On 2016-06-05 16:34, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2016-06-05 17:20, Allen wrote:
So randomizing the times that traffic enters the network and exits
the
network wouldn't work? Like it enters a note and 30 ms after received
or
another random delay couldn't it exit. It would be harder to
co
Hello to all. I was just on the tor network and launched google to do a google
search. I got a 403 forbidden when trying to search for something. I know this
might not be fixable, but Can this at least be noted somewhere? Here is the
contents of the error.
403. That’s an error.
Your client do
On 2016-06-05 22:44, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/05/2016 08:06 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
On Jun 5, 2016 10:28 PM, wrote:
It looks like our sender just compromised their anonymity (or at
least
finally switched to a psudonym). "Hi. I’m Nick Farr" (sent from the
same
address that sent the http://jaco
On Jun 5, 2016 11:44 PM, "Mirimir" wrote:
>
> On 06/05/2016 08:06 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> > On Jun 5, 2016 10:28 PM, wrote:
> >>
> >> It looks like our sender just compromised their anonymity (or at least
> > finally switched to a psudonym). "Hi. I’m Nick Farr" (sent from the same
> > address
On Jun 5, 2016 11:37 PM, wrote:
>> Oh OK, sorry for making that assumption.
Nah, no problem. Everybody is too stressed and worried in this moment.
Take care and be well! :)
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.tor
On 06/05/2016 08:06 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2016 10:28 PM, wrote:
>>
>> It looks like our sender just compromised their anonymity (or at least
> finally switched to a psudonym). "Hi. I’m Nick Farr" (sent from the same
> address that sent the http://jacobappelbaum.net/ link). We now h
On 2016-06-05 22:06, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
On Jun 5, 2016 10:28 PM, wrote:
It looks like our sender just compromised their anonymity (or at least
finally switched to a psudonym). "Hi. I’m Nick Farr" (sent from the
same
address that sent the http://jacobappelbaum.net/ link). We now have
more
On Jun 5, 2016 10:28 PM, wrote:
>
> It looks like our sender just compromised their anonymity (or at least
finally switched to a psudonym). "Hi. I’m Nick Farr" (sent from the same
address that sent the http://jacobappelbaum.net/ link). We now have more
information on who sent out the original mess
On 2016-06-05 19:50, Anthony Papillion wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 6:47 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/05/2016 05:36 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
On 6/5/2016 6:30 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrie
On 2016-06-05 19:47, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/05/2016 05:36 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
On 6/5/2016 6:30 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last time
IOError twee
On 2016-06-05 19:41, Anthony Papillion wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 6:35 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2016-06-05 19:30, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2016-06-
On 2016-06-05 19:36, Anthony Papillion wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 6:30 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last time
IOE
On 2016-06-05 19:13, Anthony Papillion wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 6:08 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
Hi Anthony.
I am really worried about Jake and contacted some friends in
common yesterday and today. I had no news until now.
I really don't know if he is
On 2016-06-05 19:02, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Personally the idea of storing a ton of data isn't the best for me
so rather I simply use Tor + private search engines and trust it to
protect me.
ton = ?
-Jonathan
On Sunday, June 5, 2016 6:15 PM, "notfrien...@riseup.net"
wrote:
On 2016-06-05
On 2016-06-05 18:43, Paul Syverson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 05:20:24PM -0400, Allen wrote:
>
> So randomizing the times that traffic enters the network and exits the
> network wouldn't work? Like it enters a note and 30 ms after received or
> another random delay couldn't it exit. It would
On 2016-06-05 15:38, jacob appelbaum (ioerror) questions wrote:
https://medium.com/@nickf4rr/hi-im-nick-farr-nickf4rr-35c32f13da4d
Hi. I’m Nick Farr. (@nickf4rr)
I used to be a pretty effective organizer working behind the scenes at
Hacker Events in Europe and on various projects back in the US
On 2016-06-05 17:52, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
On Jun 5, 2016 5:37 PM, "jacob appelbaum (ioerror) questions" <
jacobappelbaum@yandex.com> wrote:
The conspiracy of silence is unravelling around Jake and luckily, it
hasn’t been forty years.
My dear,
Sorry, I can't believe in someone who is usi
On 2016-06-05 20:38, ng0 wrote:
On 2016-06-05(03:24:16-0800), I wrote:
notfriendly,
This was a dig at the list.
When questions are asked to get help they are told to stop wasting
list attention and to be relevant or go elsewhere, but look at the
energy on the list today.
Jacob has contribu
On 2016-06-05 20:44, tor_t...@arcor.de wrote:
Hi Tor Talkers,
when a Tor developer gets harassed by FBI (talk is done already last
months) there is no doubt about whose side we are
when Jacob Appelbaum gets into sexual allegations (within the
community) i would have had no doubt to tell that th
Hi Tor Talkers,
when a Tor developer gets harassed by FBI (talk is done already last months)
there is no doubt about whose side we are
when Jacob Appelbaum gets into sexual allegations (within the community) i
would have had no doubt to tell that the community is up to he is innocent
until jud
On 2016-06-05(03:24:16-0800), I wrote:
>
> notfriendly,
>
> This was a dig at the list.
> When questions are asked to get help they are told to stop wasting list
> attention and to be relevant or go elsewhere, but look at the energy on the
> list today.
>
> Jacob has contributed to Tor and that i
On 2016-06-05 17:20, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/05/2016 03:55 AM, Cari Machet wrote:
it was umn ... sarcasm
Dude, you need to flag that in text comms :)
that any organization has not inset into its guidelines ways of really
structurally dealing with sexual misconduct is profoundly unethical
just
On 2016-06-05 19:14, Anthony Papillion wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last time IOError
tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list actually HEARD from
him since then?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 6:47 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> On 06/05/2016 05:36 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>> On 6/5/2016 6:30 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>>> On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
> On 2016-0
On 06/05/2016 05:36 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> On 6/5/2016 6:30 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>> On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last time
IOError tweeted was on 30 May. Has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 6:35 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
> On 2016-06-05 19:30, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>> On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The
On 2016-06-05 19:23, Anthony Papillion wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 6:20 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2016-06-05 19:08, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
Hi Anthony.
I am really worried about Jake and contacted some friends in
common yesterday and today. I h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 6:30 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>> On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
>>> On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last time
>>> IOError tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone
On 2016-06-05 19:30, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last time IOError
tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list actually HEARD from
him since then? We have
On 2016-06-05 19:24, I wrote:
notfriendly,
This was a dig at the list.
When questions are asked to get help they are told to stop wasting
list attention and to be relevant or go elsewhere, but look at the
energy on the list today.
Jacob has contributed to Tor and that is where my interest stops
On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
>> On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last time IOError
>> tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list actually HEARD from
>> him since then? We have to remember that Jake comes f
notfriendly,
This was a dig at the list.
When questions are asked to get help they are told to stop wasting list
attention and to be relevant or go elsewhere, but look at the energy on the
list today.
Jacob has contributed to Tor and that is where my interest stops. The rest is
for the peopl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 6:20 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
> On 2016-06-05 19:08, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
>> Hi Anthony.
>>
>> I am really worried about Jake and contacted some friends in
>> common yesterday and today. I had no news until now.
>>
>> I reall
On 2016-06-05 19:08, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
Hi Anthony.
I am really worried about Jake and contacted some friends in common
yesterday and today. I had no news until now.
I really don't know if he is receiving my messages or reading them and
I
tried to contact some CCC friends, but I don't know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
> On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last time IOError
> tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list actually HEARD from
> him since then? We have to remember that Jake comes from a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/5/2016 6:08 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> Hi Anthony.
>
> I am really worried about Jake and contacted some friends in
> common yesterday and today. I had no news until now.
>
> I really don't know if he is receiving my messages or reading them
Hi Anthony.
I am really worried about Jake and contacted some friends in common
yesterday and today. I had no news until now.
I really don't know if he is receiving my messages or reading them and I
tried to contact some CCC friends, but I don't know if he is in Berlin or
not.
He is, probably,
> Personally the idea of storing a ton of data isn't the best for me
so rather I simply use Tor + private search engines and trust it to
protect me.
ton = ?
-Jonathan
On Sunday, June 5, 2016 6:15 PM, "notfrien...@riseup.net"
wrote:
On 2016-06-05 17:59, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>> Anothe
Why are the people who know his being silent (or not responding to the
discussion)? What does it imply?
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Lara wrote:
>
> jacob appelbaum (ioerror) questions:
>> https://medium.com/@nickf4rr/hi-im-nick-farr-nickf4rr-35c32f13da4d
>>
>> Hi. I’m Nick Farr. (@nickf4rr)
jacob appelbaum (ioerror) questions:
> https://medium.com/@nickf4rr/hi-im-nick-farr-nickf4rr-35c32f13da4d
>
> Hi. I’m Nick Farr. (@nickf4rr)
A bunch of trolls inventing vague stories. The people who know Jake seem
silent. Yet sock puppets seem to know a lot. They have never talked
before, only no
On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The last time IOError tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list
actually HEARD from him since then? We have to remember that Jake
comes from a really fucked up childhood. Something like these
alleg
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 05:20:24PM -0400, Allen wrote:
> >
> > So randomizing the times that traffic enters the network and exits the
> > network wouldn't work? Like it enters a note and 30 ms after received or
> > another random delay couldn't it exit. It would be harder to correlate the
> > traff
On 2016-06-05 18:35, I wrote:
What are the current best things to do to a Debian VPS to stop being
puppeted by clever dicks?
Robert
I have a few suggestions:
* Use SSH Key Based Authnication only (no password based login)
* Update your software frequently
* Enable IPTables and only allow port
http://ethi.cx/forty.html
For Forty Years...
Joe Paterno – praised college football coach and idol to hundreds of thousands
of people – continued in silence, allowing Jerry Sandusky to nurture a
mechanism that leveraged the Penn State football program to prey on his
victims, which totals 32 at
What are the current best things to do to a Debian VPS to stop being puppeted
by clever dicks?
Robert
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The last time IOError tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list
actually HEARD from him since then? We have to remember that Jake
comes from a really fucked up childhood. Something like these
allegations could push someone over the edge.
Anthon
On 2016-06-05 18:17, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/05/2016 03:52 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
On Jun 5, 2016 5:37 PM, "jacob appelbaum (ioerror) questions" <
jacobappelbaum@yandex.com> wrote:
The conspiracy of silence is unravelling around Jake and luckily, it
hasn’t been forty years.
My dear,
Sorr
On 06/05/2016 03:52 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2016 5:37 PM, "jacob appelbaum (ioerror) questions" <
> jacobappelbaum@yandex.com> wrote:
>
>>> The conspiracy of silence is unravelling around Jake and luckily, it
> hasn’t been forty years.
>
> My dear,
>
> Sorry, I can't believe in
On 2016-06-05 18:13, df. wrote:
Nice speech, it looks like you put some time and effort in to it but
it would make a lot more sense to make a case against someone by
presenting factual evidence against that person and not trying to make
absurd comparisons on a mailing list between two things that
On 2016-06-05 17:59, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Another idea is to use
search engines that protect your privacy such as ixquick or duckduckgo
(they store search queries but they don't track individuals (I.e they
don't store your IP Address, as far as we know that is).
Those are solutions of a differe
Nice speech, it looks like you put some time and effort in to it but
it would make a lot more sense to make a case against someone by
presenting factual evidence against that person and not trying to make
absurd comparisons on a mailing list between two things that have
almost nothing in common.
> Another idea is to use
> search engines that protect your privacy such as ixquick or duckduckgo
> (they store search queries but they don't track individuals (I.e they
> don't store your IP Address, as far as we know that is).
Those are solutions of a different kind. What I'm trying to descri
On Jun 5, 2016 5:37 PM, "jacob appelbaum (ioerror) questions" <
jacobappelbaum@yandex.com> wrote:
>> The conspiracy of silence is unravelling around Jake and luckily, it
hasn’t been forty years.
My dear,
Sorry, I can't believe in someone who is using Jake's own name for posting
anonimously a
https://medium.com/@nickf4rr/hi-im-nick-farr-nickf4rr-35c32f13da4d
Hi. I’m Nick Farr. (@nickf4rr)
I used to be a pretty effective organizer working behind the scenes at Hacker
Events in Europe and on various projects back in the USA. After a deliberate
campaign of abuse orchestrated by Jake App
On 2016-06-05 17:37, juan wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 17:13:41 -0400
notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
So randomizing the times that traffic enters the network and exits
the network wouldn't work? Like it enters a note and 30 ms after
received or another random delay couldn't it exit. It would be h
On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 17:13:41 -0400
notfrien...@riseup.net wrote:
> So randomizing the times that traffic enters the network and exits
> the network wouldn't work? Like it enters a note and 30 ms after
> received or another random delay couldn't it exit. It would be harder
> to correlate the traff
On 2016-06-05 17:20, Allen wrote:
So randomizing the times that traffic enters the network and exits the
network wouldn't work? Like it enters a note and 30 ms after received
or
another random delay couldn't it exit. It would be harder to correlate
the
traffic right?
IMO, the packets would
On 06/05/2016 03:55 AM, Cari Machet wrote:
> it was umn ... sarcasm
Dude, you need to flag that in text comms :)
> that any organization has not inset into its guidelines ways of really
> structurally dealing with sexual misconduct is profoundly unethical
>
> just another way tor is super fucked
>
> So randomizing the times that traffic enters the network and exits the
> network wouldn't work? Like it enters a note and 30 ms after received or
> another random delay couldn't it exit. It would be harder to correlate the
> traffic right?
IMO, the packets would probably need to be randomly d
On 2016-06-05 14:34, grarpamp wrote:
On 6/5/16, Not Friendly wrote:
After about an hour of brain storming I may of found a way to stop
traffic
correlation attacks. The idea is to add an artificial delay of a few
randomized ms (two separate delays, one to the tor exit and another
deal on
traff
On 2016-06-05 16:36, jacob appelbaum (ioerror) questions wrote:
http://ethi.cx/forty.html
For Forty Years...
Joe Paterno – praised college football coach and idol to hundreds of
thousands of people – continued in silence, allowing Jerry Sandusky to
nurture a mechanism that leveraged the Penn St
On 2016-06-05 14:31, Flipchan wrote:
Got any beta code on this? Maybe add/c ode it as a daemon ?;)
Not Friendly skrev: (5 juni 2016 16:40:52
CEST)
After about an hour of brain storming I may of found a way to stop
traffic correlation attacks. The idea is to add an artificial delay of
a few ra
On 2016-06-05 13:46, juan wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:03:45 +0200
carlo von lynX wrote:
Julia Schramm who did everything
right,
https://torrentfreak.com/fail-prominent-pirate-party-politician-polices-book-pirates-120918/#disqus_thread
just in case some people still haven't realize
On 2016-06-05 13:38, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Prediction market (place your bids):
"First networks utilizing fill traffic as TA countermeasure to
emerge and reach early deployment by year end 2017..."
It's a bit off-topic, but it's worth keeping in mind what
the greater free software community is
On 2016-06-05 13:22, df. wrote:
I agree with Cecilia on this.
These are serious allegations but,
Allegations are not equal to Convictions.
Should this man not have the right to a fair trial?
The tor project is not about throwing someones rights out the window.
We all have opinions and are fre
On 2016-06-05 12:39, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
On Jun 5, 2016 12:32 PM, wrote:
Wow I just read the site. It makes me quite sad, the videos of his
presentations never indicated he would do something like that.
Sorry, we don't know if something happened or not, if Jake did
something or
not.
Som
On 2016-06-05 12:18, Cari Machet wrote:
Please do not demean turks thank you for your clear statement however
On Jun 5, 2016 6:33 PM, wrote:
In the few interactions I had with Jacob over the years he gave a vibe
of
being an arrogant, self-worshiping narcissist prick with with
delusions of
gra
On 2016-06-05 11:25, t...@sigaint.org wrote:
In the few interactions I had with Jacob over the years he gave a vibe
of
being an arrogant, self-worshiping narcissist prick with with delusions
of
grandeur and an ego the size of a small planet, but he has spent a
decade
in the Tor Project and desp
On 6/5/16, Not Friendly wrote:
> After about an hour of brain storming I may of found a way to stop traffic
> correlation attacks. The idea is to add an artificial delay of a few
> randomized ms (two separate delays, one to the tor exit and another deal on
> traffic exiting the network) and add an
Got any beta code on this? Maybe add/c ode it as a daemon ?;)
Not Friendly skrev: (5 juni 2016 16:40:52 CEST)
>After about an hour of brain storming I may of found a way to stop
>traffic correlation attacks. The idea is to add an artificial delay of
>a few randomized ms (two separate delays, one
On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:03:45 +0200
carlo von lynX wrote:
> Julia Schramm who did everything
> right,
https://torrentfreak.com/fail-prominent-pirate-party-politician-polices-book-pirates-120918/#disqus_thread
just in case some people still haven't realized that
"politician" mean
> Prediction market (place your bids):
> "First networks utilizing fill traffic as TA countermeasure to
emerge and reach early deployment by year end 2017..."
It's a bit off-topic, but it's worth keeping in mind what
the greater free software community is good at-- like
replicating data-- and wha
I agree with Cecilia on this.
These are serious allegations but,
Allegations are not equal to Convictions.
Should this man not have the right to a fair trial?
The tor project is not about throwing someones rights out the window.
We all have opinions and are free to share them, but it is irresp
On Jun 5, 2016 12:32 PM, wrote:
>> Wow I just read the site. It makes me quite sad, the videos of his
presentations never indicated he would do something like that.
Sorry, we don't know if something happened or not, if Jake did something or
not.
Some of my personal friends hate Jacob. Jake is
Please do not demean turks thank you for your clear statement however
On Jun 5, 2016 6:33 PM, wrote:
> In the few interactions I had with Jacob over the years he gave a vibe of
> being an arrogant, self-worshiping narcissist prick with with delusions of
> grandeur and an ego the size of a small p
In the few interactions I had with Jacob over the years he gave a vibe of
being an arrogant, self-worshiping narcissist prick with with delusions of
grandeur and an ego the size of a small planet, but he has spent a decade
in the Tor Project and despite his tragic character flaws he has achieved
mu
On 2016-06-05 11:03, carlo von lynX wrote:
Woah, looks like some people took those JTRIG slides quite literally.
The problem with (in)justice in open activist communities is
that, even should the facts be clear, those facts affect
private details of life of either contendants or third parties,
w
Woah, looks like some people took those JTRIG slides quite literally.
The problem with (in)justice in open activist communities is
that, even should the facts be clear, those facts affect
private details of life of either contendants or third parties,
which makes it inacceptable to disclose in pub
After about an hour of brain storming I may of found a way to stop traffic
correlation attacks. The idea is to add an artificial delay of a few randomized
ms (two separate delays, one to the tor exit and another deal on traffic
exiting the network) and add an extra chunk of randomized data (just
You can do it yourself. There's information on how to at the footer of
all messages in this mail list.
El 05/06/16 a las 13:25, Renate Margarete Wöhltjen-Baumann escribió:
> please delete my email-address fom the mailing list. I will no more
> receiving any emails from tor-talk.
>
> With kind reg
please delete my email-address fom the mailing list. I will no more
receiving any emails from tor-talk.
With kind regards, remawoba
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-tal
i dont like this leader stardum fucked upness - dont have leaders and they
cant take them out - but while you are feeling bad for an elitist please
maybe take 1 second to recognize the put upon on this globe
the letter fr Tor states that they were aware of some things before so...
On Sun, Jun 5,
it was umn ... sarcasm
that any organization has not inset into its guidelines ways of really
structurally dealing with sexual misconduct is profoundly unethical
just another way tor is super fucked up
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Mirimir wrote:
> On 06/04/2016 09:38 PM, Cari Machet wrote:
83 matches
Mail list logo
