Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

2016-05-12 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 2/7/16, grarpamp wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Tom A. wrote: >> Yes take care and look yourself or believe so called experts or >> multiplicators. > > Fine example of the classic passive shilling for GoldBug / BitMail, etc. > >> I agree that all closed source crypto is obsolete. >

Re: [tor-talk] ProtonMail

2016-05-12 Thread Anthony Papillion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/12/2016 03:05 PM, Alexis Wattel wrote: > Excerpts from Jerry Rocteur's message of May 12, 2016 2:47 pm: >> Hi, >> >> I tried to post this before but it never got to the list I >> think. I wanted to subscribe to ProtonMail, which I discovered

Re: [tor-talk] ProtonMail

2016-05-12 Thread Alexis Wattel
Excerpts from Jerry Rocteur's message of May 12, 2016 2:47 pm: Hi, I tried to post this before but it never got to the list I think. I wanted to subscribe to ProtonMail, which I discovered from reading posts here on this list. I wanted to get your opinion, is ProtonMail a good solution for

Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

2016-05-12 Thread Yuri
On 01/29/2016 05:05, anonymous coward wrote: what do you think about Bitmessage? Could it be, Bitmessage gives you some anonymity even without using TOR due to the way it works? Couldn´t TOR be extended in a way to work like Bitmessage? I guess BM is like a mesh or P2P thing, wouldn´t adding suc

Re: [tor-talk] ProtonMail

2016-05-12 Thread Lara
Jerry Rocteur: > I wanted to get your opinion, is ProtonMail a good solution for > encrypted mails or should I look at alternatives. What are your alternatives? > I’ve searched and read quite a few articles and I understand that Like? Give us some references? I am sure at least some would like t

Re: [tor-talk] fwd: FBI Is Pushing Back Against Judge's Order to Reveal Tor Browser Exploit

2016-05-12 Thread krishna e bera
followup- Mozilla files brief in the case to get disclosure before defendant: https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2016/05/11/advanced-disclosure-needed-to-keep-users-secure/ Since the case involves TorBrowser more directly than Firefox, will Tor Project legal team also file an /amicus curiae/ ? (The g

Re: [tor-talk] ProtonMail

2016-05-12 Thread ng0
On 2016-05-12(04:53:31+0300), Jerry Rocteur wrote: > > > On 12 May 2016, at 15:54, ng0 wrote: > > > > On 2016-05-12(03:47:55+0300), Jerry Rocteur wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I tried to post this before but it never got to the list I think. > >> > >> I wanted to subscribe to ProtonMail, which I

Re: [tor-talk] ProtonMail

2016-05-12 Thread Jerry Rocteur
> On 12 May 2016, at 15:54, ng0 wrote: > > On 2016-05-12(03:47:55+0300), Jerry Rocteur wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tried to post this before but it never got to the list I think. >> >> I wanted to subscribe to ProtonMail, which I discovered from reading posts >> here on this list. >> >> I wanted

Re: [tor-talk] ProtonMail

2016-05-12 Thread ng0
On 2016-05-12(03:47:55+0300), Jerry Rocteur wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to post this before but it never got to the list I think. > > I wanted to subscribe to ProtonMail, which I discovered from reading posts > here on this list. > > I wanted to get your opinion, is ProtonMail a good solution for

[tor-talk] ProtonMail

2016-05-12 Thread Jerry Rocteur
Hi, I tried to post this before but it never got to the list I think. I wanted to subscribe to ProtonMail, which I discovered from reading posts here on this list. I wanted to get your opinion, is ProtonMail a good solution for encrypted mails or should I look at alternatives. I’ve searched