It seems there's "some" interest in upgrading TorFlow? I can't in good
conscience say that -- without funding -- I alone can replace it -- but
I do have an out-of-date txtorcon exit-relay scanning system that could
*become* a "next gen" torflow.
I am ready and willing to provide mentorship to mak
> On Dec 10, 2015, at 5:09 PM, nusenu wrote:
>
>
>> we were investigating a way to more quickly stabilize to an accurate
>> weight. Obviously, we misconfigured that process. Sorry about that!
>
> Since 'stabilizing acccurate weight quickly' requires bwauths
> involvement: Are you implying that
> we were investigating a way to more quickly stabilize to an accurate
> weight. Obviously, we misconfigured that process. Sorry about that!
Since 'stabilizing acccurate weight quickly' requires bwauths
involvement: Are you implying that they were involved? (included in 'we')
--
tor-talk mailin
> On Dec 10, 2015, at 4:19 PM, coderman wrote:
>
> On 12/10/15, Rob Jansen wrote:
>> ...
>> That is definitely an error! I rebooted the nodes but it appears that their
>> consensus weights in the latest consensus have not been corrected. So I just
>> took them down now.
>
>
> thank you to eve
On 12/10/15, Rob Jansen wrote:
> ...
> That is definitely an error! I rebooted the nodes but it appears that their
> consensus weights in the latest consensus have not been corrected. So I just
> took them down now.
thank you to everyone for acting transparently and conservatively in
this situat
> After a bit of investiguation turns out 3 new relays were advertising a
> HUGE bandwidth.
The advertised bw should not really matter when we have bwauths
providing measurements, no?
So lets have a look at what measurements they provided here.
Example: consensus 2015-12-10 14:00:00 [1]
relay P
>
> On Dec 10, 2015, at 2:25 PM, David Goulet wrote:
>
> On 10 Dec (19:04:02), nusenu wrote:
>> take a look at the "e_prob" column:
>>
>> https://github.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/blob/master/2015-12-10_relay-families.txt
>>
>>
>> How did he manage to get such a high consensus weight
On 10 Dec (19:04:02), nusenu wrote:
> take a look at the "e_prob" column:
>
> https://github.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/blob/master/2015-12-10_relay-families.txt
>
>
> How did he manage to get such a high consensus weight
> (~10x ipredator's cw)?
>
>
>
> these four 0.2.7.5-dev relays
take a look at the "e_prob" column:
https://github.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/blob/master/2015-12-10_relay-families.txt
How did he manage to get such a high consensus weight
(~10x ipredator's cw)?
these four 0.2.7.5-dev relays were first seen on 2015-12-10 04:00:00
are down since a f
