On 2015-08-14 22:20, Qaz wrote:
Are there flash drives that really work well with Tails? Or does it not
really matter?
In theory, it shouldn't matter. In practice, well, things are possibly
more complicated if an attack were targeted at Tails in particular.
I installed Tails on a Sandisk Cr
Hi there,
Are there flash drives that really work well with Tails? Or does it not
really matter? I installed Tails on a Sandisk Cruzer and it seems it
wouldn't boot or at least show the login screen, just gets stuck with
the blue and white progress bar. I think I have seen a list of which
devices
On 08/15/2015 02:14 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:34 AM, wrote:
>> On 2015-08-14 13:55, Aeris wrote:
So I'm running a Tails on a DVD-R version 1.5 and I'm very curious as to
if I'm running a legitimate copy of Tails. Could you guys help me?
>>>
>>> AFAIK, you can sh
Lara:
> I use torsocks 2.1.0 with youtube-dl.
>
> After the upgrade the connection keeps breaking off. Quite often the
> dns resolution. And less often the connection just breaks. Everything
> but TBB is unchanged.
>
> So I have made the experiment. With TBB 4.5 everything works fine with
> no er
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:34 AM, wrote:
> On 2015-08-14 13:55, Aeris wrote:
>>>
>>> So I'm running a Tails on a DVD-R version 1.5 and I'm very curious as to
>>> if I'm running a legitimate copy of Tails. Could you guys help me?
>>
>>
>> AFAIK, you can sha256sum the corresponding /dev/XXX device.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Lara wrote:
> I use torsocks 2.1.0 with youtube-dl.
If you want to isolate from torsocks, youtube-dl supports
both option --proxy and the usual proxy environment variables.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other se
Tor Weekly NewsAugust 14th, 2015
Welcome to the thirty-first issue in 2015 of Tor Weekly News, the weekly
newsle
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 09:08:42PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> A few hours ago the meek-azure CDN endpoint stopped working and is now
> serving an error code 403. The outage is caused by an error in account
> management and I think it will be temporary. I am talking with support
> about it now.
>
On 2015-08-14 16:25, Aeris wrote:
It's been almost half an hour and sha256 on /dev/sdX still ain't done
yet Something's wrong here probably.
I never test to run sha256 on a running live-cd /dev/xxx device…
There may have some lock on it when running.
You can try « dd if=/dev/xxx | sha256sum »
> It's been almost half an hour and sha256 on /dev/sdX still ain't done
> yet Something's wrong here probably.
I never test to run sha256 on a running live-cd /dev/xxx device…
There may have some lock on it when running.
You can try « dd if=/dev/xxx | sha256sum » with perhaps more luck.
--
Ae
On 2015-08-14 12:08, Sharif Olorin wrote:
Hi,
So I'm running a Tails on a DVD-R version 1.5 and I'm very curious as
to
if I'm running a legitimate copy of Tails. Could you guys help me?
Did you get Tails in the form of the DVD-R, or did you download the
Tails
iso and write it to a DVD-R? D
On 2015-08-14 13:55, Aeris wrote:
So I'm running a Tails on a DVD-R version 1.5 and I'm very curious as
to
if I'm running a legitimate copy of Tails. Could you guys help me?
AFAIK, you can sha256sum the corresponding /dev/XXX device.
The hash will be the same as the one indicated on the
https:
On 2015-08-14 12:08, Sharif Olorin wrote:
Hi,
So I'm running a Tails on a DVD-R version 1.5 and I'm very curious as
to
if I'm running a legitimate copy of Tails. Could you guys help me?
Did you get Tails in the form of the DVD-R, or did you download the
Tails
iso and write it to a DVD-R? D
On 2015-08-14 13:55, Aeris wrote:
So I'm running a Tails on a DVD-R version 1.5 and I'm very curious as
to
if I'm running a legitimate copy of Tails. Could you guys help me?
AFAIK, you can sha256sum the corresponding /dev/XXX device.
The hash will be the same as the one indicated on the
https:
On 2015-08-14 13:55, Aeris wrote:
So I'm running a Tails on a DVD-R version 1.5 and I'm very curious as
to
if I'm running a legitimate copy of Tails. Could you guys help me?
AFAIK, you can sha256sum the corresponding /dev/XXX device.
The hash will be the same as the one indicated on the
https:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 03:30:54 -0400
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Normal networks start to fall apart when they
> reach around 20-30% of total capacity.
Could you substantiate this claim?
As a network engineer, based on my experience (which may be biased),
I find this hard to believe.
With the rest
> So I'm running a Tails on a DVD-R version 1.5 and I'm very curious as to
> if I'm running a legitimate copy of Tails. Could you guys help me?
AFAIK, you can sha256sum the corresponding /dev/XXX device.
The hash will be the same as the one indicated on the
https://tails.boum.org/download/index.
I use torsocks 2.1.0 with youtube-dl.
After the upgrade the connection keeps breaking off. Quite often the dns
resolution. And less often the connection just breaks. Everything but
TBB is unchanged.
So I have made the experiment. With TBB 4.5 everything works fine with
no error. Back to TBB 5 and
Hi,
> So I'm running a Tails on a DVD-R version 1.5 and I'm very curious as to
> if I'm running a legitimate copy of Tails. Could you guys help me?
Did you get Tails in the form of the DVD-R, or did you download the Tails
iso and write it to a DVD-R? Did you check out the "Verify the ISO
image"
Hi,
qazxsw...@openmailbox.org wrote (14 Aug 2015 11:46:00 GMT) :
> So I'm running a Tails on a DVD-R version 1.5 and I'm very curious as to
> if I'm running a legitimate copy of Tails. Could you guys help me?
Thanks for your interest in Tails. Please address such questions to
the Tails support c
Hi guys!
So I'm running a Tails on a DVD-R version 1.5 and I'm very curious as to
if I'm running a legitimate copy of Tails. Could you guys help me?
Thanks a lot!
Regards.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists
Chris Dagdigian wrote:
> However I'm having issues getting it to operate. I keep seeing this as
> the last log entry:
>
> [warn] ConnLimit must be at least 32. Failing.
>
> .. despite setting ConnLimit to 1024 in torrc and testing the OS via
> "ulimit -H -n" I still see the "Failing" message
22 matches
Mail list logo
