On 2015-08-30 11:24, Martijn Grooten wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 05:01:53PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 11:01:42 +, Martijn Grooten wrote:
>...
> >But a company that blocks Tor because, as IBM puts it, a lot of
> >malicious actors use Tor is making a sensible security
On 8/29/15, blaatenator wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The talk of Jacob at DebConf (especially the Citizen Four Q&A) got me
> thinking about hardware. I know that hardware rng's are suspect, and
> probably AES cpu extensions as well. And if Lenovo openly puts stuff in
> the BIOS, who knows what else might
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Udo van den Heuvel
wrote:
> On 2015-08-29 11:46, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > what about https://www.olimex.com/wiki/A20-OLinuXino-LIME2?
>
> Have one running here, very stable.
> Moreso than the pi.
>
hehe.. I've also one with 1GB of ram (+heat sink), totally de
Tor Weekly NewsAugust 30th, 2015
Welcome to the thirty-third issue in 2015 of Tor Weekly News, the weekly
newsle
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 05:01:53PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 11:01:42 +, Martijn Grooten wrote:
> ...
> > But a company that blocks Tor because, as IBM puts it, a lot of
> > malicious actors use Tor is making a sensible security decision.
>
> But that is not a reason to
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 11:01:42 +, Martijn Grooten wrote:
...
> But a company that blocks Tor because, as IBM puts it, a lot of
> malicious actors use Tor is making a sensible security decision.
But that is not a reason to block torproject.org or even to
forbid using the tor browser. It would be
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:14:52AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> Some places allow tor for personal use for the explicit reason that
> they don't wish to be involved with policing employees freetime
> traffic on break, want to offer segregation, etc, in exactly the same
> way they don't regulate your ce
