I have to agree. crontab -e and add in the commands you want to run
automatically at set intervals.
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Michael McConville
> wrote:
>
> Flipchan wrote:
>> I tried to code an autoupdater for my tor relay, IF anyone is a
>> king/queen on node.js or got any other awnse
I tried to code an autoupdater for my tor relay , IF anyone is a king/queen on
node.js or got any other awnser on how to autoupdate ur server , i am almost
their but havent got it to work 100% , link: github.com/flipchan/autoupdater
--
Sincerly Flipchan
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists
Flipchan wrote:
> I tried to code an autoupdater for my tor relay, IF anyone is a
> king/queen on node.js or got any other awnser on how to autoupdate ur
> server, i am almost their but havent got it to work 100%, link:
> github.com/flipchan/autoupdater
Why not just a cron job with pkg_add, apt-ge
I tried to code an autoupdater for my tor relay , IF anyone is a king/queen on
node.js or got any other awnser on how to autoupdate ur server , i am almost
their but havent got it to work 100% , link: github.com/flipchan/autoupdater
Take care n keep it codein;)
--
Sincerly Flipchan
--
tor-ta
Ayesa, thanks for your advise. I have come to know from this incident
from a source and I am sorry for those employees. I shared the
information with [OT] tag to support the cause. I agree with you, they
need job first.
thanks
On Monday 30 November 2015 02:20 PM, Ayase wrote:
Bob, wit
Bob, with respect, stop. Have you ever considered the reason why they're
closing down and not paying anyone is because the company is absolutely broke?
It's a very common occurrence in economics for a business to appear booming and
fluid to the public, but have no money in actuality. Yeah, it s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
It turned out this was caused by AppArmor.
kernel: audit: type=1400 audit(1448884032.655:58): apparmor="DENIED"
operation="sendmsg" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path"
error=-13 profile="system__tor" name="run/systemd/notify" pid=4903
comm
Hi Philipp,
> The difference is caused by the protocol headers that are wrapped around
Tor cells;
> IP, TCP, and TLS.
How many bytes does TLS take?
if we say TOR cell is 512 bytes, then 512 + 20 (TCP) + 20 (IP) = 552 and
586 - 552 = 34 bytes for TLS. is it correct?
> How did you run your test?
