf wrote: > how accurate are this results? > https://imgur.com/a/6cZjf Be sure whatever tool you're using is not in fact bypassing tor. Browsers are often a quick hack, better standalone tools exist for more accurate / in depth analysis. Beware poor use of terms "ping" is spec

Re: [tor-talk] Accuracy of speed tests over Tor

2016-07-05 Thread grarpamp
On 7/5/16, gdfg dfgf wrote: > how accurate are this results? > https://imgur.com/a/6cZjf Be sure whatever tool you're using is not in fact bypassing tor. Browsers are often a quick hack, better standalone tools exist for more accurate / in depth analysis. Beware poor use of terms "ping" is spec

Re: [tor-talk] Paper on traffic correlation

2016-07-05 Thread krishna e bera
On 07/05/2016 12:30 AM, Paul Syverson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:55:25PM +, Cannon wrote: >> >> Just a paper I found, thought you all might find it interesting. >> What are your thoughts on this? >> >> >> http://www.ohmygodel.com/publications/usersrouted-ccs13.pdf > > A work of penetr

Re: [tor-talk] tor with vpn

2016-07-05 Thread grarpamp
On 7/5/16, Mirimir wrote: > True. It's much more flexible. But it makes me nervous. This also makes > me nervous: Users just firing off scripts and whatever else they run like TBB without bothering to learn test validate anything at all... yeah. Ansible can 'rm -rf /' too, but at least it's there

[tor-talk] Accuracy of speed tests over Tor

2016-07-05 Thread gdfg dfgf
People always whine how Tor is slow but when I do a speed test over Tor I get amazing speeds comparable with my actual internet connection, how accurate are this results?   Screenshots of speed tests over Tor: https://imgur.com/a/6cZjf -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To

Re: [tor-talk] tor with vpn

2016-07-05 Thread Mirimir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/05/2016 05:38 AM, I wrote: >> I wrote: >>> Opera has built-in free VPN through several countries. >> > mirimir> It's not really a VPN, I think. > > What is it? According to spaze, it's just a HTTP/S proxy.[0] But even without that evidence, i

Re: [tor-talk] tor with vpn

2016-07-05 Thread I
>I wrote: >> Opera has built-in free VPN through several countries. > mirimir> It's not really a VPN, I think. What is it? -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] tor with vpn

2016-07-05 Thread me
"This connection mode works *ONLY* with AirVPN Client." Thus this is sensible only if you trust the source code of AirVPN Client. On 05.07.16 08:37, Solokov wrote: If you're using AirVPN, check it out: https://airvpn.org/tor/ message: Readers, Can someone please explain if it is possible to

Re: [tor-talk] tor with vpn

2016-07-05 Thread Mirimir
On 07/05/2016 01:34 AM, grarpamp wrote: > On 7/4/16, Mirimir wrote: >> Yes, VMs are heavyweight. But iptables rules for this are pretty >> trivial. Drop everything (input, forward and output). Accept output on >> eth0 only for user debian-tor. Accept all output on tun0. > > Sure that big hammer a

Re: [tor-talk] tor with vpn

2016-07-05 Thread grarpamp
On 7/4/16, Mirimir wrote: > Yes, VMs are heavyweight. But iptables rules for this are pretty > trivial. Drop everything (input, forward and output). Accept output on > eth0 only for user debian-tor. Accept all output on tun0. Sure that big hammer approach works for many. But it's not trivial, or