"
Apple Apple wrote:
Blocking Tor does not change the fact that you have an SQLi vulnerability
(or whatever).
The problem is not Tor but the logic that dictates it is easier and cheaper
to ban a few IP addresses than to actually secure your shit.
There really should be more focus on demanding hi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> If you work in a call center with a company computer, you have absolutely no
> reason to use Tor.
Some spend all day on Tor, including consulting with private
customers, researching issues over it, and interacting from IP's local
to th
IBM also develops surveilance hardware for oppressive regimes, no
surprise they are against free speech and democracy.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/02/eff-files-amicus-brief-case-seeks-hold-ibm-responsible-facilitating-apartheid
Anders Andersson wrote:
> I couldn't find what they mean with "
Hi Tom,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 03:42:49PM +0200, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Yes, my example was a simplification of the issue here. The point
> was that in some corporate environments (not all of them), the usage
> of Tor may be unwanted unless permission is explicitly given to the
Hi Paul,
Yes, my example was a simplification of the issue here. The point was that in
some corporate environments (not all of them), the usage of Tor may be unwanted
unless permission is explicitly given to the employee. Of course at a lot of
companies this is not true and IBM's advice should
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:08:26AM +0200, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> In some corporate environments this would be a reasonable thing to
> do. And the article that started this thread is about corporate
> networks.
>
> If you work in a call center with a company computer, you have
> absolutely no
On 27 Aug 2015 10:53, "cyb3rwr3ck" wrote:
> I am tired of hearing stuff like "the developers should do their
> homework and fix their shit"
Any yooha can stick PHP on their resume and get a job writing web
applications. Personally I mark the problem down as sheer incompetence on
the side of the d
Or maybe they do realize.
We already know that the NSA/GCHQ do not appreciate Tor (per their own
"Tor Stinks" report included within the Edward Snowden released
content). A process which over time encourages the internet at large
to reject Tor connections (plus makes ISPs generally unwilling
On 27.08.2015 10:50, spriver wrote:
> After downloading Tor I just had to set up the proxy
> in the network settings of Tor. It worked right out of the box. I was a
> bit surprised because we have a bit strict access list for websites and
> a really high security standard. (and I do not understand
Hi,
I will share my experience with getting into Tor out of my companies
network (one in the top ten of the biggest employers in Germany):
The website torproject.org is blocked entirely, but nearly all mirrored
websites do work. After downloading Tor I just had to set up the proxy
in the network
I may have glossed over much of the report after seeing them say 'Some are
whistleblowers or citizens of
repressive regimes with (allegedly) ³pure² motives.¹ - biased from the
outset.
IBM MSS data apparently shows an increase in attacks via Tor - ok, so
where is their data? What percentage of the
In some corporate environments this would be a reasonable thing to do. And the
article that started this thread is about corporate networks.
If you work in a call center with a company computer, you have absolutely no
reason to use Tor. If you did use Tor, it would most likely be a red flag tha
Blocking Tor does not change the fact that you have an SQLi vulnerability
(or whatever).
The problem is not Tor but the logic that dictates it is easier and cheaper
to ban a few IP addresses than to actually secure your shit.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe
Quoting Virgil Griffith :
"In general, networks should be configured to deny access to websites such
as www.torproject.org"
Blocking Tor exit nodes is one thing, but this is just bizarre. They could
make a claim that privacy from your boss is something they wish to prevent,
but I saw no such c
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:08 AM, CJ wrote:
>
> People using Tor for "bad things" just don't realize how they fuck up
> the whole thing. Not even mentioning "weird contents", just the script
> kiddies running metasploit/other through Tor.
If the realize or not is irrelevant. They don't care about
15 matches
Mail list logo
