https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/06/federal-court-fourth-amendment-does-not-protect-your-home-computer
https://www.eff.org/files/2016/06/23/matish_suppression_edva.pdf
https://yro.slashdot.org/story/16/06/23/2040255/federal-court-the-fourth-amendment-does-not-protect-your-home-computer
The EFF r
On 6/23/16, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Is grarpamp ...
> who posted in support of Jacob Appelbaum banned? No.
Posts were more philosophical of nature, largely around cpunk realm,
and should not be interpreted for or against any particular individual[s].
That is all.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
And we are now clear on your choice to exercise your predatorial right
to arbitrary exercise of power. Fascism in action.
Get off the cross, we need the wood.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:37:08PM -0400, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> I've been fairly surprised that the response has been almost entirely
> positive. The 45-post thread on cypherpunks where Zenaan Harkness called me
> a "fake man" (classy) notwithstanding.
Taking out of context an "expressed suspi
I've been fairly surprised that the response has been almost entirely
positive. The 45-post thread on cypherpunks where Zenaan Harkness
called me a "fake man" (classy) notwithstanding.
And is Zenaan banned? No. Is grarpamp or most of the other people
who posted in support of Jacob App
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:49:44PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 6/21/2016 11:58 AM, Kate Krauss wrote:
> >Greetings, Tor Talkers!
> >
> >The US Department of Justice is trying to institute new rules that would
> >let the FBI hack computers that use Tor and other
> >privacy-protecting technologies
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 04:14:02PM -, Ben wrote:
> > Rules or policies should be enforced equally in an unbiased way. Even
> > moderated forums allow certain "unpermitted" discussions while deleting
> > / closing others immediately.
+100
And, any individual to be banned, when their posts ar
Tor Weekly news from April 4, 2016 mentioned Cloudflare's blog comment
on Tor.
A cookie exception IS set ( but "accept cookies from sites" is not
checked & "accept 3rd party cookies" = never) - which allows other
sites to set session cookie, if an exception is entered.
That setup allows _other
On 6/22/16, konst...@mail2tor.com wrote:
> I want to be clear about a couple of things. I am not looking to defy the
> wishes of Tor developers and relay contributors. I hope to get their views
> on the matter. Should they explicitly refuse, I will look at I2P.
When I ran, donated, managed relays
On 6/21/2016 11:58 AM, Kate Krauss wrote:
Greetings, Tor Talkers!
The US Department of Justice is trying to institute new rules that would
let the FBI hack computers that use Tor and other
privacy-protecting technologies--all over the world.
EFF and Tor are asking you to sign a petition or (if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sadly, an attack run through tor destined for a uk2 hosting provider is
being met with a null routes for exit nodes under a policy of "wont' be
lifting it any time soon". The group owns several brands spanning data
centers in a variety of areas and c
On 6/20/2016 7:10 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
If you want to read a lot more on this topic -- including how Tor's
design changed in response and how it still needs to change -- check
out the blog post here:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/improving-tors-anonymity-changing-guard-parameters
(Al
> Rules or policies should be enforced equally in an unbiased way. Even
> moderated forums allow certain "unpermitted" discussions while deleting
> / closing others immediately.
As much as I (and presumably everyone else) was getting sick of updates
on the topic coming into my inbox, there's d
Not taking sides - at all, but when a (some?) female Tor Project
employees were being harassed, there was massive, ongoing outpouring of
support & long, repetitious posts.
Which is fine, but it definitely wasn't on topic.
I agree w/ you in general about staying on topic, but when has that ever
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:10:36AM -0400, Chris Dagdigian wrote:
>
> Seriously? I spent some time trying to parse Juan's various messages
> yesterday to try to understand his point of view ... if you remove all of
> the insults and snide remarks the only concrete position I could discern was
> th
Seriously? I spent some time trying to parse Juan's various messages
yesterday to try to understand his point of view ... if you remove all
of the insults and snide remarks the only concrete position I could
discern was that he was legit upset over the marketing/PR approach of
the Tor projec
Hi,
Александр:
I tried to subscribe to the Tor list
(you know, this "anti-censorship" software list :D).
Got a message that i am banned. censored.
Like you, Juan, Zen, and a few others.
Banning people under the guise of 'Topic' is not going to shift the
focus away from Tor's lack of assuran
Hi Carlo, please see the comments/answers below
Le 22/06/2016 à 13:46, carlo von lynX a écrit :
> Hello Aymeric!
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:41:35PM +0200, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
>> Not a specialist with gnunet (how does peers discovery works with
> I think this talk is very worthwhile in explai
Le 22/06/2016 à 14:38, Paul Syverson a écrit :
> Roughly yes I was
> contrasting client/server with anything where every entity is both a
> participant and part of the routing infrastructure
But the Tor network itself is moving to this with for example
flashproxy, snowflake and maybe uproxy
Mayb
19 matches
Mail list logo
